Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚠️ BLACKLIST of SCAMMERS ⚠️

Channel

⚠️ BLACKLIST of SCAMMERS ⚠️

@telegipsy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

53subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003743174439
TypeChannel
Username@telegipsy
Created17 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/telegipsy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4553497 August 2026 — 45 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45 subscribers7 October 2026 — 53 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 61 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 20:2253+8
10 Aug 2026, 15:1645no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:2945first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC378 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

This guy called “Betfair Fix Community” is selling his page. Be very careful: he is a scammer. Many guys have said that he is not paying his debts, and now he wants to sell the page. SHARE THIS MESSAGE AROUND AND WARN AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE

23 May 2026, 23:30 UTC181 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Of course, a username can be changed. That is why we are thinking about creating a bot that sends an alert every time a reported scammer changes their username. In other words, we would receive a notification whenever a scammer tries to hide behind a new username. I will propose this project to other anti-scam channels, so we can fund it together and build a stronger protection system for the whole community.

❤4

23 May 2026, 23:22 UTCviews —

⚠️ BLACKLIST of SCAMMERS ⚠️ pinned «🔐 HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF 1️⃣ No deposit, no stake. Never use your own money for someone you only know online. 2️⃣ Do not trust someone just because the first bets went well. A few good days are not proof of honesty. They may simply be preparing a bigger…»

23 May 2026, 23:21 UTC149 viewsread 10 August 2026

🛡 PREVENTING A SCAM IS THE BEST POSSIBLE WAY TO PROTECT YOURSELF. This is not the first anti-scam channel on Telegram. The more anti-scam channels there are, the better. But, just like in politics, they try to solve the problem only at the end, by reporting names (which is important, of course) but at that point, the damage has already been done. We need to solve the problem at its root, from the very beginning. …

23 May 2026, 23:07 UTC124 viewsread 10 August 2026

🔐 HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF 1️⃣ No deposit, no stake. Never use your own money for someone you only know online. 2️⃣ Do not trust someone just because the first bets went well. A few good days are not proof of honesty. They may simply be preparing a bigger scam. 3️⃣ Ask for at least 10 recent winning tickets. Check dates, stakes and consistency. But remember: screenshots can be edited or stolen. 4️⃣ Check their rep…

23 May 2026, 22:50 UTC107 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚨 RED FLAGS OF SCAMMERS Be careful if someone: ❌ Contacts you first offering betting information or asking you to stake for them. ❌ They promise “100% safe” matches that never lose or claim that information from their “main source” has never lost and will never lose. (Me also involved in fixed matches can never say “100% guaranteed” match. And I am telling you from my 13 years of professional experience: I have s…

❤2

23 May 2026, 22:18 UTC111 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Every day, people contact me offering to place bets for me and sometimes asking me to stake for them. Most of these situations are obvious scams. I can recognise many of them because of my experience in this environment. But I want to be honest with you: even I have been caught in bad situations before. It happened recently too, after months of collaboration with someone I thought I could trust 🚨 ONE OF THE MOST C…

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @telegipsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚠️ BLACKLIST of SCAMMERS ⚠️” (@telegipsy), 53 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telegipsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.