Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎾 Tennis Masterr Picks

Channel

🎾 Tennis Masterr Picks

@tennismasterrpicks

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

10,671subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001492122312
TypeChannel
Username@tennismasterrpicks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tennismasterrpicks

Growth

10,64610,71310,679.57 August 2026 β€” 10,713 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 10,713 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 10,705 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 10,703 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 10,698 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 10,693 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 10,685 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 10,680 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 10,666 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 10,661 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 10,652 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 10,653 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 10,652 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 10,653 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 10,648 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 10,646 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 10,652 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 10,649 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 10,651 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 10,654 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 10,664 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 10,668 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 10,663 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 10,662 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 10,649 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 10,647 subscribers9 September 2026 β€” 10,671 subscribers10,6717 August 20269 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 33 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,636–10,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 14:5910,671+24
6 Sept 2026, 09:2010,647-2
4 Sept 2026, 05:0010,649-13
2 Sept 2026, 16:5410,662-1
1 Sept 2026, 15:0510,663-5
31 Aug 2026, 15:2310,668+4
30 Aug 2026, 15:1410,664+10
29 Aug 2026, 12:1410,654+3
28 Aug 2026, 13:4710,651+2
27 Aug 2026, 14:5810,649-3
26 Aug 2026, 12:3310,652+6
25 Aug 2026, 14:1210,646-2
21 Aug 2026, 15:4410,648-5
20 Aug 2026, 11:2410,653+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:2410,652-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:4310,653+1
17 Aug 2026, 14:3310,652-9
16 Aug 2026, 07:5410,661-5
14 Aug 2026, 18:2610,666-14
13 Aug 2026, 06:3710,680first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
24.5%
avg views Γ· 10,671 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,610
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held45 (23 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total57,490
Reactions total683
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,072 reactions across 45 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1,18457.1%
😱55126.6%
πŸ‘793.81%
πŸ‘€683.28%
πŸ‘532.56%
πŸ”₯381.83%
πŸ†281.35%
⚑180.869%
πŸ₯°130.627%
πŸ‘Œ120.579%
πŸŽ‰90.434%
❀‍πŸ”₯80.386%
πŸ’―50.241%
😍40.193%
🍾20.097%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2,072 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:46 UTCβ‰ˆ1,070 views20 reactionsread 1 September 2026

US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ύ Vallejo @ 1.75 / -133 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Monfils obviously brings the aura and the show in his last-ever Grand Slam event and should definitely have the crowd behind him during Monday’s night session, but there is a huge but β€” this is best-of-five, and the Frenchman is 39. Vallejo is obviously not the biggest threat on hard courts nowadays, but he is pretty consistent from the baselin…

❀18πŸ‘1😱1

1 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTCβ‰ˆ1,090 views20 reactionsread 1 September 2026

US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Altmaier @ 2.40 / +140 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Svajda started the year really well, but he has looked far from that level this summer in the States, so there isn’t much for me to like about him being in the favorite position today. With him not operating at his best in recent times, I like Altmaier at these numbers. I’ve always liked the German in underdog spots because of his high upside,…

❀19πŸ‘1

1 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTCβ‰ˆ1,090 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026

US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· JM Cerundolo @ 2.18 / +118 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ I’m not as high on Gea as the market seems to be. The market probably likes him because he is an exciting young prospect fresh off his maiden ATP title, but truth be told, that was one of the weakest ATP events this season. Obviously, I’m not taking anything away from him, but perhaps the market is overvaluing that run, at least in my eyes.…

❀18

1 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTCβ‰ˆ1,460 views30 reactionsread 1 September 2026

US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Sweeny @ 3.49 / +249 (bet105) - 0.5u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Moutet revealed a few weeks ago that he had been dealing with a left wrist injury for almost a year before eventually withdrawing from Cincinnati and Winston-Salem. That certainly helps explain some of his below-par results this season. At the time, he said: β€œI kept playing, gritted my teeth and pushed through the pain all year… but I was not …

❀27πŸ‘€2😱1

31 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTCβ‰ˆ2,080 views37 reactionsread 1 September 2026

US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Kovacevic @ 2.08 / +108 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Vacherot has been pretty uninspiring since returning from his foot injury, and I still have doubts about whether he is fully fit. He has looked far from his best from the baseline in recent matches, with his movement noticeably slow at times. If it was simply a case of post-injury rust, you would have thought getting some reps and match fitnes…

❀23πŸ‘€5😱5πŸ‘Œ4

30 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTCβ‰ˆ2,270 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026

