Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 57 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 784–828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 13:38
789
-24
18 Sept 2026, 15:37
813
+3
31 Aug 2026, 07:54
810
-4
23 Aug 2026, 08:04
814
-6
15 Aug 2026, 02:08
820
-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:31
823
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:45
823
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
86
39.3%
❤
69
31.5%
⚡
37
16.9%
💯
9
4.11%
👌
7
3.20%
😎
4
1.83%
🤝
3
1.37%
❤🔥
2
0.913%
💘
2
0.913%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как нейронки стали делать почти всю работу за меня?
Почти все из вас, наверняка, используют нейронки на уровне вопросов чатуГПТ🤦♂️
Но что реально можно сделать с помощью них?
- Составить подробный план с декомпозицией для чего угодно
- Базу клиентов с их уникальными болями и запросами
- Полноценную, презентацию, сайт или даже приложение для своих клиентов
- И это только малая часть всего📈
За 50-100$ в месяц ты за…
Ищу 1-2 смышленных ребят💲
Хочу делегировать один из процессов продюсирования
Из требований только компьютер и адекватность
За условиями в личку @alova1
Клиенты сука, клиенты➡️
95% людей в онлайне не могут найти достаточно платежеспособных клиентов
Вот основные советы, чтобы навсегда решить проблему с поиском клиентов:
- Работай на количество. Вместо убивания времени на 1 клиента сделай таблицу из сотни и автоматизируй процесс закрытия
- Нормально упакуй свои услуги. Сделай презентации, коммерческие предложения и т.п.
Это увеличит конверсию в разы📈
- Прокачай нав…
💲Сколько денег в продюсировании?
Я вижу, что много ребят которые заходят в эту нишу не могут найти нормальных экспертов и зарабатывают копейки🤦♂️
Выручка с инфобизнеса на 2025 год в России составила 116 млрд. рублей. И это только через основную платформу для оплаты (getcourse)
И ты не сможешь достать отсюда свои 200-300 тысяч в месяц?
📝Продюсер - основной проводник экспертов при продаже своих инфопродуктов. Есл…
✔️Продюсирование.
Что это вообще такое?
Я понял, что рассказываю о куче плюсов этой ниши, но так и не объяснил вам самое главное
Это не SMM, продвижение канала и написание постов
Это комплексная работа над систематизацией продаж проекта и его продвижением📈
Количество рабочих процессов сложно описать в тексте, поэтому закидываю вам майнд карту с обобщенным примером запуска канала👆👆👆
Построй систему❕
Я говорю не только о работе, а о подходе в жизни
Долгое время я:
- Держал все дела в голове
- Планировал "наугад"
- Не фокусировался на конкретных делах♾
Такой подход привел к стагнации в доходе и постоянным нервным срывам
✔️Что обязательно нужно сделать?
- Сделать рекомпозицию целей, к которым хочешь прийти
- Скачать любой планировщик и добавлять в него основные задачи на день
- Минимально систе…
Чисто гипотетически🤦♂️
Отдал бы 5к, чтобы стать продюсером и взять первый проект в работу?
Конечно42%
Базару нет15%
Не43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @temnikov_business. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤦♂️Хочу сделать для вас гайд, как реально заработать со своего первого запуска. Статья или видос?
Статья34%
Видео66%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 17 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TEMNIKOV” (@temnikov_business), 789 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temnikov_business.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.