Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ┨⚫😱▶ΤΔʀs O Vαнsнαт◀😱 ⚫(‡▼_▼)

Channel

┨⚫😱▶ΤΔʀs O Vαнsнαт◀😱 ⚫(‡▼_▼)

@tarsovahshat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

973subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001024802839
TypeChannel
Username@tarsovahshat
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tarsovahshat

Growth

9739799765 August 2026 — 978 subscribers6 August 2026 — 978 subscribers13 August 2026 — 979 subscribers22 August 2026 — 973 subscribers5 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 972–980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:26973-6
13 Aug 2026, 23:18979+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:22978no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:13978first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3048.4%
2337.1%
😱58.06%
🔥23.23%
😁11.61%
🤔11.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2023 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 21:03 UTC428 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ادامه : ی مقدار که از خونه دور میشن میبینه جاپای همکارش داره بزرگتر میشه و تعجب میکنه. بدون اینکه چیزی بگه یا نشون بده متوجه شده به راهش ادامه میده تا اینکه جاپای اون شخص خیلی بزرگ میشه و محبوبه خانوم همونجا وایمیسه و تا خونه با سرعت برمیگرده. وقتی برمیگرده کلی تعجب میکنه چون میبینه همون همکارش جلوی در منتظرش وایساده و میره بهش میگه داستان چی بوده و همکارش میگه خوب کاری کردی برگشتی. اون اصلا آدم نبوده و جن داشته تو

3👍1

Signed ع‍ ‍ــــل̲‍ـــی‍ ‍

3 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC427 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

رد پا در برف این داستان ترسناک ایرانی تو یکی از شهرستانهای غرب کشور بوده و تقریبا به سال 1310 مربوط میشه. تو ی روستا یک زنی بوده به اسم محبوبه که الان در قید حیات نیست و اون زمان بعد از فوت شوهرش ازدواج نمیکنه و هر 4تا فرزندش رو خودش بزرگ میکنه. کار محبوبه خانوم هم طوری بوده که صبح زود ساعت 5 از خونه میرفته و با چند زن دیگه کار میکردن اما یک روز محل کار عوض میشه و با محبوبه خانوم شرط میکنن که فردا ساعت 5صبح میایم دنب

👍21

Signed ع‍ ‍ــــل̲‍ـــی‍ ‍

17 Nov 2025, 09:06 UTC≈1,770 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

این داستان ترسناک واقعی که مثل همین داستان طولانی ترین اتاق فرار ترسناک هم ساخته شده از زبون کسی نقل شده که توی کاشان زندگی میکرده و آخر هفته ها میرفته حموم عمومی و چون برنامه اکثر مردم برای آخر هفته همین بوده، حموم خیلی شلوغ میشده و این آقا سعی میکرده تنها و خیلی زودتر از بقیه بره حموم و برگرده تا شلوغ نشده. بقیه ماجرا رو از زبون خودش نقل می کنیم. " اون روز هم مثل بقیه روزا انقدر زود رفته بودم حموم که دلاک حموم هنو

👍52😁1

Signed ع‍ ‍ــــل̲‍ـــی‍ ‍

17 Nov 2025, 09:06 UTC≈1,600 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

داستان ترسناک قدیمی @tarsovahshat

🔥2

Signed ع‍ ‍ــــل̲‍ـــی‍ ‍

12 Feb 2025, 20:43 UTC≈4,730 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

دوستان اگه کسی هست که بخاد ادمین بشه و کمکمون پست بزاره بم پیام بده درضمن اگه کسی داستانی داره حتما برامون بنویسه یا به صورت ویس بفرسته تا بزاریم داخل کانال اگه نظر ،انتقاد و یا پیشنهادی برا بهتر شدن و پیشرفت کانال دارین حتما بگید تا ما استفاده کنیم . به ادمین هم به شدت نیاز داریم ❤️ دمه همتون گرم که همیشه پیشه ما هستین آیدی برا ارسال داستان و نظرات شما رفیقایه گلم 😘❤️👇🏼 @strangers_boy

5👍3

Signed ع‍ ‍ــــل̲‍ـــی‍ ‍

26 Jan 2025, 20:06 UTC≈4,910 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

1

Signed ع‍ ‍ــــل̲‍ـــی‍ ‍

30 May 2023, 16:56 UTC≈7,770 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

•• تصور کنین جای این آدم هستین یا نصفه شب توی اتاقتون همچین اتفاقی با در کمد یا ... بیافته☠ •• میرین سمتش یا میرین تو امنیت گاهه زیر پتو یا چی ‌ M.Z

👍71😱1

Signed ℳ𝒜ℋ𝒟ℐ.𝒵𝒜ℬℐℋℐ

25 Feb 2023, 23:13 UTC≈7,640 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

دو ادعا کردند که این موجود ترسناک می‌خواست وارد خانه شوند. هنری مک‌دانیل، پدر این دو خیلی زود این داستان ترسناک را به تخیل کودکانه‌ی آن‌ها نسبت داد و ماجرا را چندان جدی نگرفت. اما او اواخر همان شب نظرش را عوض کرد. مک‌دانیل بعد از اینکه با صداهای گوش‌خراش عجیبی از خواب بیدار شد، اسلحه و چراغ‌قوه‌ای برداشت تا نگاهی به بیرون منزل بیندازد. او در آنجا میان دو بوته‌ی گل رُز موجودی را دید که به گفته‌ی خودش بدنی «تقریباً شبی

4👍4😱2🤔1

Signed ℳ𝒜ℋ𝒟ℐ.𝒵𝒜ℬℐℋℐ

25 Feb 2023, 23:12 UTC≈6,580 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ℳ𝒜ℋ𝒟ℐ.𝒵𝒜ℬℐℋℐ

25 Feb 2023, 23:12 UTC≈6,410 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

داستان معمای هیولای انفیلد

Signed ℳ𝒜ℋ𝒟ℐ.𝒵𝒜ℬℐℋℐ

25 Feb 2023, 23:09 UTC≈6,470 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

باورهای خرافه‌ی زیادی در مورد اعداد منحوس در دست است. در این میان، به نظر می‌رسد یک شماره تلفن صادر شده از یک شرکت مخابراتی در بلغارستان یکی از مشهورترین موارد مربوط به اعداد نحس در تاریخ معاصر است. ظاهراً این شماره تلفن نحس موجب مرگ دستکم ۳ نفر از صاحبان خود شده است. چه این اتفاقات تصادفی باشد چه نباشد، از آن زمان تا به حال شماره تلفن همراه ۰۸۸۸-۸۸۸-۸۸۸ با مرگ و بداقبالی صاحبانش گره خورده است. اولین قربانی این شماره

4👍1

Signed ℳ𝒜ℋ𝒟ℐ.𝒵𝒜ℬℐℋℐ

25 Feb 2023, 23:03 UTC≈5,380 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🆔 @tarsovahshat☠

Signed ℳ𝒜ℋ𝒟ℐ.𝒵𝒜ℬℐℋℐ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tarsovahshat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 630,745 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“┨⚫😱▶ΤΔʀs O Vαнsнαт◀😱 ⚫(‡▼_▼)” (@tarsovahshat), 973 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarsovahshat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.