Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 47 days, net -2,492. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,863–40,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 18:37
37,237
-271
1 Oct 2026, 19:18
37,508
-638
18 Sept 2026, 08:20
38,146
-104
16 Sept 2026, 03:16
38,250
-53
14 Sept 2026, 09:19
38,303
-91
12 Sept 2026, 16:40
38,394
-122
10 Sept 2026, 17:18
38,516
-143
7 Sept 2026, 13:17
38,659
-136
4 Sept 2026, 13:38
38,795
-50
2 Sept 2026, 23:36
38,845
-72
1 Sept 2026, 21:33
38,917
-54
1 Sept 2026, 00:29
38,971
-75
30 Aug 2026, 22:05
39,046
-66
30 Aug 2026, 01:36
39,112
-55
29 Aug 2026, 00:24
39,167
-71
28 Aug 2026, 00:55
39,238
-39
26 Aug 2026, 23:12
39,277
-71
25 Aug 2026, 22:45
39,348
-84
24 Aug 2026, 20:57
39,432
-129
23 Aug 2026, 07:43
39,561
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
8
Videos
1
Links
186
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,174 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
548
46.7%
👎
210
17.9%
🤬
89
7.58%
💩
73
6.22%
🖕
67
5.71%
👍
34
2.90%
🤡
30
2.56%
🥰
26
2.21%
👏
22
1.87%
😢
17
1.45%
🔥
16
1.36%
🤯
16
1.36%
😁
13
1.11%
💋
5
0.426%
🌭
4
0.341%
💘
4
0.341%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Prompt:-
> The 12-frame grid includes:
> * Close-up portrait
> * Side profile
> * Low angle looking up
> * High angle looking down
> * Over-the-shoulder
> * Wide full-body shot
> * Dutch angle
> * Back view looking at city lights
> * Three-quarter view
> * Macro eye detail
> * Mid-shot leaning on a railing
> * Candid laughing angle.
I have shared this photo with you.
Please create one single image tha…
Refrence video- https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWZBgibk4aM/?igsh=MWZuY3FrcjZuanNwbg==
4k photo enhance prompt👇-
Enhance the portrait while strictly preserving the subject's identity with accurate facial geometry. Do not change their expression or face shape. Only allow subtle feature cleanup without altering who they are.
Keep the exact same background from the reference image. No replacements, no changes, no ne…
Refrence video- https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWROm0dE0ER/?igsh=MWc0MXQxMm5jbHZ6MQ==
Glasses prompt- 👉 Create a 3x2 grid collage of the same young Indian man with styled hair and light beard, wearing different stylish sunglasses in each frame (aviator, round metal, square black, oversized visor, retro brown, modern sporty). Warm golden sunlight, soft shadows, outdoor background with blurred wall pattern. High det…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @techshan01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Powered Tech @poweredtech · 108,272 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 31 August 2026
Hitech Keeda @hitech_keeda · 71,123 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 13 here — alongside 12 others — read 20 August 2026
Tech Tide @techtide19 · 24,542 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 14 September 2026
PRANAV PG @pranavpg1 · 37,758 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“techshan01” (@techshan01), 37,237 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techshan01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.