#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 中国大事件/中文日记 📢 缅北大事件曝光 📢 【新事件】东南亚曝光l新闻l吃瓜🅥 📢 东南亚曝光吃瓜 新闻 📢 全球新闻聚焦 | 📣国际热点速报 📢 全球新闻事件 📢 Telegram-环球新闻时讯 📢 事件曝光 新闻爆料 📢 全球新闻曝光💥大事件 📢 石家庄春园 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励

Channel
斯里兰卡大事件 | 东南亚新闻 曝光 缅甸 老挝
@tc365
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
61,529subscribers
-41,892 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001913598015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @dashijian998 @tc365 |
| Description | #斯里兰卡 #东南亚 #新闻 #曝光 #缅甸 #老挝 #柬埔寨 #华人资讯 官方讨论群: @SLLK899 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 95 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tc365 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:21 | 61,529 | no change |
| 11 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 61,529 | -301 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 61,830 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 08:17 | 61,830 | -217 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:30 | 62,047 | -78 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 62,125 | -144 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:46 | 62,269 | -73 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 22:44 | 62,342 | -116 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:11 | 62,458 | -88 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:47 | 62,546 | -120 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:29 | 62,666 | no change |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:04 | 62,666 | -129 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:37 | 62,795 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:16 | 62,795 | -353 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:26 | 63,148 | no change |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:27 | 63,148 | -86 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 63,234 | -21 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 63,255 | -361 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:10 | 63,616 | -151 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:10 | 63,767 | first reading |
Engagement
1,761 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.814%
- avg views ÷ 61,529 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 501
- 345 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.395%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 345
- of 1,761 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 345 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,761 (7 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 172,728 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17,600
- Videos
- ≈4,390
- Links
- ≈6,860
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6h 02m
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 446 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
385 reactions across 257 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 17.4% | |
| 🤩 | 46 | 11.9% | |
| ⚡ | 44 | 11.4% | |
| 🎉 | 43 | 11.2% | |
| 😁 | 42 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 9.87% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 9.87% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 8.83% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 8.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 257 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 September 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tc365. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 September 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 345 posts held from the last 30 days (0.58%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
