Channel
@tarikatrd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,329subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001966849013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarikatrd |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarikatrd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 1,329 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 1,330 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 1,330 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 April 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 995 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
310 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 232 | 74.8% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 5.81% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 2.58% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.61% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.645% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.645% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нафс любит обиду, потому что обида позволяет чувствовать собственную правоту. И пока человек обижен, он почти всегда видит только чужую ошибку. Обида очень легко превращается в скрытое высокомерие.
🔥8❤1
«Три вещи - из сокровищ Рая: сокрытие бедствия, сокрытие болезни и сокрытие милостыни».
👍8💔4🔥2👏1
Ствол на который Пророк ﷺ опирался во время проповед и издавал тоскливый стон прежде чем для него был изготовлен минбар. От него послышался такой гул (стон), что мечеть содрогнулась от этого звука, и люди даже подумали, что ствол раскололся и треснул. Тогда Пророк ﷺ спустился с минбара, подошёл к стволу, обнял его и сказал своим сподвижникам: «Разве вы не слышите? Поистине, он заплакал из-за того, что лишился помин…
❤6
Маймун ибн Михран сказал: "Тот, кто согрешил втайне, пускай покается втайне. А тот, кто согрешил открыто, пускай принесет покаяние открыто, ибо люди позорят и не прощают, а Аллах прощает и не позорит". Люди могут годами вспоминать чужие ошибки, осуждать и унижать. Аллах же, если человек искренне покаялся, принимает его покаяние, прощает грех и покрывает его, не раскрывая его позора перед другими людьми. Тот, кто …
🔥3❤2
«они продолжали настойчиво взывать словами: «Господь наш…» и Господь их ответил им.»
❤4💔2🔥1
«Некоторые люди проводят дни, собирая ошибки других, будто им поручено считать чужие проступки. Но забывают, что самый первый человек, которого они должны исправить — это они сами». «Если человек увидит, что его сердце занято недостатками других, пусть знает: это наказание за то, что он оставил свои недостатки». Малик ибн Динар (رحمه الله)
❤6👍2💔2🔥1
«Начало испытания Юсуфа عليه السلام было из-за сна, который он увидел и рассказал, раскрыв его. И причиной его спасения также стал сон, который увидел царь и раскрыл его. Это для того, чтобы показать: Аллах совершает то, что пожелает. Как Аллах сделал причиной его испытания раскрытие одного сна, так же Он сделал причиной его спасения раскрытие другого сна. Поэтому пусть все знают: дело находится в могуществе Аллаха …
🔥7👍2🤝1
Табиин, аскет, покинувший этот мир более 1300 лет назад — Муслим ибн Ясар (да помилует его Аллах) — говорил: مَا غَبَطْتُ رَجُلًا بِشَيْءٍ مَا غَبَطْتُهُ بِثَلَاثٍ: زَوْجَةٍ صَالِحَةٍ، وَبِجَارٍ صَالِحٍ، وَبِمَسْكَنٍ وَاسِعٍ «Не завидовал я белой завистью ни одному человеку ни в чём так, как завидую обладателю трёх вещей: праведной супруге, благочестивому соседу и просторному дому». Ибн Аль-Джаузи, «Ан-Ниса», 513 …
❤15👍3
Когда хочешь блага для себя — начинай приносить его другим. Если хочешь, чтобы за тебя искренне молились — чаще делай дуа за людей сам. Если тебе нужна поддержка — стань поддержкой для кого-то. Знай: счастье удивительным образом приходит к тем, кто приносит радость в сердца других. ﴿لَن تَنَالُوا الْبِرَّ حَتّىٰ تُنفِقُوا مِمّا تُحِبّونَ﴾ «Вы не достигнете истинного благочестия, пока не станете расходовать то, ч…
❤10🔥4
"У савана нет карманов"
❤12
«Если бы не толкования учёных и не передача ими слов и наследия прежних поколений в книгах, то исчезло бы и начало знания, и его конец. Поэтому было сказано: “Люди будут пребывать во благе, пока остаются первые, у которых учатся последующие”».
❤10👏2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤22🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tarikatrd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 718,906 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тарикат.РД” (@tarikatrd), 1,329 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarikatrd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.