Channel
@taufertshoefer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13,985subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001214939488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taufertshoefer |
| Description | Rainer Taufertshöfer Heilpraktiker · freier Medizinjournalist · Forscher · Entwickler · Fachbuchautor Impressum & Anbieterkennzeichnung: www.forschungsseminare.de/impressum Datenschutz: www.forschungsseminare.de/datenschutz |
| Created | 31 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taufertshoefer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 13,985 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 13,986 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 13,989 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 13,990 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 13,993 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 13,998 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 14,003 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 14,006 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 14,007 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 14,007 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (27 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 53,536 |
| Reactions total | 795 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
795 reactions across 39 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 313 | 39.4% | |
| ❤ | 286 | 36.0% | |
| 💯 | 114 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 61 | 7.67% | |
| 🤝 | 21 | 2.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 795reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝗞𝗮𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘄𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝘂𝗳 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘁𝘇 𝗲𝗶𝗻𝘀 Wie man einem ganzen Land Silben verkauft und es dafür auch noch bezahlen lässt Hören Sie sich die ersten Sekunden an. Ihr Kopf wird Englisch hören. Ihr Kopf irrt sich. Vollständige Aufnahme: (https://youtu.be/fU-wH8SrFro) Im November 1972 veröffentlichte Adriano Celentano eine Single, deren Text aus vollständig erfundenen Silben besteht, gebaut als klangliche Attrappe des amerikanisch…
❤6👍5
ES REICHT – TEIL 3/3 Was sich jetzt ändern muss Ich will von deutscher Politik nicht länger hören, wie Deutschland „kriegstüchtiger“ werden soll. Ich möchte wissen, wie Deutschland friedenstüchtiger werden will. Wo ist die große deutsche Friedensinitiative? Wo sind die Gesprächskanäle nach Moskau? Wo sind die Vermittler? Wo sind die kompromisslosen diplomatischen Bemühungen für die Menschen in Gaza, im Libanon und…
❤18👍14👏8💯4🤝1
ES REICHT – TEIL 2/3 Die vergessenen Opfer des Krieges Menschen kommen körperlich lebend aus Kriegen zurück und sterben Jahre später an dem, was diese Kriege in ihnen hinterlassen haben. Die amerikanischen Zahlen sind ein erschütterndes Mahnmal: Für die gesamte Generation der Vietnam-Ära-Veteranen wurden zwischen 1979 und 2019 94.497 Suizide registriert. Für die Generation der amerikanischen Kriege nach dem 11. Se…
❤15💯9👏3👍1
ES REICHT – EIN MANIFEST GEGEN DIE POLITIK DES KRIEGES TEIL 1/3 Es reicht nicht mehr, über einzelne Kriege zu sprechen. Es reicht nicht mehr, den nächsten Waffenstillstand abzuwarten, während längst die nächste Eskalation vorbereitet wird. Und es reicht erst recht nicht mehr, betroffen auf neue Opferzahlen zu schauen und anschließend genauso weiterzumachen wie zuvor. Diese Politik muss sich grundlegend ändern. Ei…
❤23👍7👏7🤝4
🆕 Viele beschäftigen sich seit Jahren mit Chlordioxid. Und genau das ist manchmal das Problem. Denn wer sich jahrelang in denselben Gruppen, denselben Kanälen, denselben Büchern und denselben Erzählungen bewegt, merkt oft nicht mehr, dass er sich nicht weiterentwickelt. Er bewegt sich im Kreis. Immer dieselben Protokolle. Immer dieselben Namen. Immer dieselben Versprechen. Immer dieselben Abwehrreflexe, sobald jem…
❤6👍5👏1💯1🤝1
https://youtu.be/9F3BuSC3c9k?si=XVEnXZFJuB1D0eDz
👍8
𝐄𝐬 𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐜𝐡𝐭𝐞 𝐤𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐏𝐚𝐧𝐳𝐞𝐫 Teil 3 von 3 Daran lässt sich ablesen, wie viel billiger Herrschaft geworden ist. Ein System, das auf Panzer angewiesen ist, arbeitet mit einem teuren Instrument, weil Panzer Bilder erzeugen und Bilder Märtyrer, während ein System, das über Deutungshoheit verfügt, über den Zugang zum Beruf, zum Konto, zum Geschäft und zum Ansehen in der eigenen Straße, dieselbe Fügsamkeit zum Nulltarif beko…
👍23❤5
𝐙𝐰𝐞𝐢 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞, 𝐞𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐛𝐧𝐢𝐬 Teil 2 von 3 Der Einwand lautet, dass man gegen ein System von innen heraus nicht ankomme und dass es deshalb zuerst fallen müsse, und regelmäßig werden dafür zwei Beispiele aufgerufen, die bei genauerem Hinsehen das Gegenteil belegen. Der Nationalsozialismus ist nicht zusammengebrochen, sondern militärisch beseitigt worden, nach totaler Niederlage, gefolgt von der Besatzung durch vier M…
❤15👍7💯2
𝐄𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐫𝐝 𝐤𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐠𝐮𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐞𝐛𝐞𝐧 Teil 1 von 3 Es wird keine Strafverfolgung geben, und der Grund dafür ist nicht, dass die Beweise fehlten. Die Beweise liegen offen, sie stammen aus den Datenbanken der Behörden selbst, und sie sind seit Jahren einsehbar. Der Grund ist ein Beschluss des Bundestages vom 10. Juli 2025, mit dem festgelegt wurde, in welcher Form aufgearbeitet werden darf, und diese Form ist so gewähl…
👍6
https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/coronalage-maerz-2020
👍6
𝗗𝗮𝘀 𝗘𝗻𝘇𝘆𝗺, 𝗱𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝘂𝗳 𝗱𝗲𝗺 𝗘𝘁𝗶𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗵𝘁 𝗧𝗲𝗶𝗹 𝟮 𝘃𝗼𝗻 𝟮 Bleibt die Gesundheitsfrage, und hier möchte ich sauber trennen. Die Datenlage: Das gereinigte Enzym ist molekular identisch mit dem Kälber-Chymosin, im gereiften Käse ist es weitgehend abgebaut, und Belege für gesundheitliche Unterschiede liegen nicht vor. Wer eine Giftgeschichte daraus macht, behauptet mehr, als sich zeigen lässt. Aber der Umkehrschluss tr…
👍10❤2👏2💯1🤝1
𝗗𝗮𝘀 𝗘𝗻𝘇𝘆𝗺, 𝗱𝗮𝘀 𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝘂𝗳 𝗱𝗲𝗺 𝗘𝘁𝗶𝗸𝗲𝘁𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗵𝘁 𝗧𝗲𝗶𝗹 𝟭 𝘃𝗼𝗻 𝟮 Nach meinem Beitrag zur Käse-Demenz-Studie erreichte mich die Zuschrift einer aufmerksamen Leserin. Ihre Frage: Was hat es mit dem mikrobiellen Lab auf sich, das inzwischen auf vielen Zutatenlisten steht? Sie habe gelesen, Pfizer stecke dahinter, und meide solchen Käse seither. Herzlichen Dank für diese Frage. Sie führt mitten in ein Thema, das kaum jemand ke…
👍14👏4❤2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @taufertshoefer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 66,066 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rainer Taufertshöfer (öffentlich)” (@taufertshoefer), 13,985 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taufertshoefer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.