4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 837โ846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 20:59
845
+6
1 Sept 2026, 06:29
839
+1
31 Aug 2026, 14:45
838
no change
31 Aug 2026, 14:30
838
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
22.5%
avg views รท 845 subscribers
Avg views / post
190
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
20 (26 August 2026 โ 31 August 2026)
Views total
3,803
Reactions total
72
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
45
62.5%
๐ฅ
10
13.9%
๐
9
12.5%
๐
4
5.56%
๐
3
4.17%
๐พ
1
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐พ Arnaldi ml @ 1.83
Arandi ml is worth at those odds only, value was completely on him on the opening line that's the reason I sent it 2 days back now he is just 1.56 fav that's huge CLV for us and that's the way to beat the books
Arnaldi has the ceiling and he's thrice the player that Duckworth is, give me Arnaldi any day at these odds I'll bite happily
๐พ Golubic ml @ 2.10
This bet is very calculative and logicaโฆ
Fucsovics is 5.0 dog against Merida
This is insane value but problem is Fucsovics looks washed and we don't know that even if he is fit or even cares, don't know what he's left with to offer on court
Merida either wins in straights or Fucsovics wins there's no in between
He should be available at evens against Merida usually but yeah lot of ifs and buts so the price
Good luck If you're betting Merida at such shoโฆ
๐บ๐ธ ๐๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง
๐พ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป +7.5g 2Us @ 1.70
๐พ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป ml 0.5U @ 6.20
Good fade spot on Tommy Paul here, he has been so inconsistent lately and his form is not promising either
Coleman is a capable opponent to keep it tight or even pull an upset here, at these odds it's worth to fade this clown version of tommy paul
โค๏ธ Like if you're tailing
Bet placed on FairWin247.co
August 27th Recap ๐พ
2Us
โ Basavareddy ml
โ Coleman + Montgomery
1Us
โ Zidansek +1.5 sets
โ Heather Watson +3.5g
โ Pridankina +5.5g
5-0 clean sweep with +6.65Us ๐ฐ
Incredible day just before the main draw
Lit it up let's keep rolling โค๏ธ
๐ฆ POTD
โ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฑy ml
๐ต +2.40Us
Nishesh Basavareddy finally playing to his full potential and has been our cash cow in qualifiers, thanks to him
โค๏ธ Show some love if you tailed
โ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป + ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ด๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐
Cash the 2U Play ๐ฐ
Only one Play has been completed from yesterday's card and that's a winner ๐
๐บ๐ธ ๐๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง
๐พ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป + ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ด๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ @ 1.88
If I have to club two fav's to do their job then this is the best pair i got today, Don't see either of them losing as they are superior to their opponents
maybe lajovic might snatch a set but I feel coleman should be comfortable on this surface and for Montgomery this should be a routine win
โค๏ธ Like if you're tailing
๐จ ๐ฃ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ
๐บ๐ธ ๐๐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง
๐พ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ ml 2Us @ 2.20
Yes we are going with nishesh basavareddy again after backing him against kouame & mikrut
Basavareddy is playing very well as I said in my previous write up he often raises his level in Grandslam matches and buzzing crowd will push his limits further
Gea Arthur is in good form as well but I rate these two closely and nishesh being dog made me side with hโฆ
โค3๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tennisfreakbets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Junior Tips Officialโข๏ธ @Juniortipsofficial ยท 37,534 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 47 here โ alongside 46 others โ read 31 August 2026
TigerExch Official @tigerexchme ยท 29,297 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 53 here โ alongside 52 others โ read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โTennisFreakBets ๐พ ๐โ (@tennisfreakbets), 845 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tennisfreakbets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
