приходим за раскладиком на бывшего/ей😂
custom 54114332814071976845custom 54497178339047062282custom 51972357977025049151

Channel
@tarivip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
189subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003074826565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarivip |
| Description | для заказа @tarivipa прайс https://t.me/tarivip/58 тгк по услугам https://t.me/tarivipaa |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarivip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 189 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 189 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,489 |
| Reactions total | 140 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
140 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449717833904706228 | 30 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5197235797702504915 | 27 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5408910963078362945 | 17 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5199450347264821689 | 16 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5323335573656583740 | 12 | 8.57% | |
| custom 5411433281407197684 | 12 | 8.57% | |
| custom 5193104245322179294 | 7 | 5.00% | |
| custom 5195068462715659512 | 6 | 4.29% | |
| custom 5195118683768247577 | 5 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5249414736906301531 | 5 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5298548969499041855 | 2 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5285304024797561704 | 1 | 0.714% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
приходим за раскладиком на бывшего/ей😂
custom 54114332814071976845custom 54497178339047062282custom 51972357977025049151
Ровно через год ,я отвечу себе что изменилось и в чем я выросла как практик
custom 51994503472648216893custom 54114332814071976843custom 54497178339047062282
Знаете… чем глубже я погружаюсь в практику, тем больше становятся мои запросы. Наверное, каждый практик однажды задаёт себе вопрос: чего ты действительно хочешь добиться своими ритуалами и своими способностями? Понятно, что помогать людям, решать их проблемы, быть полезным — это важная часть пути. Но для меня есть ещё одна цель. Я хочу однажды выйти на такой уровень, где смогу получать информацию от мёртвых или ин…
custom 54497178339047062284custom 52985489694990418552custom 54114332814071976842custom 51950684627156595121custom 51994503472648216891
🌟 ЧТО Я РЕКОМЕНДУЮ ДЕЛАТЬ КАЖДОМУ 🧿 • Чистка хотя бы 1 раз в 3 месяца Практикам,и тем ,кто активно взаимодействуют с людьми и их проблемами /сплетнями ,1 раз в 2 месяца * запускать бытовой негатив нельзя ,он начинает сильно отражаться на вашей жизни ,состоянии,возможностях . • Поставить на себя действительно хорошую защиту и переодически проверять /обновлять ее . - это лучший вариант если вы постоянно бегаете на чи…
custom 54497178339047062283custom 54114332814071976842custom 51950684627156595121
почему у всех старых бабок какой-то фетишь что на человеке есть порча.. это угар 😂
custom 51950684627156595124custom 51972357977025049152custom 51994503472648216892
рассказать за комбо чистка + защита ?
custom 51994503472648216894custom 51972357977025049152custom 52853040247975617041
фасую травы😈
custom 54089109630783629455custom 51972357977025049152custom 51994503472648216892
🗡🗡
custom 52494147369063015313custom 53233355736565837403custom 54497178339047062281
сегодня делала чистку девочке ,её вырвало ,базовый минимум или роскошный максимум? 🫣
custom 51994503472648216893custom 54497178339047062283custom 53233355736565837401
🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🌟 Ясновидение 🌟- как раскрыть ? - наших мыслей быть совершенно не должно ,так же когда и призываем силу - отключаем свой внутренний диалог (никаких мыслей ) - берем циферблат (часы которые со стрелками и смотрим как они тикают с полной фокусировкой на них ) - питаемся ни о чем не думать ,с каждым разом будет всё лучше получаться 🌟- совет - по началу заведите тетрадь и записывайте туда все свои мысли ,чт…
custom 51931042453221792943custom 54497178339047062283custom 51972357977025049151custom 54089109630783629451
29 числа свечи у меня 😈
custom 51972357977025049153custom 54089109630783629453custom 51951186837682475771
Перед любым ритуалом обязательно проводится диагностика — 499 грн. На диагностике мы смотрим, что именно вы хотите сделать, как может лечь ритуальное воздействие, какие могут быть последствия и подходит ли вообще этот ритуал именно вам. После диагностики вы можете спокойно копить на ритуал 1–2 месяца если, конечно, он действительно необходим. Необязательно оплачивать всё сразу. Конечно, отлично, если есть возможно…
custom 51951186837682475773custom 54089109630783629453custom 54497178339047062281
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tarivip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 227,077 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“тайные записи ведьмы” (@tarivip), 189 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarivip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.