Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #Tera #Trhol Hisse

Channel

#Tera #Trhol Hisse

@tera_trhol

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,932subscribers

-10,325 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196175918
TypeChannel
Username@tera_trhol
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held38
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tera_trhol

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 13 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tuprs_hisse1/3675 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC@tera_trhol/380 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@tuprs_hisse1/3695 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC@tera_trhol/382 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@tuprs_hisse1/3706 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC@tera_trhol/383 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@tuprs_hisse1/3726 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC@tera_trhol/385 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@tuprs_hisse1/3747 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC@tera_trhol/387 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@tuprs_hisse1/3757 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC@tera_trhol/388 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tuprs_hisse16 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@tuprs_hisse1 (6–0)
@citas_arz5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@citas_arz (5–0)
@tknka_arz15 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@tknka_arz1 (5–0)
@veyas_arz5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@veyas_arz (5–0)
@kpeks_arz5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@kpeks_arz (5–0)
@halkaarz75 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@halkaarz7 (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 28 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 25 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 13 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @kpeks_arz. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 13 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,93215,25710,094.514 August 2026 — 15,257 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,181 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,142 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,090 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,076 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,966 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,926 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,834 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,527 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,454 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,410 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,369 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,286 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,188 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,185 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,183 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,165 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,115 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,067 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,953 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,679 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,400 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,085 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,666 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,267 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,775 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,709 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,936 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,441 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,846 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,755 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,558 subscribers27 October 2026 — 5,326 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,252 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,032 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,025 subscribers9 November 2026 — 5,017 subscribers13 November 2026 — 4,932 subscribers14 August 202613 November 2026
38 measurements spanning 91 days, net -10,325. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,383–16,806 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 09:084,932-85
9 Nov 2026, 02:115,017-8
5 Nov 2026, 11:165,025-7
2 Nov 2026, 02:365,032-220
29 Oct 2026, 16:315,252-74
27 Oct 2026, 01:475,326-232
24 Oct 2026, 00:395,558-197
20 Oct 2026, 23:305,755-91
17 Oct 2026, 17:375,846-595
14 Oct 2026, 12:376,441-495
11 Oct 2026, 03:416,936-773
4 Oct 2026, 23:207,709-2,066
25 Sept 2026, 13:209,775-2,492
17 Sept 2026, 10:5612,267-399
15 Sept 2026, 09:4112,666-419
13 Sept 2026, 20:2013,085-315
12 Sept 2026, 03:1613,400-279
9 Sept 2026, 20:2013,679-274
6 Sept 2026, 12:1613,953-114
4 Sept 2026, 00:1614,067first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3138.8%
👍1822.5%
🙏911.3%
😢78.75%
🔥56.25%
👏45.00%
😡45.00%
🤬22.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 21:16 UTC≈2,340 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#TERA sıkıştı, 191-194 dirençler.

🙏4❤3👍2

28 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,050 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @halkaarz7Photo

#TEHOL 3 dakika içinde 10 milyar hacim,dönen paralara gel! @halkaarz7

❤2👏2🤬1

25 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,260 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @halkaarz7

MSCI Türkiye kararı: #TERA #TRHOL #KRDMB bu 3 şirket endekse eklenmeyecek. #BRSAN #EUPWR #RGYAS eklenmeye devam edecek. MSCI, Türkiye'yi küçük ölçekli hisselerde koordineli alım-satım ve yapay şişirilmiş serbest dolaşım şüphesi nedeniyle uyarmıştı.

🤬1😡1😢1

25 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,630 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @halkaarz7Photo

#TEHOL Tabanda yaklaşık 40 milyon lot bekliyor. Hisse, grafikten de görüleceği üzere önemli ölçüde primlenmiş ve kısa vadede doygunluk seviyesine ulaşmış görünüyor. Yeni alım düşünenler için mevcut seviyelerde bir süre beklemek daha sağlıklı olabilir. Hissede pozisyonu bulunanlar açısından ise 41,50 TL ve 39,00 TL seviyeleri önemli destek bölgeleri olarak takip edilebilir. Bu seviyelerdeki fiyat hareketleri, hisse…

❤2👍2😢2

21 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,760 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#TERA #TRHOL #TEHOL #PEKGY Bu dörtlüye TeraPaket ismini verdik. Hafta sonu son durumlarına TEKNİK bakacağız. Temel ve duyum kısmı tamamen sizin insifiyatifinizdedir.Saygılar

👍4❤3🙏1

18 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,950 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @halkaarz7

🔴 Tera Holding patronu Emre Tezmen: "Beşiktaş’ı Türkiye’nin en büyük finansal gücüne sahip kulübü yapacağız. Kartal Yuvası, Beşiktaş AP, blok satışlar olmak üzere birçok konuda çalışmalarımızı var. Hiçbir ilişkimiz genelde kısa vadeli değil. Beşiktaş'la da uzun bir yolculuğa çıkıyoruz." 🗣️ Beşiktaş Başkanı Serdar Adalı: Bu arada ben bu ekleme yapayım Emre Bey aynı zamanda genel kuru üyemizdir. Böyle de bir şey va…

❤2🙏2🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @halkaarz7Photo

📊 Tera Yatırım’ın son 10 günde en çok aldığı hisseler @halkaarz7

❤3👏2👍1

14 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC≈16,700 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#TRHOL Tüm zamanlarının en yüksek fiyatına iğne attı 2.291 TL! Elinde var olanlara bereketli olsun Muazzam!

👍3❤2🙏2

13 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,650 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

MSCI Türkiye ve Global Small Cap Endeks değişiklikleri belli oldu 👇🏻 Endekse Girenler #TERA #TRHOL Terayı bu kadar eleştirip, sermaye piyasalarını tehdit edip 2 Tera şirketini endekse almakta ne bileyim :)

❤2👍1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈3,700 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Günlük aracı kurum dağılımı Filler tepişiyor olan küçük yatırımcıya oluyor ezilen biz oluyoruz #Tera

😢4👍2❤1

7 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈3,760 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#TERA 185₺ üzerinde kalıcılık sağlam✅ Dip çalışması bitti yükseliş sırası bizdeee💫 HEDEF:410

❤9👍3🔥3😡3

7 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC665 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

📊 Bank of America’nın Anlık En Çok Sattığı Hisseler (İlk 5) 🥇 #EREGL → 1.434.231.101 TL net satış 🥈 #THYAO → 676.340.723 TL net satış 🥉 #TUPRS → 306.827.731 TL net satış 4️⃣ #ORZAX → 218.204.871 TL net satış 5️⃣ #ASELS → 185.616.173 TL net satış Ana kanalımıza herkesi bekleriz👇 https://t.me/halkaarz7

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @tera_trhol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#Tera #Trhol Hisse” (@tera_trhol), 4,932 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tera_trhol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.