I got this message today. Is this normal or a scammer?
π―1

Channel
@tartariabiblicalresearch
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
4,372subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001835616727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tartariabiblicalresearch |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tartariabiblicalresearch |
Religion β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 4,372 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 4,369 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 4,375 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 4,369 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 4,389 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 4,387 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 4,388 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 4,387 | +8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 4,379 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 4,393 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 4,397 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 4,397 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 February 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
604 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 253 | 41.9% | |
| π | 78 | 12.9% | |
| π₯ | 62 | 10.3% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 55 | 9.11% | |
| π― | 51 | 8.44% | |
| π | 35 | 5.79% | |
| π | 20 | 3.31% | |
| π | 20 | 3.31% | |
| π | 12 | 1.99% | |
| β‘ | 7 | 1.16% | |
| π₯° | 4 | 0.662% | |
| π | 2 | 0.331% | |
| π | 2 | 0.331% | |
| π€― | 2 | 0.331% | |
| π«‘ | 1 | 0.166% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I got this message today. Is this normal or a scammer?
π―1
We will not PM you Do not engage with scammers God bless
π11β€2π2
Tβ’Hβ’Iβ’Sβ’Gβ’Eβ’Nβ’Eβ’Rβ’Aβ’Tβ’Iβ’Oβ’N βBut learn a parable from the fig tree: As soon as its branches bow low and its leaves bud forth, you know that summer has arrived... So also, whenever you see all these things, know that he has approached the door. Amen, I say to you that this generation will not pass away until all these things happen.β MATTHEW 24:32-34
β€17π₯7π7β€βπ₯2π1π«‘1
How you view the world after researching Little Season Eschatologyβ¦
π12β€7π5π4π―3β‘2π₯1
β¦ Now letβs bring this little rant back to the OSAS discussionβ¦ If I lived a perfect sinless life from birth to death, and yet still could not receive eternal life, then what would be the one thing I would be missing? Itβs obviously faith in Jesus alone for eternal life, because Scripture still presents eternal life as being found in Jesus alone, and never in our own righteousness. Without faith, none of those greaβ¦
β€10π―4π2π2π1
WHAT IF I LIVED A PERFECT AND SINLESS LIFE? This channel has always preached OSAS, and we affirm that no one can earn salvation by their own righteousness, because we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. But after hearing so many common objections such as: βWell, you canβt just go and sin however you want!β or βWhat if you murder someone?β β¦ I asked myself the question; Well, letβs say what if I hβ¦
β€16π3π2π₯2π1
βRECALCULATING ROUTEβ... I was driving around using Google Maps to get me somewhere, and I ended up missing my turn on accident. But this sparked a memory of a sermon I heard a long time ago about our walk with Jesus and how at times, it can be kind of similar to the very GPS app I was using right then... When you're driving somewhere and you miss the turn, the GPS doesn't suddenly say, "That's it. You're done. Youβ¦
β€21β€βπ₯16π6π4π3
The other day I asked Youtube's Gemini feature to critique Part 2 of the Little Season Time Indicator series, and its conclusion was fascinating to me. Take a look: It said that if you prioritize the plain reading of the Bible's time indicators, verses such as "this generation" (Matthew 24) and "I come quickly" (Revelation), then the logic of the position I presented in the video is internally consistent. It is onlβ¦
β€25π―12π₯6β€βπ₯3π2π1
LITTLE SEASON TIME INDICATORS PART 3 The Great Tribulation Of The First Century π± LINK
β€16π₯6π4π2π1
ACKNOWLEDGE THE LORD IN ALL YOUR WAYS As I have been returning to the Proverbs in my own personal Bible reading, I read a passage which made me think about how overlooked the command in Proverbs is in the lives of many believers, as it had been in mine as well. This is the Proverb: "Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direcβ¦
β€16π6π3π2π₯°2β€βπ₯1
THE WORD OF GOD OR THE WRITTEN WORDS OF GOD? Itβs often said that the Bible is βthe Word of Godβ, or that the King James Bible is the "perfect Word of God", but is that really what Scripture means when it speaks of The Word? John begins his gospel by saying, βIn the beginning The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.". From this, we can understand that "The Wβ¦
β€18π―11π₯7π5β‘2β€βπ₯1
THE FIRST DAY OF CREATION βBefore the firmament, before the sun, moon and the clouds, before man walked the earth, there was Christβ¦β This clip covers Day One of Creation, drawing from ancient texts like the Book of the Bee, revealing how all things were made by Him, and for Him. And it was in the beginning that iniquity was first found, not in man, but in Satan, whose pride sparked the fall long before Eden. The β¦
β€12π6π₯5π4β‘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tartariabiblicalresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππ§π©ππ§ππ & π½πππ‘ππππ‘ πππ¨πππ§ππ πππππΌπΏππΏβ (@tartariabiblicalresearch), 4,372 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tartariabiblicalresearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.