Channel
@terekhinatatiana
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
103subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001775804282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @terekhinatatiana |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/terekhinatatiana |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 103 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 101 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 101 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
53 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 37.7% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 22.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 11.3% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сидят 2 воробья на ветке и разговаривают на своём «чирик-чирик», а я просто мимо проходила. — Да я тебе говорю, я так сто раз делал. — Ага, ага. — Просто подлетаешь к кормушке, берешь семечку и улетаешь — ниче не будет. — Да ты гонишь? — Нет. — Ну-ка покажи. Воробей подлетает к кормушке, берет семечку и возвращается к другу. — Вот видишь. — Да ну, ладно? — А я тебе что? — И они прям настоящая? — 100%. — Гонишь. — …
😁2❤1
Использование или глоточек справедливости. Избалованный ли ребёнок? О да! Чтобы вы понимали, у меня в доме комп появился раньше, чем у всех, кого знала, телефон всегда был самой модной модели, велик, приставка, ролики, туфли и деньги, которые можно было просто попросить. Как там складывались обстоятельства? Спустя 4 года учёбы в очень примиленькой школе для особо пиздатых детей, я как человек вольный, принимаю своё …
🔥4❤2
Video, posted without a caption
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
💘3😁2
Я никогда не буду пропагандистом ЗОЖ, не потому что я иду наперекор системе и не потому что кто-то должен поддерживать мировой баланс, хотя блять, кто если не я? А потому что запрет рождает напряжение, и мне кажется, что все наши приколы со срывами — это некий маркер, а установки типа «я не пью» лишают возможности отследить, где поломалось. Для меня все зависимости — это некие балансировочные штуковины, и я вполне з…
😁3
сегодня была умным зайцем - понравилось
🔥3😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3
я в Армении
🔥3👌2
я в Армении, меня заставляют гулять
👍5😁4
фото от https://t.me/mamasatva
🔥7👍1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @terekhinatatiana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Татьяна Терехина” (@terekhinatatiana), 103 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terekhinatatiana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.