Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TE7 — TENET

@tenetvezde

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002529831905
TypeChannel
Username@tenetvezde
Descriptionown - @a1taiirr
Created21 March 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tenetvezde

Growth

910 August 2026 — 9 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9 subscribers10 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:039no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:459first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 21 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 4 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52854402096205892651014.9%
custom 5285185664088821097913.4%
custom 5217754845045353435710.4%
custom 5240500450679083976710.4%
custom 527395325516292531557.46%
custom 521789230547366388545.97%
custom 521751442995599357734.48%
custom 531670755435558656734.48%
custom 545845917038885419634.48%
custom 530330317187817766822.99%
custom 530529024708760602022.99%
custom 543379077232120718122.99%
custom 523099150904985670911.49%
custom 528775503807933935611.49%
custom 529631848131305387511.49%
custom 529671875508517544911.49%
custom 535289639474091283211.49%
custom 537975760983636477311.49%
custom 537977254343765250011.49%
custom 538220407474777369911.49%
2 further kinds22.99%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2025 to 25 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tenetvezde. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2025 to 25 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 May 2025, 18:14 UTCviews —

TE7 — TENET pinned «Мы навсегда закрылись. Братство, спасибо вам за то, что были до конца. Участники, вам тоже спасибо за те невероятные чувства, которые вы оставили. Спасибо всем.🫶🏼»

21 May 2025, 18:14 UTC330 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мы навсегда закрылись. Братство, спасибо вам за то, что были до конца. Участники, вам тоже спасибо за те невероятные чувства, которые вы оставили. Спасибо всем.🫶🏼

custom 52177548450453534355custom 53167075543555865671

Signed armanov.

26 Apr 2025, 17:14 UTC≈1,340 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✔️our — archive ✔️our prem emoji — 🎶 ✔️our — tiktok ✔️our — anon ✔️our — memory

custom 52178923054736638854custom 52851856640888210973custom 54584591703888541963custom 53167075543555865672custom 52177548450453534351custom 52877550380793393561custom 52963184813130538751custom 52967187550851754491

Signed KR7

30 Mar 2025, 19:32 UTC≈2,020 views28 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

👕WE — TENET 👕 ✔️ PAXAN ✔️ Мы не подстраиваемся под правила, мы создаём новые.🌟🙈 PATENT 💬 INFO 💬 BOOST

custom 52854402096205892658custom 52851856640888210976custom 52739532551629253154custom 52405004506790839762custom 53052902470876060202custom 54337907723212071812custom 53033031718781776681custom 53528963947409128321

30 Mar 2025, 16:05 UTC≈1,560 views15 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️ с этого дня мы заявляем что название "Tenet / тенет" принадлежит нам. если кто-то будет использовать это название для своего кф, мы имеем полное право попросить изменить его. 🌟дата патента - 26.05

custom 52405004506790839765custom 52175144299559935773custom 52854402096205892652custom 52177548450453534351custom 52309915090498567091custom 52739532551629253151custom 53033031718781776681custom 53797576098363647731

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @tenetvezde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 875,898 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TE7 — TENET” (@tenetvezde), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tenetvezde.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.