Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТОП - Тёма о программировани

@temaProg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,858subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001414960208
TypeChannel
Username@temaProg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/temaProg

Growth

2,8552,8582,856.56 August 2026 — 2,855 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,855 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,858 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,855–2,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:372,858+3
6 Aug 2026, 05:052,855no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:472,855first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

651 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥35354.2%
13120.1%
👍9714.9%
284.30%
🎉91.38%
👏60.922%
🍌50.768%
😎30.461%
🥰30.461%
🦄30.461%
❤‍🔥20.307%
🕊20.307%
🙏20.307%
🤩20.307%
🤮20.307%
👌10.154%
😢10.154%
🥱10.154%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 651reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @temaProg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 20 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,680
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,880
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwTg8o2125 May 202625 May 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 20 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,620 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Завтра(14:00) на стриме с @siberiacancode пообщаемся на тему агентов в разработке. Забегайте, задавайте вопросы(не только про агентов) 📞

12👍2🔥1

19 Jun 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,640 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @siberiacancode

🍿 АНОНС СТРИМА 20 июня в 14:00 по мск twitch — youtube — vk

13🔥6🤩2

16 Jun 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,910 views26 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Я уже рассказывал вам про скиллы: зачем они и как их писать. Решил сделать реп с моими скиллами, которые я пишу в процессе работы над различными проектами. Они очищены от моих деталек, поэтому можно смело себе ставить. Пока добавил в реп наиболее общие скиллы, постепенно буду добавлять. Что там уже есть: — socratic-tutor — в последние месяцы я активно использую агента в повторении универской пр

🔥222❤‍🔥2

10 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,860 views49 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Прошлые два поста были про сдвиг в голове: React всё меньше про «сравни деревья», всё больше про «какую работу и когда делать». Три поста на одной философии — перебор, так что ныряем под капот. Начну с фундамента: с чем React вообще работает, когда рендерит. Звучит занудно, но пока тут чёрный ящик, советы про memo и colocation остаются заклинаниями: делай так, а почему — непонятно. JSX — это объ

🔥378👏4

3 Jun 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,930 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Раньше я, как и все, искал одну лучшую модель. Выходит новая — в чатиках вопрос «что сейчас топ». Одна шкала: от «тупее» к «умнее». Потом я начал экспериментировать с промпт-левел харнесами: оркестрацией, сабагентами и ролями поверх обычного чата. Не «один чат на всё», а оркестратор, исполнитель, быстрый поиск по кодбазе, архитектурный советник. Под каждую роль — своя цепочка моделей с фолбэками.

🔥15👍65👏1

26 May 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,970 views51 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Продолжаем про React. Если бы я сейчас пересобирал старую лекцию про React, я бы начал не с FPS. Тогда я заходил через плавность интерфейса: пользователь нажал кнопку, ввёл текст, открыл попап — интерфейс должен ответить без подвисаний. Это всё ещё правда. Но сейчас я бы быстрее переходил к другому вопросу: какую работу пользователь должен увидеть сразу, а какая может подождать. Старый заход

🔥31👍164

25 May 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,680 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwTg8o2Photo

«Кто-то должен был это сказать!» — эта мысль не покидала нас, пока слушали новый сезон подкаста «Свободный слот» 🌟 В нём коллеги из Авито говорят на темы, которых лиды стараются избегать: от переоценки собственных сил и одиночества до тревоги по поводу AI. А ещё у ребят есть канал — там они делятся мыслями, которые не попали в выпуски, полезными статьями и анонсами митапов. Очень советуем заглянуть!

5🤮2👌1👍1👏1

23 May 2026, 18:41 UTC≈1,880 views158 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Около четырёх лет назад я прочитал лекцию React(продвинутый) в ШРИ. Там был большой разбор про то, как React работает под капотом. Лекция неожиданно для меня хорошо зашла: я-то её планировал на аудиторию студентов ШРИ, а получилось 92к просмотров. До сих пор люди иногда пишут, что именно после неё у них щёлкнуло понимание React, и это меня сильно мотивирует. Потом я надолго почти перестал писать

🔥117👍2214🦄3🙏2

19 May 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,830 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Здарова, работяги! Сегодня разберёмся, в чём боль code-first, что меняет schema-first и как это выглядит в Fastify. Code-first Правила формы данных живут в коде, рассыпанные по разным местам. Валидация — отдельная функция. Типы — отдельный интерфейс. Обе сущности — копии одной и той же правды в разных синтаксисах. Знакомая картина — ручная валидация формы: function validateUserForm(values) { const errors = {}

🔥213👍3🍌2

18 May 2026, 06:23 UTC≈1,680 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Понял, принял, делаем 👨‍💻

🔥23🎉93🍌1

16 May 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,820 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Интересен ли вам еще формат видео(утуб, вквидео и тд) или лучше сконцентрироваться на тг?

  1. Да 🤓83%
  2. Нет, лучше больше постов в тг 🤬17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🍌21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @temaProg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Poll498 voters

Интересен ли вам еще формат видео(утуб, вквидео и тд) или лучше сконцентрироваться на тг?

  1. Да 🤓83%
  2. Нет, лучше больше постов в тг 🤬17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 20 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 638,287 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТОП - Тёма о программировани” (@temaProg), 2,858 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/temaProg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.