🍲 Домашний уют в каждой ложке! 🍲 Хочешь готовить так же вкусно, как мама? 😍 На нашем канале мы собрали лучшие рецепты, которые наполнят твой дом ароматом уюта и тепла! 👩🍳 Что тебя ждёт? 🥘 Простые и быстрые рецепты на каждый день 🍰 Секреты домашних десертов, которые тают во рту 🌿 Полезные лайфхаки для идеального вкуса Готовь с удовольствием и радуй близких! 💕 Подписывайтесь, и пусть ваша кухня станет местом волш…

Channel
Тайная история
@taynihistory
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,271subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002020601588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taynihistory |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taynihistory |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 5,271 | +82 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 5,189 | -29 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 5,218 | -44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 5,262 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 5,271 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.84%
- avg views ÷ 5,271 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 255
- 44 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.642%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,221 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤗 | 9 | 22.5% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 10.0% | |
| 😴 | 4 | 10.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
На кости мамонта — звёздная карта возрастом 30 000 лет В 1978 году в пещере Чокчура под Симферополем археолог А. Столбунов обнаружил отполированную кость с узором из точек и символов. Позже астрофизики признали: это карта звёздного неба Северного полушария эпохи верхнего палеолита. Возраст — около 30 тысяч лет, а некоторые звёзды на ней были открыты лишь недавно. Там же учёный собрал коллекцию наскальных изображени…
Когда-нибудь слышали звук Водяного гонга?! 🌊 Представьте — звук, напоминающий вибрацию самой Вселенной, способен гармонизировать энергии тела. Это не фантастика, а возрождённое древнее знание, которое снова находит своё место в современном мире. ✨ Тайная история
😴2
Скала на Югуртском плато в Тунисе Посмотрите на рисунок её вершины — будто годовые кольца древесины. Учёные называют это горой. Но не похожа ли она скорее на окаменевший пень? 🌿 Тайная история
🤗2
На стене французской церкви обнаружили надпись на древнерусском языке XII века. Случай произошёл в посёлке Понс, в церкви Сен-Вивьен. Надпись состоит из четырёх строк: «Иван писал Завидович, идя к святому Иакову». Как Иван Завидович оказался во Франции? Что привело православного русича в католические земли? 🤔 Тайная история
Древние гробницы на японском острове Окинава Посмотрите на форму и архитектуру этих сооружений — они явно выбиваются из привычного представления о древних постройках. Особенно загадочны плавные изгибы конструкций. Сделать такое вручную, как утверждают учёные, практически нереально — сколько ни объясняй. Тайная история
Останки древнейших гигантов В африканских пустынях исследователи наткнулись на массивные останки людей — настоящих исполинов. Их гигантские кости и черепа веками лежали погребёнными под слоями песка. Неужели это и есть прямое доказательство существования гигантов? 🤯 Тайная история
На карте Америки 1562 года изображена русалка с летающей тарелкой в руке. Рисунок выполнил Диего Гутьерос — известный картограф, исследователь и мореплаватель. Древние карты, как правило, создавались на основе зарисовок путешественников. 🌍🗺️ Тайная история
🤩1
В образце металлического стержня из Хакасии обнаружено от 28% до 75% углерода. Алюминий производят электротермическим способом, поэтому углерод мог проникнуть только из угля. За счёт диффузии и высокого давления в пластах это стало возможным. Само наличие углерода однозначно подтверждает, что возраст детали совпадает с возрастом породы — 300 млн лет. Тайная история
Сколько на самом деле лет пирамиде Джосера? Под сооружением скрыты лабиринты подземных тоннелей протяжённостью 11 км. В XX веке на глубине 50 метров в этих катакомбах обнаружили 40 000 каменных сосудов — из хрусталя, гранита, диорита и других пород, сильно различающихся по твёрдости и сложности обработки. Официально пирамиде приписывают 4 700 лет. Но возраст сосудов оказался старше самой пирамиды Джосера! 🤯 Её прос…
Еще одна находка — стелла возрастом 1200 лет — обнаружена в затопленном древнеегипетском городе Гераклион. Этот камень поражает идеальным состоянием: резьба на песчанике не пострадала, хотя соленая вода, течения и микроорганизмы — крайне агрессивная среда для таких артефактов. Еще загадочнее — язык. Он отчасти схож с речью египтян того времени, но в целом отличается, и пока его не удается расшифровать. Удивительно:…
Под Краснодаром обнаружили кувшин старше 5 тысяч лет! Археологи нашли недалеко от Краснодара древний сосуд, возрастом свыше 5 тысяч лет. Точность оценки подтверждается формой дна — оно яйцеобразное, а не плоское, что характерно для позднего каменного века. Подробнее здесь Такие кувшины, вероятно, использовались в ритуалах и погребальных обрядах того времени. 🏺 Тайная история
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @taynihistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 98,115 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тайная история” (@taynihistory), 5,271 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taynihistory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.