Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Медицинские и немедицинские записки

Channel

Медицинские и немедицинские записки

@tarkhils_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,007subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001398548768
TypeChannel
Username@tarkhils_channel
Created7 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tarkhils_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,0055,0255,0156 August 2026 — 5,025 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,022 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,021 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,017 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,018 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,015 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,011 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,006 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,009 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,005 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,008 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,009 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,011 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,007 subscribers5,0076 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,002–5,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:155,007-4
13 Sept 2026, 03:025,011+2
8 Sept 2026, 22:005,009+1
3 Sept 2026, 21:205,008+3
31 Aug 2026, 18:465,005-4
28 Aug 2026, 11:045,009+3
25 Aug 2026, 14:115,006-5
22 Aug 2026, 22:195,011-4
19 Aug 2026, 15:335,015-3
16 Aug 2026, 16:025,018+1
13 Aug 2026, 00:555,017-4
10 Aug 2026, 04:435,021-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:375,022-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:175,025first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,443 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥40628.1%
👍35624.7%
😁18913.1%
❤‍🔥815.61%
724.99%
🫡553.81%
👏422.91%
🤔412.84%
💯402.77%
😢342.36%
🙏281.94%
🥰271.87%
👀211.46%
😱140.97%
👌100.693%
🤩90.624%
😨60.416%
💔40.277%
🤨40.277%
🤓20.139%
1 further kind20.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,503 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC126 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Интересное про рынок труда 1. Аккредитованные IT-компании, которым совершенно не нужны сотрудники, держат на hh вакансии, которые не собираются закрывать 2. Общая тенденция - снижение зарплат, офис, и никаких подработок. Имел ИП c ОКВЭД по IT? Не подходишь. Работник должен 100% своего времени, включая свободное, отдавать работодателю 3. Если не врут, 20 человек на место. Вот такое вот это.

😢8🤝2

11 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC528 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dec_n_genPhoto

Великий британский (новозеландский) хирург Харольд Гиллис был пионером пластической хирургии. Отрасль бурно развивалась во время и после ПМВ. С 1917 по 1925 год он реконструировал лицо более 5 тыс военных. Как считается, насчитывалось примерно 280 тыс британских военных с изувеченными лицами. А тут вот подробности про военную жизнь Гиллиса. #ПМВ #медицина

👏26🔥12👍8

10 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC680 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @v_bunkere_ne_strashnoPhoto

Сегодня очередная годовщина ядерной бомбардировки Хиросимы. Исследований по использованию подземных защитных сооружений в японских городах до сих пор на русском языке не публиковалось. Зато в фондах РГВА в прошлом году нам удалось отыскать рассекреченный документ 1946 года на тему того, как советские специалисты по МПВО впервые анализировали японский опыт. Упоминаются в этом документе и подземные убежища, в которы

👍26🫡9🔥6

9 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC785 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @voenartPhoto

"Старший лейтенант Олфри руководит доставкой боеприпасов, пайков и воды войскам во время газовой атаки" Художник - John Harris Valda ⚔️ VoenArt | Военный арт

👍27👀14🔥7

8 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC898 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вот еще красивый момент

🔥4110

8 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC908 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Августовский отдых

🔥45👍15🫡31

6 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,200 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Лейтенанты медицинской службы Рабоче- крестьянской Красной армии. Место съёмки неизвестно. Июнь - август 1942 г. Фотограф: Д.А. Минскер. Проект Главархива Москвы "Неизвестный герой". Разумеется, это не лейтенанты. Это два военфельдшера

🫡36👍2717😁2

4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,590 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня, согласно Брэдбери, сгорел умный дом. Будет ласковый дождь...

🔥53🤔20👏10😨5💔4❤‍🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,920 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @voenartPhoto

"Раненые солдаты" Художник - Морис-Анри Оранж. 1914 ⚔️ VoenArt | Военный арт

👍32🔥7👌1

27 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,810 views112 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Они что-то знали?

😁69💯40🤔2🤓1

25 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC≈2,240 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Улыбающийся осетинский кот

❤‍🔥54🥰27👍14👏32👌1

24 Jul 2026, 20:22 UTC≈1,770 views77 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Первое фото Луны на новый аппарат. ОЧЕНЬ сложно навестись на резкость ((

🔥5712🤔3🤩3👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @tarkhils_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Первый исторический
@historical_first · 32,374
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Алексей Исаев. «Железный ветер»
@iron_wind · 33,211
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
ЦИФРОВАЯ ИСТОРИЯ – Егор Яковлев
@egoryakovleff · 61,708
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Лекторий Dостоевский
@dostoevsky_fm_dostoverno · 79,517
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Блондинка с укаZкой
@proistoriyZ · 24,676
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Новости истории и археологии
@arch_history_news · 24,779
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Медицинские и немедицинские записки” (@tarkhils_channel), 5,007 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarkhils_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.