5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,881–6,898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 16:07
6,890
-6
10 Aug 2026, 23:51
6,896
+8
7 Aug 2026, 23:40
6,888
+5
7 Aug 2026, 08:31
6,883
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:24
6,883
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 6,890 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
16 (24 April 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
11,750
Reactions total
495
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,318 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
750
56.9%
❤
448
34.0%
⚡
69
5.24%
custom 5289483019386636030
19
1.44%
👎
12
0.91%
🍓
11
0.835%
🤯
4
0.303%
😁
2
0.152%
😢
2
0.152%
🌚
1
0.076%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
114
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 16 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tentencolor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Курс по цвету уже в производстве. Краткую версию содержания можете посмотреть на скринах. Больше половины лекций уже записано, монтируем потихоньку. Должен зарелизиться к 20м числам августа
Лекции получаются.. объемными) И хоть я и стараюсь сделать порог вхождения минимальным, меня все же порой немного заносит в intermediate. Но никому от этого хуже не станет)
Д/з будет одно, но это будет сразу финальный покрашенны…
Привет
Тут такое дело, мне сегодня 30 лет
Много хороших вещей в моей жизни произошло благодаря тому, что я смог найти свою аудиторию.
Так что сегодня хочу сказать спасибо всем вам – тем кто смотрит, ставит лайки, делает репосты, оставляет комментарии, ну или просто следит за тем, что я делаю на любой платформе)
Ну и по традиции, т.к. подарки я больше люблю дарить, а не получать, то держите вам небольшой презент
П…
Будет два курса по цветокоррекции
Первый — для тех кто хочет максимально быстро освоить цк в давинчи, при этом не перегружая себя нудной, нужной лишь колористам информацией)
Для практики будут реальные проекты, над которыми я сам работал.
— баланс, экспозиция и контраст, насыщенность, мэтчинг, работа с приборами, экскурс в стилизацию
— получение предсказуемого результата с минимальным количеством нод
— работа с ко…
Уважаемые, а расскажите что там сейчас с ру тиктоком. Думаю туда тоже выкладываться, раз в инсте неплохо пошло.
Вижу, что есть региональный блок (старый контент). Насколько тяжко это дело обходить? Быстрое гугление дало мне только какие-то левые схематозы со сторонними клиентами)
Насколько понимаю на iOS это проще обходится, нежели на андроиде.
Да и в целом — ваше мнение про ТТ по сравнению с рилсами тоже можете озв…
Новый выпуск!
Рассказываю, как правильно передать проект из Premiere Pro в DaVinci. Будет полезно и тем, кто хочет архивировать завершенные проекты на своем пк
https://youtu.be/NPdkSmSJi7I
Смотреть в тг
Пишу сценарий нового выпуска про плагины для Resolve (предыдущий был 2 года назад)
Если у вас есть любимые но не особо известные решения в виде ofx, fuse, dctl итд, то самое время рассказать об этом в комментариях под этим постом
И финальное про курсы
На Skillspace я подключил новый платежный модуль, и теперь Курс по калибровке мониторов можно:
1) Оплатить картами зарубежных банков без костылей. Учитывайте, что цена будет больше из-за переконвертаций валюты.
2) Взять в рассрочку/оплатить по частям. Вроде это разные вещи, но, в любом случае, проценты будут на мне — для вас стоимость не увеличится.
По поводу зарубежных карт: при переходе на …
14 июня я прекращаю продажу Гайда по DaVinci Resolve с нуля
Почему так? Да все просто, почти весь гайд был записан еще на 19 версии резолва. И хотя бо́льшая часть гайда все еще актуальна, я не хочу чтобы новые студенты постоянно видели старые элементы интерфейса и старое расположение функций — это будет сильно ухудшать качество обучения.
Да, в случае с 20 версией я сделал "хотфиксы" в виде лекций про новый функцион…
DaVinci Resolve 21 вышла в релиз!
Не забывайте делать бэкап библиотек проектов, или создавайте новую библиотеку при переходе на 21.
И, в связи с этой новостью, скоро будет важное объявление про Гайд по DaVinci Resolve с нуля
https://youtu.be/a98MAbF5ZEA анонс на ютубе!
Вы также можете бесплатно получить доступ к двум теоретическим лекциям курса, чтобы понять, что это вообще за калибровка такая, зачем она нужна, и из каких этапов она состоит)
Надо просто выбрать тариф "Бесплатно" на странице курса
https://clck.ru/3Tsf5W
Приятного обучения)
Друзья, курс по калибровке мониторов уже доступен к приобретению. Все модули открыты для прохождения. Также добавил тестирование после теоретических лекций.
По содержанию почти ничего не изменилось — что-то убавилось, что-то добавилось (добавилось больше, чем убавилось), но на 95% содержание осталось как в предыдущем посте. Хрон в районе 5,5 часов. Подробное актуальное содержание курса — на странице курса
Я перешел…
🔥30⚡12❤12👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tentencolor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Курс по калибровке мониторов (UI + реф) и MacBook Air/Pro25%
Мастеркласс по работе с кожей и коммерческой ретуши видео38%
Курс по цветокоррекции63%
Мастеркласс по созданию креативных LUT — под проект, для оператора, итд26%
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,282,676 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТенТен” (@tentencolor), 6,890 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tentencolor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.