Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Темки от BOSS’а ⚫️ 🟠

@temkabosssa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,521subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001981807495
TypeChannel
Username@temkabosssa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/temkabosssa

Growth

3,5213,5223,521.57 Aug 2026, 15:02 — 3,522 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:41 — 3,521 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:028 Aug 2026, 13:41
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,521–3,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:413,521-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:023,522first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.8%
avg views ÷ 3,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total11,570
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

400 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12631.5%
😁7218.0%
🔥6015.0%
🤡5413.5%
😭369.00%
😢164.00%
😱164.00%
🤔92.25%
🤯51.25%
💊20.5%
🤣20.5%
👍10.25%
💩10.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @temkabosssa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня смешная ситуация произошла,фейфишнг украл ЛП токены морфо,расформировал их на 500к USDC и свапнул через юнисвап на ETH и роут повел его куда то не туда😁 * 500к он обменял на 68 ефиров,выходит он купил Ефир примерно по 7300$,а меня такая цена устраивала бы😁 Кош фишинга: https://debank.com/profile/0x920d3b63541eafe13e05dc4f3453904102c39708/history

😁8

1 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC≈2,130 views56 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот и стукнуло мне 30😐 Это такой период сделать выводы и анализ с предыдущей даты.Посмотреть кто остался рядом с того времени,чего смог достигнуть,воплотил ли мечты и идеи в жизнь,а от каких уже отказался потому что взгяды поменялись. Спасибо всем кто не потерялся с этого периода,благодаря вам я имею то что имею сейчас(Я ценю что вы рядом,всем близким и родным❤️) Жизненные цели вроде по чучуть закрываю,но глоабаль

🔥3719

31 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,840 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Слава Богу переезд закончился и я могу уже хотя бы клавиатуру по клацать. Вот такие у меня виды с окна будут примерно год😁 Надеюсь данный вид даст больше енергии и возможности заработать . *Первую денежку уже заработал на шорте msUSD и msETH.Не много но приятно.(Могу расписать что и как было,кто не в курсе) Утром проспал Vana,обидно очень,но там реально было вынести очень много,вот нахуй он начал продавать в 7 у

22🔥8🤔4😁2👍1

25 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC≈2,210 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Последняя остановка в Отеле и завтра уже буду в точке назначения. 7 дней в дороге с Варшавы и я на месте. В номере такое фото,кто найдет монеты на картинке (Имею ввиду тикер по типу BNB) Закину копейку или подарочек в ТГ,всем хорошего вечера ❤️

9

23 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,100 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Где то потерял,значит где то найду в два раза больше😐 Ебаные хуесосы проебали моего малого коллекцию Хотвилс монстрТраков и мои карточки (пару коробочек)

😢16😱3

22 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈2,220 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если что я третий день в дороге,переезжаю в другую страну (забитый под потолок вещами,что там даже не продохнуть) Так что еще буду где то 4 дня в дороге,можете зарабатывать(кстати в день когда был Allbridge я тоже посылки отвозил енджою что бы он потом мне отправил их) Так что Женек вам дал заработать,я тоже дал всем заработать,когда там уже весь молодняк полетит на Бали что бы и я заработал!

4😁3

13 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC≈2,550 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему люди которые заработали на темке ебанутые деньги,сразу переводят в USDS? Я понимаю что типо децентрализованный Стейбл который не могут заморозить,но если ты заработал на арбитраже и не украл деньги чего переживать. Но тоже 3.6% на пару лямов выходит в месяц N к стабильно) А то вот вижу тип вспомнил что он заработал 5 лямов за пару ефиров и решил все залить в USDS Я хз делал бы я так же,но по идеи если он

🤔52

12 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC≈2,480 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто там говорил что я ставлю в 1% лимитки?) Картофельный вообще там за копейки готов душу продать)😁

😭11🤡3

11 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC≈2,670 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Признавайтесь кто ночью выносил сеть HBAR? Там взломали лендинг Bonzo и украли норм денег,что дало хорошую возможность для арбитража на их сеть. Ну вроде то что я увидел люди арбитражили очень приличные суммы с 3 часов ночи и до 11 дня по Европе. Арбитражили BTC и ETH в +10% Я увы только сейчас начал проверять что и как там 😁

11😭7

8 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,730 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну я не понимаю кем нужно быть что бы высидеть столько иксов. Как на фантиках подымаются такие суммы я не понимаю😭 Плюс он еще очень сильно покормил людей ночью,своими продажами! *Кош типа https://debank.com/profile/0x1648c13a8ed3ffb194b2c033497a5e82e543cb82/history?chain=hood&token=0x020bfc650a365f8bb26819deaabf3e21291018b4_CASHCAT

😱132

7 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC≈2,400 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Футбол точно по сценарию,выбили слабые руки на ставках побрили лохов кто ставил уже на победу Египта,ФИФА протащит старого по максимуму😁

11😁4🤡2💩1🤣1

6 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC≈2,540 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Гениально спизжено 21 миллион долларов в токене BONK😁 *Провели голосование в котором решили перевести токены на адресс (Пишут что это хакер,но скорее всего это команда дала себе возможность красиво уебать в стакан токены) Голосование что с 30 числа по 6 Июля ЗА проголсовало 882 милиарда токенов Нет проголосовало всего 800 миллионов (Я сам всю механику не шарю но в кратце выглядит так)Поищите сами инфу в интерн

10😁2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @temkabosssa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,059,413 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Темки от BOSS’а ⚫️ 🟠” (@temkabosssa), 3,521 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temkabosssa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.