Channel
@telega_tinder
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,909subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001656546382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @telega_tinder |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/telega_tinder |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 2,909 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 2,915 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 2,916 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 2,917 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
301 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 186 | 61.8% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5307548270308895131 | 27 | 8.97% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 3.32% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.66% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 0.997% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.332% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telega_tinder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2025 to 11 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
TELEGA TINDER откинула копыта, но мы то знаем, что это было затишье перед бурей🤭 ЛЕГЕНДАРНОЕ ВОЗВРАЩЕНИЕ, но уже в новом формате и той же миссией — объединять людей! За меньше, чем год, одна из нас продвинула комьюнити городов Сибири, собрав 15.000 людей И теперь мы выходим на Москву, чтобы собрать в комьюнити еще больше людей! Для реального общения, знакомств, встреч и проявления 🫂 Будем договариваться о встреч…
❤7
Мы тут ушли в отрыв немного 😅 Кто не знает, у Ани завтра свадьба! Вчера были на девичнике) Самое интересное, что на свадьбу прилетели @lelya_one @nastya_profotovna девочки, с которыми мы познакомились через телеграм, одна у нас продукты покупала, другая работала с нами и вот 💙 Немного контента из нашей жизни, приехали в Красноярск! И в какой же раз убеждаемся, что онлайн объединяет🫶🏽 Как вам такой лайф контент?😅
❤24🔥14👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤12🔥10
Наглядный пример того, как не надо продавать 🫣 Первое сообщение от человека было с расхвалением постов в канале, который не ведется уже очень давно 🤣 После уже в лоб был написано сообщение о том, что нет нужды в услугах, но человек продолжает настаивать на своем Хотя было сказано, что канал вестись не будет, а в ответ предлагают сделать первый закуп рекламы на 5-10к на канал, который пустует и собирается пустовать…
❤22🔥6custom 53075482703088951313
Результаты розыгрыша: Победители: 1. Рокси (5954604202) 2. Даша (1175906518) 3. Valeria (6650531027) 4. Ela (7654512462) 5. Elena (7513538738) 6. Света Dior 💎 (7035072382) 7. Арина (7372319847) 8. Almira (311531788)
❤4
Мы решили затестить классный способ продвижения 🔥 Вспомнили, что больше года назад этот способ пользовался спросом, но потом затих и многие про него забыли… И вот мы решили объединиться с коллегами и продвинуться с помощью розыгрыша (каждый от себя дарит какую-то ценную услугу/обучение), выше вы его, кстати, видели) Результат пока: 30+ подписчиков 😍 Порой самые классные методы продвижения и результативные - это х…
❤8
🎁 ДАРИМ ПОДАРКИ 🎁 от экспертов и брендов для твоей проявленности и развития блога 🩷 Подарки от нас, которые каждая из вас может выиграть: 1️⃣ Тренинг по проявленности и выходу в медиа стоимостью 10.000 от @leronyyyd 2️⃣ Выступление онлайн в женском клубе стоимостью 25.000 @leronymoneyclub 3️⃣ Разбор вашего канала от @alenatalking 4️⃣ Сертификат на любую встречу женского клуба от @balance_wclub 5️⃣ Доступ к баз…
❤10
Нам кто-то накручивает просмотры 🤡 Недавно на один из наших каналов была атака подписок от ботов (20к штук), а теперь смотрим на наш этот канал и на одном из постов 1,2к просмотров Нормально вообще и вопрос, кому это надо и зачем?)))
❤6custom 53075482703088951315🔥4
Почему у одних все легко получается, а у других нет? Знаете, что мы часто обсуждаем лично? Особенно когда в Новосибирске встретились вот на днях 😂 У нас один и тот же брейншторм — почему у одних людей легко получается привлекать подписчиков и зарабатывать, а другие будто бьются головой об стену, хотя вроде делают то же самое? Вот это главный парадокс инфобизнеса😅 🟣Кто-то запускает пост и тут же продажи, ажиотаж …
❤11
Если вы нас потеряли, то мы на месте ❤️ Ничего не случилось, мы все также горим нашим сообществом TELEGA TINDER, но просто сейчас время для отдыха🫂 Мы вот встретились в Новосибирске, сидим пьем раф медовик-черника и болтаем о важном ❤️ Возможно скоро вернемся с движами и ярким контентом, а пока вайб лета на 10000% А вы как? Как лето?
❤13🔥8custom 53075482703088951311
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7custom 53075482703088951313🔥2
Тот самый момент, когда многие эксперты ненавидят других за это🫠 Потому что не понимают как это?? Вот сидишь продаешь, продаешь, а продаж нет. Мы на прошлой неделе выложили всего 2 поста и то, не продающих 😅 а у нас 4 продажи 🔵1 человек купили практикум по продвижению 🔵3 человека купили помогатор по рекламе Вот что значит продажи без продаж и выстроенная воронка! А знаете все почему? — У нас есть классная упако…
❤5🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @telega_tinder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 366,875 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@telega_tinder named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TELEGA TINDER” (@telega_tinder), 2,909 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telega_tinder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.