Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Текондрус | гитара

@tecguitar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,124subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929740070
TypeChannel
Username@tecguitar
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tecguitar

Growth

1,1191,1241,121.56 August 2026 — 1,119 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,121 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,118–1,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:441,124+3
9 Aug 2026, 18:251,121+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:511,120+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:391,119first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.3%
avg views ÷ 1,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
486
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held9 (15 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total4,378
Reactions total188
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9651.1%
👍4423.4%
custom 54473670307998775373920.7%
❤‍🔥42.13%
😁42.13%
👎10.532%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC217 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Неплохой денёк! Весьма продуктивно поснимали для шоу «Пробирка». Для нового выпуска про русский рок мне выпала задача показать, что интересного можно откопать в этом жанре. Вопрос, что такое русский рок — открытый, но я показал, что мне нравится: Каспарян, ранний Сплин, ещё кое-что интересное. Как только выпуск выложат — обязательно с вами поделюсь, познавательно получилось. Отдельное открытие дня — насколько легко

👍8🔥7custom 54473670307998775373

30 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC384 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Было непросто, но я наконец создал свой блог в Бусти. Пока там не очень много материала, но уже есть всякие уникальные штуки 🎸 Например, табы к моему треку Launch Song, которыми уже интересовались несколько человек (что само по себе потрясающе, я до сих пор в восторге). А ещё развернутый гайд по пентатонике, где вообще всё собрано в один пост: большие видосы, пояснения, посты из телеграм-канала и инфографика. Кор

🔥10👍6custom 54473670307998775374

26 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC503 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня на занятии со студентом такая вот картиночка оформилась, делюсь 👌🏻 Дело, как обычно, в музыкальной свободе и импровизации. Традиционно напоминаю: музыка — это язык. И лексикон мы обогащаем, разбираясь в концепциях и способах построения мелодий. Например, один из подходов — понимание гаммы, то есть последовательности «возможных» нот. Можно играть гамму целиком, делать скачки, развороты, менять ритм, добавлят

custom 544736703079987753711🔥9👍4

24 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC468 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пожарил с кайфом 🍄 Эти, правда, из магаза, но начинает формироваться стойкое желание сходить за грибами. Кто шарит — уже пора или надо августа подождать? #жизотека

👍9custom 54473670307998775374🔥3

23 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC551 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Соляга с последнего выступления в электричестве 🎸 Вертухи — имба. Особенно в роке: для развития соло работают безотказно. Вообще обратил внимание, что у меня выработалась определённая схема, которой я стараюсь придерживаться, особенно в роковых жанрах: первая треть — возня, вторая — бенды, третья — вертухи Естественно, это очень приблизительное распределение — на практике всё плавно перетекает одно в другое, а по

🔥8👍7custom 54473670307998775373👎1

19 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC568 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Второй раз за лето выполз покататься на велике 🤘 Вот бывает ощущение, что всё как-то со скрипом — и от любого движа хочется отказаться. А ты соглашаешься — и сразу жизнь бодрее идёт. Свежие впечатления, конечно, полезная пища для мозга, не стоит пренебрегать ауф. С кайфом прокатился с Богданом (басист Velcrocranes) и его компанией по маршруту «Королёв — Яуза — Лосиный Остров — Сокольники». Ловите фотокарточки! Бог

🔥14❤‍🔥4custom 54473670307998775374

18 Jul 2026, 00:06 UTC624 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

#библиотека

🔥15custom 54473670307998775376👍4

17 Jul 2026, 23:34 UTC526 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Иии... снова пентатоника 🎸 Короче, собрал все необходимые сведения в один файлик. В основном здесь материалы из предыдущих постов, но ведь неплохо иметь под рукой всё сразу? Тут и построение пентатоники от любого звука. И «основные» позиции с их диагональными вариантами. Конечно, добавил соло The Beatles, которое играется в этих диагоналях. Кто уже учил — отличный повод повторить ;) Ну и ещё всякое — вроде адапт

🔥18custom 54473670307998775373👍2😁1

15 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC537 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Съездил на этих выходных на «Бессонницу». С лекцией в итоге не сложилось, но оно и к лучшему. Вспомнилась на этот счёт цитата из «Форреста Гампа»: «Однажды начался дождь и не прекращался четыре месяца. За это время мы узнали все виды дождя: прямой дождь, косой дождь, горизонтальный дождь и даже дождь, который идёт снизу вверх». Так что условия были не особо лекционные 😁 А вообще было классно. Я стараюсь не строит

🔥12👍4😁3custom 54473670307998775371

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @tecguitar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 53,645 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Текондрус | гитара” (@tecguitar), 1,124 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tecguitar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.