100 реакций?

Channel
𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘭𝘪𝘹 ౨ৎ
@temlix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,619subscribers
+102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002178431449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @temlix |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/temlix |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 3,619 | +54 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 3,565 | +37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 3,528 | +11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 3,517 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 3,517 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 35.8%
- avg views ÷ 3,619 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,300
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.24%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (25 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,822 |
| Reactions total | 2,586 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,559 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5289674617877737195 | 667 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5289670000787893156 | 526 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5289943637449284273 | 327 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5289770850914967755 | 251 | 9.81% | |
| custom 5415882193215983265 | 192 | 7.50% | |
| custom 5285017632083316763 | 189 | 7.39% | |
| custom 5377859891421552032 | 95 | 3.71% | |
| custom 5290028394333904542 | 90 | 3.52% | |
| custom 5377647410799484733 | 85 | 3.32% | |
| custom 5289903556814477567 | 28 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5208616932755937352 | 25 | 0.977% | |
| custom 5289479033657010396 | 24 | 0.938% | |
| custom 5210868595130664018 | 19 | 0.742% | |
| custom 5289857347261340692 | 18 | 0.703% | |
| custom 5375225994137343979 | 12 | 0.469% | |
| custom 5472079151634622030 | 11 | 0.43% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,586reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 135
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 23 we hold a reading for · 35%
- Most on one post
- 20
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @temlix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
с чем у вас ассоциируется темликс? будь это животное, цвет, какие-то книги или сериалы, персонажи или другое. интересно почитать ваши ответы 🤩
stickers w nikova banks. — (melisa asimi + black cat) if you took stickers, please put “+” in comments 🤩
100 ®️?
custom 52086169327559373522
stickers w red & black random 🤍 #random #celebrity with love, your @temlix 🦋
custom 537785989142155203289custom 528501763208331676335custom 541588219321598326533custom 53776474107994847337custom 54720791516346220307custom 52086169327559373526custom 52108685951306640186custom 53752259941373439796
stickers w hailey bieber 🤍 #haileybieber #celebrity with love, your @temlix 🦋
custom 5285017632083316763116custom 537764741079948473342custom 541588219321598326540custom 52086169327559373528custom 53752259941373439796custom 53778598914215520326custom 52108685951306640185custom 54720791516346220304
победители этого интерактива выбраны в комментариях. победитель номер 1, напишите пожалуйста в ответ на результаты, чтоб получить звезды. номер 3, оставьте пожалуйста свой запрос под этим постом: https://t.me/temlix/3356. победители номер 4 и 5, выберите пожалуйста себе подарок за 50/25 звезд соответственно, и напишите в ответ на сообщение с результатами. всем спасибо за участие ®️
предлагаю сделать один пост с тем персонажем/селебрити, которого ждут многие, но с кем на канале ничего нет. для этого сейчас кину опрос в комментариях, и вы сможете выбрать кого-то.
stickers w heather mulgrew 🤍 #heathermulgrew #themapthatleadstoyou with love, your @temlix 🦋
custom 5415882193215983265118custom 528501763208331676338custom 537764741079948473336custom 52086169327559373529custom 52108685951306640186
stickers w mika abdalla🤩 #mikaabdalla #celebrity with love, your @temlix 🦋
custom 5289674617877737195116custom 528977085091496775539custom 528967000078789315638custom 52899436374492842734custom 52108685951306640181
любимые, всем большое спасибо за 3500. честно говоря даже не ожидала, что тут когда-то будет такая цифра, от чего у меня ещё больше счастья сейчас 💘 также огромное спасибо каждому за актив, за плюсики, реакции и звезды на постах 🤩 с любовью, никова.
custom 528967000078789315622custom 528994363744928427310custom 52897708509149677556custom 52896746178777371955custom 54158821932159832651
stickers w winter ashby 💋 #winterashby #devilsnight with love, your @temlix 🦋
custom 5289670000787893156112custom 528967461787773719546custom 528977085091496775539custom 52899436374492842734
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @temlix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 42,847 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@r1ddles · 662 posts𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗌 𝜗𝜚
@verbstars · 5,4842 posts𝒟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎 ⋆ нарезки по дому дракона.
@dantemiaa · 1,0831 post𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝜗𝜚 / нарезки по всем фд.
@darslind · 3,6981 post𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨 𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲.💋
@infomfw · 481 post~𝒟𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒶`𝒜𝓁ℯ𝓍𝒶𝓃𝒹𝓇ℴ𝓋𝓃𝒶°
@NO1_M3 · 151 poststickers.
@stickers4yo · 151 post𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘭𝘪𝘹 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯
@temlixinfo · 101 post𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐋𝐒
@viinelss · 1,1381 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘭𝘪𝘹 ౨ৎ” (@temlix), 3,619 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temlix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.