Channel
@taxcodein
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004328368605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taxcodein |
| Created | 7 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taxcodein |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 7 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 6 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 5 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 994 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
TaxcodeIN Today | Daily GST Updates | 12 August 2026 Read Now (Before Access Restricted): https://taxcode.in/taxcodein-today-daily-gst-updates-12-august-2026/ India's First Tax Platform that lets you search case laws by Section, Sub-section, Clause, Rule, Notification, and Circular, instantly and accurately. Search & Filter here: https://taxcode.in/gst-case-laws/ Check Demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWVdrF…
High Court-Madras [05-Aug-26]: Whether documents and files seized during a GST inspection can be retained after the authorization under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act is withdrawn? Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Sections 67(2), 67(3) and 67(11) – issue concerned the department’s right to retain files and documents taken during an inspection conducted on 25.01.2024 after the authorization letter dated 24.0…
High Court-Tripura [27-Jul-26]: Whether a registered person can be permitted to rectify GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B where invoices were mistakenly filed under GST TDS GSTIN instead of the regular GSTIN and there is no loss of revenue? Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Sections 16(4), 16(5), 37, 38, 39(9), 39(10) – Issue was whether GST returns could be rectified where the petitioner had filed invoices for the releva…
High Court-Karnataka [17-Jul-26]: Whether recovery notices in Form GST DRC-13 and adjudication orders under Section 73 of the CGST/KGST Act can be sustained against a private limited company distinct from the deceased proprietor’s concern and without examining Section 93 liability of the alleged legal heirs? Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Sections 73 and 93(1)(a), 93(1)(b); Karnataka Goods and Services Ta…
High Court-Karnataka [10-Jul-26]: Whether an ex parte GST adjudication and a time-barred appellate rejection should be quashed to permit the assessee to explain a mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 with supporting documents and Board Circulars? Board Circulars dated 27.12.2022 and 17.07.2023 – Challenge to GST adjudication for 2018-19 based on discrepancy in declaration of export turnover between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1…
High Court-Madras [31-Jul-26]: Whether two assessment orders for the same assessment period and the same GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 mismatch could both survive, and whether remand could be granted subject to payment of 100% of the tax demand? Assessment for 2018–2019 – challenge to two orders on grounds of duplication and breach of natural justice – both orders found, on comparison, to relate to mismatch between GSTR 3B and…
High Court-Madras [04-Aug-26]: Whether cancellation of GST registration and rejection of revocation could be sustained when the impugned orders referred only to the intelligence wing report despite record evidence of business being carried on at the registered place of business? Goods and Services Tax – GST registration cancellation; revocation of cancellation – challenge to order cancelling GST registration on the …
GST Case Law Weekly (3–8 August 2026): Decoding Key GST Rulings This weekly digest covers significant GST judgments reported from 3 to 8 August 2026 on ITC, appellate pre-deposit, limitation, Section 74 proceedings, transitional credit, anti-profiteering and procedural safeguards. Read Now (Before Access Restricted): https://taxcode.in/gst-case-law-weekly-3-8-august-2026-decoding-key-gst-rulings/ India's First Tax…
TaxcodeIN Today | Daily GST Updates | 10 August 2026 Read Now (Before Access Restricted): https://taxcode.in/taxcodein-today-daily-gst-updates-10-august-2026/ India's First Tax Platform that lets you search case laws by Section, Sub-section, Clause, Rule, Notification, and Circular, instantly and accurately. Search & Filter here: https://taxcode.in/gst-case-laws/ Check Demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWVdrF…
[Recent Judgment] Supreme Court [06-Aug-26]: Whether omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017 by Notification No. 20/2024 without a saving clause applies to pending refund proceedings? Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 – Rule 96(10); Notification No. 20/2024. Issue was whether omission of Rule 96(10) with effect from 08.10.2024, without any saving clause, would benefit assessees in pending proceeding…
TaxcodeIN Today | Daily GST Updates | 07 August 2026 Read More: https://cd.taxcode.in/GST-Journals/Daily/2026/daily-gst-updates-2026-08-07-1vg0y.pdf Join WhatsApp Group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/GnQenMmM95pHOQS4ba0EvH TaxcodeIN Decoding Indian Tax Laws Visit for DeepSummary, SearchAI+, EXTRA filters and more: www.taxcode.in
GSTAT July 2026 Round-Up: 13 Key Rulings on ITC, Pre-Deposit, GST Exemption and Anti-Profiteering Read Now (Before Access Restricted): https://taxcode.in/gstat-july-2026-round-up-13-key-rulings-on-itc-pre-deposit-gst-exemption-and-anti-profiteering/ India's First Tax Platform that lets you search case laws by Section, Sub-section, Clause, Rule, Notification, and Circular, instantly and accurately. Search & Filter …
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @taxcodein. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 385,063 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TaxcodeIN” (@taxcodein), 7 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taxcodein.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.