Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for takisyak

Channel

takisyak

@tasikak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

741subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002198146043
TypeChannel
Username@tasikak
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 November 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tasikak

Growth

740741740.59 November 2026 — 740 subscribers9 November 2026 — 740 subscribers11 November 2026 — 741 subscribers9 November 202611 November 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 740–741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:20741+1
9 Nov 2026, 14:22740no change
9 Nov 2026, 13:47740first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 12 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.8%
avg views ÷ 741 subscribers
Avg views / post
710
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held7 (12 October 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total4,967
Reactions total764
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

764 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥33644.0%
❤24932.6%
🥰9612.6%
🐳455.89%
👾384.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 20:54 UTC293 views93 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

💬 Арт к посту с тви, где человек предполагает, что трубы находящиеся в зоне глубоководного трио, проходят под землей по всему Старр парку (опираясь на анимации, арты и обновленную трофейную дорогу) ⭐ Так что, моё виденье, что они могут перемещаться как ниндзя черепашки через люки #brawl_stars

❤55🥰15❤‍🔥11🐳10👾2

1 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC432 views95 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Хотела парное с Хэнком, но не осилила #brawl_stars

❤‍🔥47❤24🥰15🐳6👾3

24 Oct 2026, 21:48 UTC724 views125 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Хэдканон: Глоуберт и Клэнси до инцидента с кристаллами работали вместе в океанариуме. Оттуда и костюм лобстера, который был что-то типо маскота. Клэнси надевал его, чтобы развлекать детей. 😀😀😀😀 #brawl_stars

❤‍🔥73👾21🐳18❤13

17 Oct 2026, 14:58 UTC902 views133 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

сидим с тобой тута #brawl_stars

❤66❤‍🔥42🥰15👾8🐳2

15 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC684 views89 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Клэнсер шмэнсер и мусоленье его хумки. Когда-нибудь я приду к единому варианту #brawl_stars

❤‍🔥50❤24🥰11🐳4

13 Oct 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,400 views101 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

👍 Последний раз собирала арты к портфолио дню несколько лет назад. В этот раз всё-таки тоже решилась — ради возможности взглянуть на свои более-менее полноценные работы вместе. #portfolioday

❤‍🔥54❤26🥰16👾4🐳1

12 Oct 2026, 13:19 UTC532 views128 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

➰Не знаю, есть ли тут вообще фанаты Мелоди? #brawl_stars

❤‍🔥59❤41🥰24🐳4

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tasikak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“takisyak” (@tasikak), 741 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tasikak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.