Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анита Модестова | Свобода преподавать

Channel

Анита Модестова | Свобода преподавать

@teacherpreneurs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,487subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001139462396
TypeChannel
Username@teacherpreneurs
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/teacherpreneurs

Growth

2,4862,4872,486.57 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,486 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,486–2,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:242,487+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:332,486-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:022,487first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.36%
avg views ÷ 2,487 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,586
Reactions total231
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8034.6%
😁4619.9%
🔥3615.6%
😱166.93%
❤‍🔥125.19%
🥰93.90%
🦄73.03%
52.16%
💯52.16%
🎉41.73%
🥴31.30%
👏20.866%
💋20.866%
🤝20.866%
👍10.433%
💔10.433%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC79 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче, я довольно много заморачиваюсь 🙂 Именно поэтому я прекрасно вижу, когда слишком заморачиваются мои участники курсов - и могу это понять, принять и помочь скорректировать! ❤️ Но про бешеные деньги, высокую маржу и вечно отдыхающего собственника школы - это не ко мне 😃

💯4

7 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC79 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

7 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026

Честно говоря, я не лучший пример - посмотрите на другие 😃

7 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC78 viewsread 7 August 2026

Анита, спасибо, что пишите об этом:) Еще один гвоздь в крышку гроба идеи "открыть свою школу, нанять преподов и вотэтовотвсе"

7 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC91 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сколько стоит "хранить" записи видео, чтобы они были в удобном месте, открывались, обновлялись и тп. Сейчас у нас, при довольно скромном использовании, активно занят ТЕРРАБАЙТ видеохостинга геткурса. Это около 80-100к в год. И цены у них постоянно растут. Но чтобы курс лежал не записями, а как курс, конечно, нужна сама платформа - это под 250к. в год на моём тарифе. А чтобы мы могли ответить вам в вотсапе (как на

❤‍🔥63😱1

7 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC127 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сколько стоит выпуск видео-контента Сейчас когда все вокруг активно делают контент - сами снимают и сами монтируют, мало кто считает свои, а уж тем более, чужие, деньги правильно. Посчитаем? Рилс простенький, неигровой: • одна идея-мысль - продумать -30 - написать сценарий, • снять - накраситься, свет-кадр, допустим, 15 минут, если снимать пачками, • смонтировать с субтитрами - 15 минут - если что-то простое (или

😁10😱9💯1

6 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC170 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Откуда узнали об Аните и/или Teachers Teach Teachers подкаст Дмитрия Никитина (май 2024) помню, я тогда летела в Москву и слушала подкаст в самолёте, потом в Москве перешла на ютуб канал Аниты и в итоге на фоне слушала только её дней 5, мне кажется я посмотрела все популярные видео. Это была точка невозврата к прошлому стилю воспринятия себя как профессионала) Из ответа на анкету участника курса "Свобода Преподават

7

6 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC188 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я сейчас в общении со всеми использую принципы ЛП. Нет такого количества конфликтов. Я стала терпимее, добрее, женственнее. Я сначала думала, что другое помогло мне измениться, но нет, всё-таки ЛП.😁 One love.❤️

❤‍🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC199 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в разговоре вспомнила вот этот сериал - и вам про него тоже расскажу! Мне ужасно понравился - погрузил меня в мир историй Диккенса с потрясающими актёрами. Некоторые из них потом играли ещё в Войне и Мире BBC - и было интересно сравнить их игру. Атмосферный, очень грустный и красивый сериал - Dickensian.

6

5 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC237 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лексический подход в отношениях с мужем Я много пишу о том, что открытие ЛП поменяло в моей жизни очень многое, в основном, это касалось вещей связанных с моей работой. А вот недавно муж отметил ещё одно - уже личное изменение. Моя любимая техника - не исправление ошибок, а переформулирование сказанного в «как сказать лучше (language upgrade) и я не заметила, как внедрила её в жизнь. А заметил - муж! Как-то я обсу

29🥰5👍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTCviews —

Анита Модестова | Свобода преподавать pinned «Дорогие новые подписчики этого канала, а откуда вы сюда пришли? »

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @teacherpreneurs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

Дорогие новые подписчики этого канала, а откуда вы сюда пришли?

  1. Из Ютуба43%
  2. Из Сети с Картинками2%
  3. Из ТГ ТТТ3%
  4. Из ВК8%
  5. Из ТГ коллеги10%
  6. А кто же его знает25%
  7. Я, вот, тоже недоумеваю, как я здесь оказалась / оказался10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,907 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анита Модестова | Свобода преподавать” (@teacherpreneurs), 2,487 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teacherpreneurs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.