在 Telegram 里找内容,先打开 SOSO 搜搜。 频道、群组、帖子、贴纸都可以搜;也可以从发现页继续浏览。 🔗 本频道专属邀请链接 https://t.me/sososo?start=autopromo_-1001913598015_7340609662_21b6c736
#平台曝光 网友称,11月5日凌晨在97彩世界存入3.8万元,曾赢至6万元并成功提现3万元。之后再次存款,赢至6.8万元时却遇到提现受阻。平台先以出款系统升级为由,让其中午再申请提现;随后审核至下午6点显示失败,并要求联系上级。网友表示始终无法联系上级。此后账户余额降至2.4万元,仍无法提款。该网友提醒其他用户谨慎远离97彩世界。 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
#柬埔寨 一则网络帖文指称,绰号“兔子”的女子涉嫌在柬埔寨西港从事毒品交易,并以星沙湾一期、二期为活动据点。发帖者表示,将向警方等部门提交相关信息,并在国内平台曝光。上述指称尚待核实。 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
#缅北资金盘 一则网帖指称,改名为岩瀬穗子的李磊曾与男友在缅北经营资金盘,之后移居日本,并通过投资和房产洗白资金。帖文还称,相关园区涉嫌贩卖人口、强迫员工长时间工作,造成多人伤亡,并呼吁有关部门调查。以上内容目前仅为网帖说法,尚待核实。 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
❤1
#柬埔寨诈骗 一则网络爆料称,七星海及财通园区相关人员胡启军自2018年起在柬埔寨经营面向中国人的资金盘项目,相关公司2020年至2026年累计涉案金额据称达29亿元。爆料还称,其旗下项目涉及“军人包装精聊2.1”诈骗,经营窝点分布于七星海、海通园区、金贝三园区及中国城金水园区,并涉嫌诱骗投资、贩卖人口和虐待员工。爆料指控公司拖欠工资、限制员工人身自由并殴打员工,还称胡启军曾在财通园区打死一名员工。上述指控尚待核实;爆料称其公司目前仍在柬埔寨活动。 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
#柬埔寨资金盘 一名网友发文指称,化名“#小钢牙”、真名陈雨浓的人曾在柬埔寨一家资金盘公司担任主管兼代理。帖文称,该公司从缅甸迁至柬埔寨,涉及安博、荣晖两个资金盘项目,曾在菩萨红河园区运营,后搬至财通金运2。 发帖者称,员工遭到压榨、殴打和体罚,部分人还被限制人身自由;盘口结束后,陈雨浓及其手下被指卷走员工工资,涉款数百万元。上述内容均为帖文指控,尚待核实。 发帖者表示,已收集相关资料,准备提供给受害者,并呼吁有关部门介入调查,核查资金盘、强迫劳动及人口贩卖等指控。 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
#BYY游戏平台 BYY游戏平台被曝代理佣金结算争议,玩家提现受阻后疑遭客服拉黑 近期,关于BYY游戏平台的争议接连出现,代理和玩家均反映遇到问题。 有代理表示,合作期间佣金结算经常被拖延,部分费用也在未获合理解释的情况下被扣除。多次询问后,平台始终未给出清晰说法,结算问题也迟迟没有妥善解决。 此外,有玩家反映,自己在BYY游戏平台赢钱后申请提现,却遭到阻碍。联系在线客服询问原因,不仅没有得到明确答复,之后还被客服拉黑,沟通渠道随之中断。 代理佣金结算和玩家正常提现都是平台运营中的基本问题。希望BYY针对相关争议作出明确解释,说明佣金扣款依据、结算时间,以及玩家提现受阻的具体原因。 目前相关情况仍有待进一步核实。涉及的代理和玩家也应妥善保留聊天记录、账户截图及资金往来凭证,以备后续维权。 PS:代理拿不到佣金,玩家提不了款,平台总该出来解释一下吧? 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: …
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 中国大事件/中文日记 📢 缅北大事件曝光 📢 【新事件】东南亚曝光l新闻l吃瓜🅥 📢 东南亚曝光吃瓜 新闻 📢 Telegram-环球新闻时讯 📢 全球新闻事件 📢 全球新闻聚焦 | 📣国际热点速报 📢 事件曝光 新闻爆料 📢 石家庄春园 📢 东南亚人民日报 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励
#电信诈骗 有网友爆料称,来自福建漳平新桥的黄慧聪长期在缅甸妙瓦底及周边园区经营诈骗盘口,并在当地及泰国活动。上述说法尚待核实。 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
#收款纠纷 网友曝光一起收款纠纷:有人声称能提供业务工具,收款后却不再回复。发帖者表示,核查收款地址后,这次算是长了记性 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
#防范诈骗 紧急预警|警惕新型盗 U 套路:TG 红包诱导填写地址,提交后资产可能瞬间被盗。 红包到账后,提现时要求绑定地址;一旦提交,资产就可能被转走。之后还会以“流水不足”为由,诱骗你再转 2000U,实为二次收割! 📣投稿/曝光📣 @SS0011822 🌟更多资讯,敬请关注: @tc365
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,761 posts we hold for @tc365. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 12 posts on @tc365 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 14 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 11 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 30 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 9
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@MK888bot · 10,263770 postsUU8.COM国际官方频道
@uu8com · 11,977148 postsU8国际
@U86680 · 186 postsW国际官方频道 @W123
@WCCGF · 3,34546 postsSOSO搜搜🔞
@SosoCnBot · 262,09423 postsSOSO搜搜
@sososo · 604,98820 postsSOSO搜搜
@sooo · 474,28317 postsSOSO搜搜
@souso · 583,06510 posts魔都德州@Z888
@modudezhou · 1,5537 posts头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 66,7184 posts个人信息档案
@gerendangan13 · 9651 postSpam Info Bot
@SpamBot · 34,410,7041 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@tc365 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 6 posts, 10 September 2026 – 21 October 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“斯里兰卡大事件 | 东南亚新闻 曝光 缅甸 老挝” (@tc365), 61,529 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tc365.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.