Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Иван Царев | Пора дороже

Channel

Иван Царев | Пора дороже

@targetolog_pro_prodaji

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

27subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002490899955
TypeChannel
Username@targetolog_pro_prodaji
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/targetolog_pro_prodaji

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

272827.57 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers8 October 2026 — 27 subscribers7 August 20268 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 62 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 20:2027-1
11 Aug 2026, 06:1628no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:2228first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3041.1%
🔥1317.8%
👍1115.1%
🤣68.22%
😱45.48%
👏34.11%
😁22.74%
🦄22.74%
🌭11.37%
💩11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 18 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Nov 2025, 12:45 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Жиза. Был созвон с лидом на прошлой неделе — договорились, что мне нужно время до вторника, чтобы подготовить стратегию. Как думаете, когда я её готовлю? Правильно. Прямо сейчас.

❤2💩1🤣1

24 Oct 2025, 08:23 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Плохой из меня хозяин, забыл про ~300 муравьев. В общем нас не сосчитать, ну или ~309

🤣5

24 Oct 2025, 07:52 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вчера завели еще одного члена семьи) Теперь нас 7 😐 Собаку назвали Рада❤️

❤3

6 Oct 2025, 09:01 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А сегодня лид меня называл Русланом. Карма?

😁2

2 Oct 2025, 10:44 UTC138 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Факап произошел сегодня. У лида вместо имени написан номер телефона, в процессе диалога в телеге все время называл его Анатолий (вообще не знаю почему), но раньше он не реагировал. Сегодня написал ему, чтобы напомнить о себе...

😱3

1 Oct 2025, 15:13 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Долго думал, какое название для канала придумать: был выбор между "Без алиби" и "Пора дороже". В итоге выбрал второй вариант, хз, может и его скоро поменяю. Кстати, у меня завтра день рождения! 🥳 Это повод поставить перед собой новые цели, а потом посмотреть, чего я достиг за год. Я уже так делал как-то раз, но чаще всего сбивался с пути. Возможно, этот пост поможет мне идти вперёд. Я выхожу из алиби. Я больше не …

🔥5❤3

27 Aug 2025, 08:24 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Хочу сегодня подробнее разобрать один момент: как без кейсов можно закрыть клиента. Представь ситуацию: ты откликаешься на вакансию или делаешь холодную рассылку и тебе повезло, что тебе ответили. Потом потенциальный клиент спрашивает про кейсы Что обычно делают, когда нет кейсов? Говорят прямо, кейсов нет. Не оформлял. Либо врут и придумывают кейсы. Либо копируют чужие. В итоге теряются в диалоге или вовсе его сл…

❤3👍1

11 Aug 2025, 12:04 UTC160 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Опять начал бегать. После почти трёх месяцев перерыва — ощущение, что никогда в жизни этого не делал. Начал с 3 км. Ну как “с 3 км”: 1 пробежал, 1 прошёл, 1 снова пробежал. Хочу вернуть стабильность — чтобы выходить на пробежку без вот этих “ну завтра”, “ну некогда”. И хочу дойти до того, чтобы спокойно бежать 5 км в среднем темпе 5–7 минут, и при этом не выплёвывать лёгкие на финише. Понимаю, что пока этого нет. …

👍3

1 Aug 2025, 08:46 UTC176 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Миф: Большой чек - это больше ответственности и больше работы Реальность: Больше чек - больше чек 😁

❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @targetolog_pro_prodaji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2025, 12:37 UTCFinal Results4 voters

так, ладно Я вот думаю, че бы написать интересненького, может выберем вместе?👇

  1. