Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

☬╣𝕿𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖒𝖔𝖓 𝕭𝖑𝖔𝖌╠☬ (архив)

@telablog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003779464216
TypeChannel
Username@telablog
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/telablog

Growth

646564.510 Aug 2026, 20:16 — 65 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:04 — 64 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:1611 Aug 2026, 04:04
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:0464-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:1665first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.7%
avg views ÷ 64 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.9
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 202625 July 2026)
Views total311
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026

🌟 — кака

Signed 𓏻‌݂۪۫᪾𓎟ࣽ͜ꘓᩘ ‌‌ᩫؕ𝙗᪾ᮬۜ𝐥𑄝ۣ፝֟᥊'ᥡ𓂂꯭࡙ 𑣩‌‌፝֟𑣨ܸ۟𓏼 ⵓ An⃟𝖽 𝗈𝗻ᘿ

25 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026

Да каво, я мечтал об этом давно, я больше по своему блогу по бургердептам ням ням

25 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. Удаляй блог19%
  2. Пусть будет архив81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

🌟 — владелец не вознесетсч

Signed 𓏻‌݂۪۫᪾𓎟ࣽ͜ꘓᩘ ‌‌ᩫؕ𝙗᪾ᮬۜ𝐥𑄝ۣ፝֟᥊'ᥡ𓂂꯭࡙ 𑣩‌‌፝֟𑣨ܸ۟𓏼 ⵓ An⃟𝖽 𝗈𝗻ᘿ

25 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «☬╣𝕿𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖒𝖔𝖓 𝕭𝖑𝖔𝖌╠☬ (архив)»

21 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC48 viewsread 10 August 2026

#вп_блокси

Signed 𑣩‌‌፝֟𑣨ܸ۟ ﹫β‌ׄ᷼‌λ᥆ꉼɏ‿۪‌፝𓏼 #𝖫𝗈𝗅𝗂_𝗄𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋 ♡゙‌ #𝖺𝗇𝖽_𝗈𝗇𝖾 #𝖣𝖭𝖨́ #таблетки_кисс

21 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC39 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ispcfPhoto

🌟 𝐼𝓉𝓏 𝓈𝓀𝑒𝑒𝓉 𝓅𝓁𝒶𝓎𝓏 ᶜᵒⁿᶠᵉˢˢᶦᵒⁿ ︴ 🙂🙂 🙂🙂 🌟: : Блин, хочу зашарить за итзскит плейз! Кто-то поможет?!! 🌟: : Хочу почитать хедканончики по итзскит плейз!! где найти/написать свой?? 💛: : Нарисовал жирного М3тта, куда можно отправить?...)) Знак0w0?🙂 ⪼ Ͳогда тебе в этот наипрекраснейший кф! 🌟🌟 🌟 \(^○^)人(^○^)/ 🌟 Здесь ты можешь отправить свой контент

Signed 𑣩‌‌፝֟𑣨ܸ۟ ﹫β‌ׄ᷼‌λ᥆ꉼɏ‿۪‌፝𓏼 #𝖫𝗈𝗅𝗂_𝗄𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋 ♡゙‌ #𝖺𝗇𝖽_𝗈𝗇𝖾 #𝖣𝖭𝖨́ #таблетки_кисс

17 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC41 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ForsAskNfPhoto

🤩🤩🤩🤩🅰️🅰️🤩🤩🤩🤩 ----Если вы видите это сообщение, то.. #₽@+/#% ... Вас приглашают в.. #@% ........... ----Я не знаю как попал в этот Аск, но.. @#₽|√[£=... Только я заметил одну странность.. тут.. €°£÷€π=... ----Приветствую тебя в нашем чудесном Нсфв аске по форсакену! Мы ждем именно тебя, поспеши занять роль ;) ❎❎Внимание: мы не несём ответственность за то, что вы зашли в этот канал. Если вы сюда зашли, то вы автоматич

7 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC61 viewsread 10 August 2026

#блоки_вп

Signed :⇉𓏵 ᗷ𝗅᥆́𝗑ᥡ ♡゙‌° . #𝖫𝗈𝗅𝗂_𝗄𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋 #𝖺𝗇𝖽_𝗈𝗇𝖾 #𝖣𝖭𝖨́ #культ_таблеток

7 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ksowowouiePhoto

🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ʙᴀᴄ инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄуᴇᴛ ᴛᴀᴋᴏй ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀж ᴋᴀᴋ 𝘐𝘛𝘙𝘈𝘗𝘗𝘌𝘋?? ʙы хᴏᴛиᴛᴇ ɜᴀдᴀᴛь ᴇʍу ᴨᴀᴩу ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴏʙ и ᴨᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩᴇᴛь 🐈‍⬛ чᴇʍ ᴏн ɜᴀниʍᴀᴇᴛᴄя ʙ ᴨᴏʙᴄᴇднᴇʙнᴏй жиɜни?? ᴏᴛᴧичнᴏ. ➿➿➿➿ 🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐 🌟 - хʍʍ..ᴄᴏɜдᴀᴛь бᴧᴏᴦ?? ᴏчᴇнь ᴄᴏʍниᴛᴇᴧьнᴏᴇ ᴩᴇɯᴇниᴇ ᴋᴏнᴇчнᴏ. нᴏ, я ᴨᴏᴨᴩᴏбую. 〰️〰️〰️🌟〰️〰️〰️

Signed :⇉𓏵 ᗷ𝗅᥆́𝗑ᥡ ♡゙‌° . #𝖫𝗈𝗅𝗂_𝗄𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋 #𝖺𝗇𝖽_𝗈𝗇𝖾 #𝖣𝖭𝖨́ #культ_таблеток

4 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC61 viewsread 10 August 2026

#вп_блокси

Signed :⇉𓏵 ᗷ𝗅᥆́𝗑ᥡ ♡゙‌° . #𝖺𝗇𝖽_𝗈𝗇𝖾 #𝖣𝖭𝖨́ #культ_таблеток

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @telablog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

?

  1. Удаляй блог19%
  2. Пусть будет архив81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,123,414 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☬╣𝕿𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖒𝖔𝖓 𝕭𝖑𝖔𝖌╠☬ (архив)” (@telablog), 64 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telablog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.