Channel
@terminalcwo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,698subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001339029850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @terminalcwo |
| Created | 16 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/terminalcwo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 7,698 | -18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 7,716 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 7,733 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 7,734 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,511 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 292 | 19.3% | |
| 🔥 | 282 | 18.7% | |
| 💯 | 233 | 15.4% | |
| 🤬 | 190 | 12.6% | |
| ❤ | 161 | 10.7% | |
| 👏 | 136 | 9.00% | |
| 🤮 | 59 | 3.90% | |
| 🤯 | 55 | 3.64% | |
| 💩 | 25 | 1.65% | |
| 😱 | 23 | 1.52% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 1.13% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 0.993% | |
| 🖕 | 12 | 0.794% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.199% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.132% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.132% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.132% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.066% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.066% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Here are the 7,158 documents released from the FOIA sent to Army JAG in reference to the creation of the DEI program and how it bled into every aspect of the Army during the Biden Admin. Citizen journalists, do your thing. https://www.patreon.com/posts/foia-army-jag-149957727?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link
🔥62👍7
https://youtu.be/e7CJJfljEmw?si=8pSoyMrS7RIFZTwc
👍23🔥6
The Army JAG Corps made assignment determinations based on a DEI review. This is illegal. Blatant discrimination based on immutable characteristics. “Would you please complete a DEl review for the attached FY23 AGR PCS Slate. The names of Soldiers getting jobs are as follows…” “Amiga, ODEl is not aware of any DEIA matter concerning any of these folks.” Over 7,000 documents were released for the FOIA. Stay tuned f…
💯47🤬35😱12🔥11❤3
You're in the military for 3 decades, you've been promoted to the rank of General Officer, and you question what's happening because you know how to read. You reopen the gyms, because this is the military and you're not a moron, you tell your troops to stop masking on the flightline in 110 degree weather because that's dangerous and you don't want them to die, and you remove the barbwire around the containment areas…
👏48🔥29🤬23😢15💯8❤6
"All of the advisors around these people are the same exact people that were persecuting people like me and others over the last four years. They [the Pentagon] allow the obstructionist at the second and third tier levels to remain. They literally just shuffle the deck furniture around, but it never gets thrown overboard. We have very different views on the Constitution." - Gen Chris Sage The Pentagon has refused t…
👏30💯15🤬8❤1👍1👎1
Military Deep State and The Price of Speaking Out "Sam Shoemate Podcast Ep. 7" with Brig Gen(R) Chris Sage. Brigadier General Chris Sage, a recently retired fighter pilot from the U.S. Air Force, shares his experiences and challenges during his military career, particularly surrounding his recent retirement and the allegations that led to it. General Sage discusses his commitment to serving his country and the s…
👏23❤7🔥4👍1
Or hit up any platform on any audio source. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sam-shoemate-podcast/id1860394461
👍24❤9
I’m firing all the socials back up. There’s a bunch of conversations I want to start having, and I’m currently reaching out to everyone I know this pertains to. I have the bandwidth to get after it, so I’m going to. I’ll post the military centric podcasts on all platforms. To catch the rest, go to: https://youtube.com/@samshoematepodcast?si=tYArZyOXVufsKSRt
👍76🔥37❤10🤮2❤🔥1
Duty to Disobey teaser trailer and CHD MIL Panel
👍41👏13🔥2
When the pandemic kicked off, I couldn’t have ever imagined I would be at the forefront of exposing the criminality of our military, an organization I had faithfully served in my entire adult life. When I saw violations of regulations, criminal misconduct, ethical violations, extreme coercion, and flagrant medical misconduct, I was enraged. Thankfully, what I set out to do was not done alone. I soon met hundreds of…
🔥99❤36👍25👏9🙏8😍1
Doc Chambers (running for Governor of Texas) gets asked this question a lot. So let me be clear about his stance on Sharia Law:
❤42👍21🔥19
Photo, posted without a caption
👍45❤11🙏8👏3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @terminalcwo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 164,843 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“terminalcwo” (@terminalcwo), 7,698 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terminalcwo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.