Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Telega.in | Нативная реклама в Telegram и MAX

@telegain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,047subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001080202201
TypeChannel
Username@telegain
DescriptionTelega.in — платформа для автоматизации рекламы в Telegram и МАХ Бот уведомлений: @telega_adv_bot Поддержка: @telegamain_bot telega.in
Created1 October 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/telegain

Growth

16,04616,06116,053.55 August 2026 — 16,061 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,061 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,058 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,051 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,046 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,047 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,046 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,048 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,047 subscribers16,0475 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,044–16,063 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:2616,047-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:4116,048+2
10 Aug 2026, 07:2716,046-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:5116,047+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:3116,046-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:5016,051-7
6 Aug 2026, 12:1116,058-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:1916,061no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1016,061first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 16,047 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held15 (18 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total10,234
Reactions total340
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
695
Videos
30
Links
862

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

517 reactions across 15 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10119.5%
🔥7213.9%
🤩5410.4%
❤‍🔥438.32%
custom 5438362928216576728316.00%
🏆295.61%
👏295.61%
🐳214.06%
👍183.48%
😎183.48%
173.29%
🥰173.29%
🦄132.51%
122.32%
👻91.74%
💯91.74%
👌50.967%
🎉40.774%
👀40.774%
😍40.774%
3 further kinds71.35%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
6.67%
1 of 15 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,480
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,460
over 14 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHDTHTF131 July 202631 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC514 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥8custom 543836292821657672854

5 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,670 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤩2812👻7custom 54383629282165767287👀3🆒1

31 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,950 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📍 Локальный бизнес в Telegram и МАХ: как дотянуться до тех, кто рядом Кафе, салону или студии не нужны миллионы охватов — нужны люди из соседних кварталов, которые могут прийти сегодня. Поэтому локальные каналы Telegram и MAX часто дают брендам быстрый результат за счёт точного попадания в географию и контекст, а не за счёт масштаба. С чего начать продвижение локального бренда ➡️ 🔵 Определите цель рекламы: визиты

🤩13🐳11🔥9custom 543836292821657672854🦄4

31 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,480 views106 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHDTHTFPhoto

У бизнеса появился ещё один must-have — бот в MAX 📲 MAX для многих уже стал основным мессенджером: клиенты читают, пишут и покупают именно там. А боты и автоворонки там пока редкость — механики, приевшиеся в Telegram, работают как новые. Как настроить чат-бота в MAX без программистов за 3 шага — в карусели от BotHelp. Листайте и сохраняйте 👇 ➡ Забрать бесплатный пошаговый гайд Реклама. ООО «Ботхелп». ИНН: 3257037

👏28🏆25😎18🥰16🔥15🤝4

28 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,190 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

☀️ Все в отпусках и на цифровом детоксе? Не в Telegram Заглянули в индекс читаемости каналов — по всем тематикам каталога Telega.in зелёная зона, общий индекс 0,96. Аудитория сейчас читает каналы активнее, чем в среднем за последние два месяца 📈 Собираетесь запускать кампанию? Момент удачный для всех тематик. ➡️ Проверить индекс читаемости Telegram

🔥27🐳106❤‍🔥4custom 54383629282165767284🤓1

16 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,860 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🪣Инфлюенс-маркетинг в 2026: тренды, продажи и реальные кейсы 🗓 23 июля | 🕒 14:00 (МСК) Инфлюенс-маркетинг давно перестал быть только про охваты. Брендам важно понимать, какие блогеры, каналы и форматы действительно приводят клиентов, заявки и продажи. 🔥 На бесплатной онлайн-конференции Vitamin.tools и Telega.in разберём, как меняется рынок и какие подходы работают в 2026 году.  В программе: 🔘Как меняются блогеры,

👍10💯87🦄7🤩5😍4

14 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,570 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✈ Выжать максимум из Telegram: рекламные стратегии на 2026 год 🗓 16 июля | 🕒 16:00 (МСК) Telegram остается сильной площадкой для продвижения бизнеса, но в 2026 уже недостаточно просто выбрать канал с хорошими охватами. 🎯Чтобы реклама приводила заявки и продажи, важно понимать, где смотреть качество аудитории и какие механики работают под разные задачи. На бесплатном вебинаре Telega.in Нина Шендрик расскажет: 🔵по

94🎉4👏1💯1🥰1

9 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,460 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔍 Все данные о каналах Telegram и MAX в одной аналитике Подписчики, охваты, вовлечённость, цена контакта в нише: всё это стоит оценить до запуска кампании. Для этого в Telega.in есть аналитика по каналам Telegram и MAX. В июне она принесла нам премию CPC.Awards в номинации «Лучший сервис для аналитики Telegram- и MAX-каналов» 🏆 Что внутри: 🔘 аналитика 700 000+ каналов Telegram и MAX: охват, вовлечённость, динамика

7🔥5custom 54383629282165767283❤‍🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,300 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Запускайте перфоманс-рекламу в МАХ с оплатой за клик Теперь ИП и юрлица могут запускать Смарт-кампании в MAX с целью «клики» прямо из кабинета Telega.in — с бюджетом от 50 000 ₽. В одном запуске вы получаете: 🔘клики по заданной вами цене; 🔘охваты по цене вдвое ниже стандартной. Как запустить Смарт-кампанию самостоятельно? 1⃣ Откройте раздел: Сервисы → Смарт-кампании или Мои проекты → Смарт-кампании. 2⃣ Внесите н

❤‍🔥96custom 543836292821657672842🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,310 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Как продвигать онлайн-школы в MAX и Telegram — расскажем на «Белой конфе» Уже завтра, 7 июля в 17:00, в потоке «Сервисы онлайн-образования» выступят CEO/CFO Telega.in Дмитрий Мацкевич и директор по коммуникациям Ксения Пивоварова. 💬 Тема — «Продвижение онлайн-школ в MAX и Telegram в 2026». Разберём свежее исследование АРИР и Telega.in, кейсы с цифрами и чек-лист эффективной кампании. Будете на конференции — прих

128👌5

3 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,420 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚩 Мы тоже залезли повыше, чтобы все увидели: Смарт-кампании теперь от 150 000 ₽ Запускайте перфоманс в Telegram и МАХ с меньшим стартовым бюджетом. Оставить заявку →

11🤩5🏆4custom 54383629282165767283👻1🦄1

1 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,460 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

«В Telegram и МАХ это не продать🙅‍♂» — так думают про B2B, SaaS, недвижимость и всё с длинным циклом сделки. На деле посевы в таких нишах работают, но заходить надо через ценность и короткие шаги до заявки, а не через продажу в лоб. Главные принципы собрали в карточке ☝️ А вот как это выглядит на практике ➡ SaaS-сервис BotFAQtor тестировал Telegram через Telega.in. Первый запуск с чек-листом дал трафик, но слабую

9❤‍🔥65

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @telegain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 915,155 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Telega.in | Нативная реклама в Telegram и MAX” (@telegain), 16,047 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telegain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.