Channel
@technopath_ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,554subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003075183547 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @technopath_ir |
| Description | «با تکنولوژی، دنیای فردا رو امروز بساز!» 🚀 . با من همراه شو تا با هم دنیای کامپیوتر رو کشف کنیم! 🌟 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/technopath_ir |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 2,554 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,307 |
| Reactions total | 116 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
116 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 69.0% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 17.2% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.45% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۱ خیلیییییی خوشحال بودم 😁👀 و واقعا باورم نمیشید که تونستم یکی از هدف هام رو تیک بزنم و تونسته بودم این لپتاپ رو برای خودم بخرم با درآمد خودم از پیجم 💻🤩 یادمه دوسال پیش ۲۲ میلیون این لپتاپ رو خریده بودم
اولین هدفم رو مرداد ۱۴۰۱ تیک زدم ✅ پنج شش ماه بعد از شروع فعالیتم این پیام هم برای اون زمان توی کانال ادیت لرن ای ارم بود که فوروارد کردم اینجا 😂🙂↔️
حالا قسمت موردعلاقهی داستان من: میدونید اولین درآمد من از این فضا چقدر بود؟ . . . ۱۰۰ هزار تومن 😂😭💸 نه ده میلیون. نه پنجاه میلیون. صد تومن :))) و بامزهتر اینکه همونو دوباره خرج آموزش کردم. 📚😂
👏3💘1
حس کردم باید ویس بگیرم تا حق مطلب ادا بشه😂🙂↔️
❤3👏2
اینستاگرام یه محیط محتوا محوره 📱🎬 یعنی چی؟ 🤔 یعنی برای رشد و برند شدن باید ویدیو بسازی 🎥✨ از کارت 💼 مهارتت 🛠️ تخصصت 🎓 و.. اینستاگرام یه دکمه نداره که بزنی 🚫🔘 سریع پستت بره اکسپلور 🚀 و برات کلی فالور بیاره 👥💫 🆔 @technopath_ir
👏2❤1🔥1
درحالیکه چیزی که تو میبینی معمولاً ویترین زندگی آدمهاست. 🎀✨ شکستهاشون رو کمتر میبینی. 📉 ماههایی که درآمد پایین داشتن رو نمیبینی. 💸 پروژههایی که خراب کردن رو نمیبینی. 🛠️ سالهایی که طول کشیده به اون نقطه برسن رو هم شاید نبینی. ⏳ و گاهی هم بله… رویا فروختن، خودش بخشی از مارکتینگه. 👀💡 🆔 @technopath_ir
❤2🔥1🥰1
چون یه مشکل دیگه هم داریم… اینستاگرامو باز میکنی: یکی ماهی ۳۰۰ میلیون درمیاره 💸 یکی ساعت رولکس خریده 😭 یکی امروز مهاجرت کرده ✈️ یکی ماشین خریده 🚘 یکی ساعت ۵ صبح بیدار شده و تا تو بیدار شی سه تا شرکت تأسیس کرده 😂😭 بعد تو با لباس خونه نشستی: «یعنی فقط منم که هنوز زندگیم درست نشده؟ 👁️👄👁️ 🆔 @technopath_ir
❤6👏1
اشتباه برداشت نکنید هاااا 👀🎀 من نمیگم: «دوره نخرید ❌» خود من برای آموزش هزینه کردم و هنوزم میکنم. 📚💗 آموزش درست میتونه چند ماه آزمونوخطا رو برات کوتاهتر کنه. ولی چیزی که باهاش مشکل دارم این ذهنیته: «این دوره رو بخر = درآمدت تضمین شد.» اینا دوتا چیز کاملاً متفاوتن.🙂↕️ 🆔 @technopath_ir
❤4👏1🔥1
یعنی دوره نخریم؟🙄
و یه سؤال خیلی ساده دارم… 👀 اگه واقعاً یه فرمول وجود داشت که: هرکس > یه دوره بخره > دو ماه تلاش کنه > +۵۰ میلیون درآمد داشته باشه فکر نمیکنید الان وضعیت اقتصادی یکم متفاوت بود؟ 🙂↕️😂 هیچکس نمیتونه نتیجهی مالی مشخصی رو برای همه تضمین کنه. چون آدمها، مهارتها، بازارها و شرایطشون یکی نیست. 🆔 @technopath_ir
❤4👏1
تو این چهار سال: شکست خوردم 🙂 پروژه از دست دادم رزومهم رد شد کار کردم و نتیجه نگرفتم آموزش اشتباه دیدم روش اشتباه امتحان کردم و بارها مجبور شدم از اول یاد بگیرم. یعنی به زبان کاملاً علمی: پوستم کنده شد دوستان 😂🦦🤝🏻 🆔 @technopath_ir
❤4🗿3👏2👨💻1
برای همین وقتی امروز میشنوم: «فقط این دوره رو بخر، دو ماه دیگه درآمدت +۵۰ میلیونه 💸✨» واقعاً نمیتونم راحت از کنارش رد شم.🙂↔️ چون منی که الان میبینید با برندهای مختلف کار میکنم و قرارداد میبندم… چهار ساله دارم مداوم کار میکنم. نه دو ماه. 🥹🤝🏻 🆔 @technopath_ir
❤3🤨3⚡1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @technopath_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 58,287 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مبینا کریمی | مسیر تکنولوژی💻” (@technopath_ir), 2,554 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/technopath_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.