Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 981–1,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 06:58
1,034
+1
6 Sept 2026, 15:37
1,033
+10
2 Sept 2026, 00:53
1,023
+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:38
1,022
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:23
1,019
-1
23 Aug 2026, 21:58
1,020
+2
20 Aug 2026, 16:22
1,018
+10
17 Aug 2026, 15:24
1,008
+6
14 Aug 2026, 18:16
1,002
+13
8 Aug 2026, 00:28
989
+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:32
988
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:18
988
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 28 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
516 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
220
42.6%
👏
92
17.8%
⚡
69
13.4%
custom 5408884759482868280
43
8.33%
custom 5197656850526381168
20
3.88%
😍
15
2.91%
custom 5271567370765222426
12
2.33%
custom 5334738840676475461
11
2.13%
custom 5409268304357369080
11
2.13%
custom 5348522520305740937
9
1.74%
✍
9
1.74%
🗿
4
0.775%
🐳
1
0.194%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 516 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 16 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tati_spit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 February 2025 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Осознанные сновидения. Баг системы или другая реальность — Большое интервью с Тати часть 1
Практик Тати рассказывает, как устроены осознанные и контактные сновидения, почему одного осознания во сне недостаточно и как проводится многоступенчатая верификация необычного опыта.
Обсуждаем внимание, ВТО, совместные сны, спрайтов, учителей, искусственный интеллект и границу между личной фантазией и другой реальностью.
По…
Как-то давно давно искала незрячего человека, чтобы подробно расспросить о снах. Эта встреча состоялась сегодня.
Напомню, что я записывала уже
болталку об опыте со слепым практиком.
😎 Видят ли сны незрячие люди?
Если мы говорим о самом сновидении, то сны снятся всем, потому что это результат активности головного мозга.
Однако, реальность такова, что не все зрячие помнят сны, а незрячие их тоже видят.
Но все же е…
Коллеги, привет 👋
Мы созрели провести практикум «РАСКАДРОВКА СНОВИДЕНИЙ»
‼️группа набрана‼️
Раскадровка - это примерно 1,5 месяца ежедневной практики, где мы объясняем вам механику построения сновидений, а вы ежедневно описываете свои опыты. Вот такой взаимный обмен.
Количество участников:
не более 25 человек.
Участнику не нужно осознаваться, но важно видеть и запоминать сны, поэтому если у вас сейчас с запоминан…
Кстати! Подготовку к Темному ретриту для тех, кто голосовал «в формате влога» буду в сторис выкладывать, вы можете смотреть в профиле канала #темныйретрит (с завтра).
Текстом тоже покажу 🤣🤭 позже.
ИНИОН оберегает очень уязвимое место, это стык между мозжечком и затылочными долями.
Мозжечок участвует в координации движений, сохранении позы и равновесия, отвечает за мышечный тонус (наиболее интересные нам функции как практикам). Также между мозжечком и таламусом есть сигнальные пути, куда сходится информация от органов чувств о том, как происходит регуляция внимания (статья Скотта Марека 2018).
Затылочные дол…
Привет, сообщество! Записала вам пост, который может усилить практику.
🙄🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆
Предыстория: случайным образом внутри группы лет 10 назад мы нашли интересную точку, которая стимулирует гиперреалистичность и плотность внутри сновидений. В тот момент мы исследовали навыки в обычных сновидениях и искали способы удержания себя. Таких точек по телу много, про одну из них сегодня расскажу.
Читали в книгах ХС как они рабо…
Обещала вам делиться практиками своими.
Так вот! Недавно приняла решение, что спланирую себе ТЕМНЫЙ РЕТРИТ (это видео о нём).
Я уже находилась в этой практике, но в этот раз задача будет со звездочкой.
Хотелось бы достичь состояния «нечто/ничто», т.е. поработать с созерцанием таким образом, чтобы выйти из мыслеформ, диалога, картинок, мыслей в голове, букв, звуков, сновидений с визуализацией, информацией и т.д. Хо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tati_spit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Осознанные сновидения 🎙 подкасты” (@tati_spit), 1,034 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tati_spit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