US Open πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Vukic @ 2.44 / +144 (bet105) - 0.75u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ A bit surprised to see this one priced so wide. I get that Sakamoto is a talented youngster with plenty of potential, but at this stage I’m not sure I can clearly power-rank him above Vukic, especially in this longer format. The Japanese came through qualifying this week, and I feel qualifiers often get a bit overvalued by the market simply be…

❀20πŸ‘€3πŸ‘3😱3πŸ‘2πŸ†1

25 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTCβ‰ˆ3,620 views52 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Winston Salem πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Kovacevic @ 2.30 / +130 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Van Assche has been producing very solid results in recent months, while Kovacevic has been the complete opposite. However, the Frenchman is coming off a fresh title in Quebec City, and I think that opens the door for the American today, who should be desperate to get something going with his top-100 spot under serious threat. We rarely…

❀48πŸ‘€4

25 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTCβ‰ˆ3,250 views45 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Winston Salem πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡«πŸ‡· Bonzi @ 2.68 / +168 (bet105) - 0.75u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Halys has produced some great results in his last few events, and the market has clearly taken notice, but I wouldn’t get as carried away as the market seems to have. Halys isn’t someone I trust to consistently reproduce this level week in, week out, mainly because of his low-margin style of tennis. That’s especially true with the condit…

❀40⚑3πŸ‘€1πŸ‘1

23 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTCβ‰ˆ3,150 views47 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Winston Salem πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· Comesana @ 2.60 / +160 (bet105) - 0.75u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Wu just isn’t a reliable player at these prices. Although hard courts are clearly his best surface and Comesana is more of a clay-courter, the Argentine has still proven himself and shouldn’t be discounted in these conditions. Comesana may not be in his best form, but neither is the Chinese. And when it comes to Wu, his low-margin sty…

πŸ‘17❀15⚑8πŸ”₯6πŸ‘1

19 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTCβ‰ˆ4,090 views43 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Cincinnati πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή Borges @ 2.44 / +144 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ As I said earlier this week, players who aren’t used to going this deep at big events rarely manage to back it up when transitioning from the Canadian Masters to Cincinnati. Nakashima did an exceptional job turning his match around yesterday, but this feels like a tough spot with no day off. He looked quite leggy until he saved those match po…

❀29😱5πŸ‘€3πŸ‘3🍾2πŸ”₯1

17 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTCβ‰ˆ3,860 views45 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Cincinnati πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Tiafoe @ 2.27 / +127 (bet105) - 1u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Tiafoe wiped away pretty much all the doubts surrounding his hand surgery with a seriously impressive performance the other night. Perhaps the surgery and the subsequent rehab/healing process weren’t as challenging as many might have expected. As for this matchup, I really don’t see much between these two, especially given Tiafoe’s improved c…

❀31πŸ‘7πŸ”₯3πŸ†2⚑1πŸ‘Œ1

17 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTCβ‰ˆ3,100 views29 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Cincinnati πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡¨πŸ‡± Tabilo @ 3.04 / +204 (bet105) - 0.5u LIKE IF TAILING! ❀️ Jodar is on a serious heater, winning 9 of his last 11 matches. However, there has been a noticeable dip in his level over the last few matches, and perhaps that’s a sign of the youngster starting to get a bit leggy. That would be more than understandable given his busy recent schedule and how demanding the conditions can be in this part of …

❀19πŸ”₯5πŸ‘3😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @tennismasterrpicks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Junior Tips Officialℒ️
@Juniortipsofficial Β· 37,534
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 47 here β€” alongside 46 others β€” read 31 August 2026
TigerExch Official
@tigerexchme Β· 29,297
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 53 here β€” alongside 52 others β€” read 8 September 2026
Corvo Bets
@Corvo_bets Β· 42,596
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 56 here β€” alongside 55 others β€” read 6 September 2026
πŸ₯‡ 𝗣π—₯π—’π—‘π—’π—¦π—§π—œπ—žπ—’π—₯​ ️️️πŸ₯‡
@PRONOSTIKOR Β· 49,489
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 54 here β€” alongside 53 others β€” read 26 August 2026
Peguy_tbn
@peguy_tbn1 Β· 33,370
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 72 here β€” alongside 71 others β€” read 4 September 2026
πŸ€ NBA Injuries
@NBAInjuries Β· 105,042
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here β€” alongside 80 others β€” read 23 August 2026
US Betting HubπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
@mlb_picks_baseball_tips Β· 32,990
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 2 September 2026
𝐀𝐒𝐀ℒ 𓃡
@theofficialasa Β· 54,156
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here β€” alongside 83 others β€” read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸŽΎ Tennis Masterr Picks” (@tennismasterrpicks), 10,671 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tennismasterrpicks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.