Preference of sons over daughters huiop @ Google Why do most people still prefer sons in this day and age? @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies

Channel
Blind Feed
@teamblind_feed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003851646363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teamblind_feed |
| Description | Top posts from teamblind.com |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teamblind_feed |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 5 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 5 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.0%
- avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,010
- Links
- ≈15,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Happy to share OpenAI question notes anonious @ Undisclosed Comment below I’ll DM you Edit: I don’t have any notes. The people begging below are losers @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
Here we go again with layoffs at Oracle... uOkuyw1R @ Oracle It's not long till I die of a heart attack in here at Oracle. Layoffs dates are supposedly to be at September 15th. I heard rumors that there will be layoffs in August not a while ago and now people are saying September. I honestly was quite relieved at first when I heard there will be no layoffs in August but like a rollercoaster the anxiety hit right ba…
Atlassian/Figma/Roblox QwvC68 @ Atlassian Currently at Atlassian, have Figma (remote) and Roblox (hybrid - have to relocate) offers @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
Interviewing is dead as we know it regalped @ DoorDash Just got scooped up overnight by the ai overlords. they dont want you to apply to them. they notice. they pull. without any interview. just on the basis of your work and behavior. welcome to the ideal times. leetcode is dead. i like the tune of 2027 and beyond. love. live. laugh. bye @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
Food at meta gave me long term intestinal issues I'm still dealing with Strwberrry @ ex-Microsoft And it's only gotten worse. Company should just support local businesses. @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
Rate my net worth. limeplum @ Meta 10 years in the industry. Started Meta recently so I didn’t see the upside of $META. NW includes cash, stocks, vested stocks, and 401ks. I’ll only include the years I started as a senior. 2022 - $400k 2023 - $600k 2024 - $800k 2025 - $1.2m 2026 - $1.6m Poll (177 participants) - Bad: 17.5%, 31 votes - Ok: 23.7%, 42 votes - Good: 35.6%, 63 votes - Amazing: 23.2%, 41 votes @team…
Sign severance agreement? oanah @ Salesforce In order to get my severance package requires me to sign an agreement which seems extremely unfavorable to me (in perpetuity non disparagement, no hire, non compete, give up any legal recourse, settle disagreements with mediator instead of court...) Is this common in the industry? Has anyone run it by a lawyer for sanity checking? Would I be crazy to refuse to sign it…
How dire is my financial situation? fish 🐠 @ Lyft Age: 31 Salary: 420k Expenses: 72k / year Checking account: 12k HYSA: 181k Bonds: 11.5k 401k: 475k Taxable brokerage accounts: 1.15M Property: none At first glance, I only have 2 months living expenses in my checking account if income stops. Poll (291 participants) - 1/5 - worst: 31.6%, 92 votes - 2/5: 4.1%, 12 votes - 3/5: 9.6%, 28 votes - 4/5: 20.3%, 59 votes …
How to be perfect? Lmsqzepssy @ Apple In 2026, you do a single mistake and you’re out. In short you need to nail 5-6 rounds of interview perfectly. Being asked a programming question? Good luck if you didn’t come up with the most optimal solution and the white box testing suit with 100% statement coverage. How do you even get offers? @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
If you were a U.S. Citizen… balcnx @ Microsoft If you were a U.S. Citizen or Permanent Resident, would you care about getting laid off? TC: 330K YOE: 9 Poll (174 participants) - Yes, I’m worried about landing another job: 55.7%, 97 votes - No, gives me a lot more room: 20.7%, 36 votes - Hellll no, I wouldn’t give a shit: 23.6%, 41 votes @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
OpenAI/Anthropic bcqtm @ Airbnb Has anyone made it to OAI or Anthropic after they were rejected once? @teamblind_feed · ⚡ View replies
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @teamblind_feed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 579,507 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blind Feed” (@teamblind_feed), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamblind_feed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.