Channel
@tarich1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
610subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001519274253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarich1 |
| Created | 8 December 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarich1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 610 | -35 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 645 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 682 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 682 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 8 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tarich1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2021 to 9 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️Ads2Buy начал снижать комиссии. Теперь купить рекламу и моментально увидеть её в любом канале стало еще дешевле! Развить свой Telegram канал или начать пассивно зарабатывать ты можешь вместе с A2B.
Ads2Buy - Биржа рекламы с МОМЕНТАЛЬНОЙ публикацией постов! Если у тебя есть свой Telegram канал - мы найдем тебе клиентов для рекламы. Если ты ищешь рекламу - мы найдем тебе тысячи каналов, где ты можешь купить необходимый пост. Никаких переговоров. Честные цены. Реклама публикуется сама. Вы не зависите ни от кого. Ads2Buy - сайт для пассивного дохода или удобной покупки рекламы. Регистрация за 1 минуту*
⋆˚࿔ 𝐓𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐑𝐀𝐌 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐋𝐒 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ ✍️Current stock: 16.02 | 16th Feb 𝘎𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘵 - https://t.me/tarichgroups26 𝘎𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘵 - https://t.me/chat_birzha1 𝘛𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘦𝘴 - https://t.me/technowadays1 𝘐𝘛 - https://t.me/pragramm_coding1 𝘍𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 - https://t.me/finance_tarich 𝘎𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘴 / 𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘴 - https://t.me/tovarka_tarich 𝘉𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 - https://t.me/BUSINESS_MAJORS 𝘍𝘰𝘰𝘥 (𝘊𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨) - https://t.me/cookingtarich 𝘈𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘦 - https://t.me/watahima_h…
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @tarich1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 380,339 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tarich1 named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tarichso2” (@tarich1), 610 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarich1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.