Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TastyCo

Channel

TastyCo

@tastyco_io

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,360subscribers

+1,269 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984471706
TypeChannel
Username@tastyco_io
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 17 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tastyco_io

Growth

6,0917,3606,725.57 August 2026 — 6,091 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,133 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,794 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,360 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1,269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,901–7,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:347,360+566
10 Aug 2026, 02:536,794+661
7 Aug 2026, 06:526,133+42
7 Aug 2026, 02:016,091first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 7,360 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (17 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total19,465
Reactions total1,884
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,916 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,18461.8%
👍37519.6%
🔥21011.0%
😁361.88%
❤‍🔥231.20%
🤝201.04%
170.887%
👏140.731%
👌110.574%
🐳80.418%
🥰80.418%
👎60.313%
💯30.157%
🍾10.052%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,916reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC295 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The way the world eats is changing fast: 2 trends drove it, and a 3rd is just starting. Trend #1: delivery took over. Food delivery is now a $1.2T market, up more than 150% since 2019 (thanks to COVID-19). Today, people order in as often as they go out, so a brand can reach a whole city without opening a single dining room. Trend #2: AI moved into the kitchen. From processing orders to preparing and delivering fo

9🔥6👍2🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC≈1,360 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Quest campaign issues update: 1. Zealy is currently frozen because we've reached this month's task claim limit. We've already reached out to the Zealy team to increase the limit. 2. Website maintenance is the reason some of you are experiencing wallet connection issues. Please join TastyCo Discord to get all the details and updates.

71🤝20👌11

8 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,350 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

For most businesses, community is a bonus. For food brands, it’s everything: • Customers who keep coming back • Fans who tell their friends • An audience that would support the brand if given the opportunity We believe in the power of community more than anyone. That’s why we’re building our own: to bring together people who believe in TastyCo and want to help spread the idea around the world. Join the heart of o

👍2711🔥9

6 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,880 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Let's talk about $TASTY, the token that powers everything on TastyCo. Top 3 reasons it's at the center of the whole economy: 1. It's how new communities join. Any founder, influencer, or company can launch a real food brand of its own. That starts with a $TASTY deposit, so every new community that joins ecosystem creates demand for the token. 2. It speeds up growth. Founders unlock new locations and features as

94👍38🔥17🐳8😁2

3 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈5,440 views1,136 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Airdrop campaign details are here. We answered the most popular questions from the community: 1. What's the airdrop distribution between platforms? Airdrop will be distributed based on the total pre-TGE points calculation. 70% of all points are allocated to the TastyCo quest platform, and the other 30% are for Galxe, Zealy, and TaskOn. Having profile on the TastyCo website is a must to be eligible. 2. How long

733👍241🔥93😁3413👏9🥰7👎6

31 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,170 views157 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Here’s how a perfect food brand expansion could work with TastyCo. Picture a smash-burger spot in Dubai. Small team, tiny kitchen, and a line down the block every night. The food is killer, but the brand is stuck: no bank will lend without collateral, and founders don’t want to sell a chunk of their company just to open a second location. So they come to TastyCo. They tokenize the brand and raise money directly f

97❤‍🔥23🔥19👍144

30 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,230 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New RWA narrative is here, and its name is FoodFi. Top 3 reasons to pay attention: 1. TastyCo helps food brands launch and scale on-chain. You bring the brand, we bring real kitchens, operators, and delivery. 2. You can buy a brand's token early and earn a share of its revenue as it grows. 3. Food is a $3.5T industry. Even 1% tokenized will match $35B of all RWAs we have on-chain today. FoodFi is here to tokeni

70👍34🔥24👏5🍾1

28 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,640 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$100,000 $TASTY Airdrop Campaign is live! TastyCo is RWA ecosystem for the next generation of food brands - helping launch, grow, and scale brands from idea to market expansion. The earlier you join, the more airdrop points you can earn before TGE. Important: TastyCo quest platform is the main source of airdrop points. Join the campaign here: • Galxe • Zealy • TaskOn • TastyCo quest platform Let’s kick off the F

38🔥14👍11

27 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,090 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Imagine getting in early on a unicorn food brand. Here's what $1,000 invested back then would've turned into today: • Starbucks (1992 IPO) → $350,000 • Chipotle (2006 IPO) → $130,000 • Domino's (2004 IPO) → $56,000 Each one was just another food brand before going mainstream. Back then, only Wall Street got in early. We're flipping that. Now you can back a food brand at the very beginning, the way only insiders u

8🔥8💯3

24 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,010 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

90% of food brand founders fail to get a really good idea to life. Not because the concept is bad, but because founders lack capital and infrastructure to launch and scale. That’s the problem TastyCo solves. You bring the brand: 🌀 name + concept 🌀 unique recipe 🌀 people who already love it We bring: 🌀 real kitchens 🌀 operators 🌀 delivery infrastructure 🌀 way to raise money without selling off a piece of your comp

32🔥9👍8

15 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC605 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The next food giant might start on a screen, not on a street. First comes the idea. Then the audience. Then the community, delivery model, and launch. What used to begin with a location can now begin with demand. Digital-first food brands are not a trend. They are the next growth model. 🍔TastyCo is built for that future.

6🔥5

13 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC376 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

A food brand is ready to scale when it can grow without losing itself. The menu works. The brand is clear. Operators can repeat the model. Demand is already visible. Scaling is not just opening more locations. It is building a system strong enough to carry the brand into new markets. That is what 🍔TastyCo is built for.

4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @tastyco_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 744,637 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TastyCo” (@tastyco_io), 7,360 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tastyco_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.