Channel
@techmaxim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
63subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002032288537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @techmaxim |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/techmaxim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 63 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 62 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 62 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 65.8% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @techmaxim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 September 2025 to 23 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Медитация очень важна для магии, потому что в точку, в которой мы сосредоточиваем наше внимание, потечёт и наша энергия. Поэтому, когда ты занимаешься магией, тебе нужно стараться по максимуму сконцентрировать разум лишь на том, чего ты пытаешься достичь. Такова роль медитации — она тренирует твоё сознание, чтобы оно не разлеталось во всевозможных направлениях, рассеивая накопленную энергию. Большинство людей только…
👍1
Как найти свою нишу в создании контента? На примере YouTube. Почему большинство, включая меня, не правильно классифицирует YT контент? YouTube делит весь контент на 14 категорий. Музыка, Гейминг, Образование. Попробуй туда засунуть челлендж. Фитнес-челлендж это фитнес или развлечение? А игровой? Система сыпется, потому что тема и подача свалены в одну кучу. Если их разделить, всё встаёт на место. Три слоя, которые …
🔥2
Как на счет контента на русском языке?
👍2
Muse Spark is live. Meta's first Superintelligence Labs model dropped April 8. It's multimodal, it reasons (Instant vs Thinking mode), and it already powers meta.ai. This replaces Llama. It's closed, it's fast, and it's about to be in every Meta surface you use. The AI race just got interesting again.
We're building Goxi to kill one specific problem: creators guessing what to make next. So we built a public report. You drop in any YouTube channel, we pull the data, and tell you what's actually working. No signup. No email. Just the analysis. Here's one for Richard Yu -> https://goxi.ai/report/youtube/@RichardYuBusiness His "how-to" videos average 34K views. His "overview" videos do 3.8K. That's not a content pr…
👍2
14 Rules of Startups. Which one do you adhere to? 1. use claude 2. build in public 3. copy what works 4. ship fast 5. talk less 6. demo more 7. find a great co-founder 8. talk to your users 9. document everything 10. never raise desperate 11. traction is your best pitch 12. revenue is the best KPI 13. don’t be afraid to pivot 14. volume negates luck
👍2
👀 Here is what I’m building for now. Just 3 weeks in, but we already have solid traction. YouTubers hit a wall after their first 10 videos - they don’t know what to make next. The data exists, but creators can’t read it. Agencies can, but they charge $3-10K/month. Goxi delivers agency-level strategy for $29 We are starting to raise. If you can connect us with the right early-stage investors or angels — my DMs are …
👍3
The distance between “need to make” and “it’s actually work” = infinity.
Everyone laughs at vibe-coders building todo lists. They are building simplest project to know how it works. But stop. What if these people are actually trying to solve the real BIG problem - "what exactly should I do next?" Because that's the actual crisis. Not the code. The chaos. We're all drowning in notes, tabs, bookmarks, voice memos, screenshots of things we'll "get back to." Fragmented data everywhere. Zero…
🔥2
I feel like a social addicted junky. I caught myself checking Instagram before my feet hit the floor this morning. Eyes half-shut. Thumb already scrolling. I wasn't looking for anything. That's the worst part. There was no notification, no message, no reason. Just the reflex. Like phantom calls. I put the phone down. Went for a walk with my dog Hiro. Picked it up again in elevator. I used to judge people who sa…
👍1
It gets easier. Every day it gets a little easier. But you gotta do it every day. That’s the hard part. But it does get easier.
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @techmaxim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“the world is yours” (@techmaxim), 63 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/techmaxim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.