Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘭𝘪𝘹 ౨ৎ

@temlix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,619subscribers

+102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002178431449
TypeChannel
Username@temlix
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/temlix

Growth

3,5173,6193,5686 August 2026 — 3,517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,517 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,528 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,565 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,619 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,502–3,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:353,619+54
10 Aug 2026, 10:423,565+37
7 Aug 2026, 03:173,528+11
6 Aug 2026, 08:313,517no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:223,517first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 3,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total29,822
Reactions total2,586
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,559 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528967461787773719566726.1%
custom 528967000078789315652620.6%
custom 528994363744928427332712.8%
custom 52897708509149677552519.81%
custom 54158821932159832651927.50%
custom 52850176320833167631897.39%
custom 5377859891421552032953.71%
custom 5290028394333904542903.52%
custom 5377647410799484733853.32%
custom 5289903556814477567281.09%
custom 5208616932755937352250.977%
custom 5289479033657010396240.938%
custom 5210868595130664018190.742%
custom 5289857347261340692180.703%
custom 5375225994137343979120.469%
custom 5472079151634622030110.43%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,586reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
135
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 23 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @temlix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC319 viewsread 7 August 2026

с чем у вас ассоциируется темликс? будь это животное, цвет, какие-то книги или сериалы, персонажи или другое. интересно почитать ваши ответы 🤩

7 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026

stickers w nikova banks. — (melisa asimi + black cat) if you took stickers, please put “+” in comments 🤩

7 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC667 views189 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

stickers w red & black random 🤍 #random #celebrity with love, your @temlix 🦋

custom 537785989142155203289custom 528501763208331676335custom 541588219321598326533custom 53776474107994847337custom 54720791516346220307custom 52086169327559373526custom 52108685951306640186custom 53752259941373439796

6 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC758 views227 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

stickers w hailey bieber 🤍 #haileybieber #celebrity with love, your @temlix 🦋

custom 5285017632083316763116custom 537764741079948473342custom 541588219321598326540custom 52086169327559373528custom 53752259941373439796custom 53778598914215520326custom 52108685951306640185custom 54720791516346220304

6 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC628 viewsread 7 August 2026

победители этого интерактива выбраны в комментариях. победитель номер 1, напишите пожалуйста в ответ на результаты, чтоб получить звезды. номер 3, оставьте пожалуйста свой запрос под этим постом: https://t.me/temlix/3356. победители номер 4 и 5, выберите пожалуйста себе подарок за 50/25 звезд соответственно, и напишите в ответ на сообщение с результатами. всем спасибо за участие ®️

6 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC651 viewsread 7 August 2026

предлагаю сделать один пост с тем персонажем/селебрити, которого ждут многие, но с кем на канале ничего нет. для этого сейчас кину опрос в комментариях, и вы сможете выбрать кого-то.

5 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC965 views207 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

stickers w heather mulgrew 🤍 #heathermulgrew #themapthatleadstoyou with love, your @temlix 🦋

custom 5415882193215983265118custom 528501763208331676338custom 537764741079948473336custom 52086169327559373529custom 52108685951306640186

4 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,290 views198 reactions20 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

stickers w mika abdalla🤩 #mikaabdalla #celebrity with love, your @temlix 🦋

custom 5289674617877737195116custom 528977085091496775539custom 528967000078789315638custom 52899436374492842734custom 52108685951306640181

3 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,060 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

любимые, всем большое спасибо за 3500. честно говоря даже не ожидала, что тут когда-то будет такая цифра, от чего у меня ещё больше счастья сейчас 💘 также огромное спасибо каждому за актив, за плюсики, реакции и звезды на постах 🤩 с любовью, никова.

custom 528967000078789315622custom 528994363744928427310custom 52897708509149677556custom 52896746178777371955custom 54158821932159832651

2 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈1,300 views201 reactions20 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

stickers w winter ashby 💋 #winterashby #devilsnight with love, your @temlix 🦋

custom 5289670000787893156112custom 528967461787773719546custom 528977085091496775539custom 52899436374492842734

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @temlix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 42,847 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘭𝘪𝘹 ౨ৎ” (@temlix), 3,619 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temlix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.