Channel
@tatsook
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
250subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001325798320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tatsook |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tatsook |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 250 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 249 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 250 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 251 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 251 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
朋友傳來這個圖。感覺希盟越來越弱，馬來西亞走回老路。我想，華人應該算是發了一場夢。該醒了。 當初華人選行動黨是為了平權，馬來西亞人的馬來西亞。並不是為了擋回教化。 希盟崛起，不但放棄了爭取平權還帶來了個副作用-回教強化。 1。安華+家人都是回教撚。 2。行動黨崛起嚇怕了馬來人。一大部份馬來人選擇了回教黨或者說用宗教回教來回應所謂行動黨/華人的崛起。 當初，是巫統和皇權擋住了回教強化不是？ 嘿嘿，希盟崛起反而助長了回教化。平權爭取不到，回教反而強化。 國陣回歸，甚至皇權回歸，代表馬來人權力更加鞏固了。 華人雙輸。恭喜。
Signed ChongST
生平第一次看到戲院開這麼多場次。竟然7點早上就有了。超誇張。 還可以。Marvel 戲只剩下這蜘蛛俠有點期待。老老竇竇，超多裡面的演員我都覺得不吸引。包括Tom Holland 和他戲內戲外的女朋友。肥仔Ned，punisher，也普普通通啊。更不用說那些黑人官職人員，根本路人甲乙丙丁。對了，還有那個演Hulk的演員。好心，你就別再出現了。 還好除了一個厲害角色出現。嘩。單單聽到她的名字我就加分。演員外型也出色。這是一驚喜。 忍者動作戲也加分。
Signed ChongST
這絕對是選民刮了一大巴掌行動黨！好嘢！
Signed ChongST
什麼金部長 奧德賽 鬼謎東宮。。全部靠邊站。最爽最爆就是這部。沒有之一。
Signed ChongST
看來想被封拿督。
Signed ChongST
雙喜 庹宗華的演技絕對秒殺田啟文田雞。偏偏田雞拿了男配角獎？我覺得他還是有點一分鐘幾萬上落那種表演啊。 我一直也很楊貴媚，以前那齣飲食男女真好。原本我想說這齣雙喜她角色設計沒能讓她發揮可是庹宗華 的何嘗不是？可是他就是不說對白的嚴肅表情就贏麻了。可惜網路上找不到一張他嚴肅的劇照。
Signed ChongST
這個好笑。「朝中有人好辦事」這句話，不是以前馬華常講的嗎？
Signed ChongST
這些事也要插一腳？我看Trump也想美國拿世界盃。
Signed ChongST
今晚支持日本！
Signed ChongST
籠統沒數據地說，華人比馬來人更忠於皇室。更讓馬來人想不到地說，行動黨華人政客才是最忠於皇室的政客。 馬來政客？在這次養豬和國家原則事件之中，其實都是大馬來人主義作祟。 以前行動黨唯一敢嗆聲皇室的，死了。就是Karpal Singh。 Tony Pua 劉天球這些二打六，心裡面除了覺得很委屈也很冤枉。他們很快跪下。 普遍，馬來人更叛逆。只是我反可以，你華人卻不可以，如此而已。
Signed ChongST
這也叫承認統考？我不管什麼有突破。想像一下今天還是馬華當政，承認這樣限制的統考，當反對黨的行動黨會怎樣反應？ 倪可敏和小丑肥超會說：當我們人民是傻嗨嗎？
Signed ChongST
• 1979年伊朗革命：反對巴列維國王的聯盟非常廣泛，包括伊斯蘭主義者（以霍梅尼為首）、左派學生/共產黨人（如人民聖戰組織MEK、費達伊游擊隊、圖德黨等）、自由派和民族主義者。大家都討厭沙阿的專制、西化政策和秘密警察（SAVAK）。 • 左派很多人積極支持霍梅尼回國，認為這是反帝國主義、反資本主義的「革命勝利」。圖中兩個歡慶的女性就是典型例子——當時很多世俗/左派女性也上街慶祝，以為新時代來了。 • 革命成功後的清洗：霍梅尼鞏固權力後，迅速翻臉。伊斯蘭政權把左派視為最大威脅： • 1980年代初開始大規模逮捕、酷刑和處決左派。 • 1988年大屠殺最嚴重：霍梅尼下達fatwa（宗教令），處決數千名政治犯，主要針對MEK等左翼團體，也包括其他左派。估計總死亡人數在數千到3萬左右（不同來源有差異，但規模巨大，很多埋在亂葬坑）。 這就是典型的「有用白痴」（useful idiots）現象：左派幫忙推翻舊政權，之後就被新政權當作威脅清除…
Signed ChongST
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tatsook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“達叔” (@tatsook), 250 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tatsook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.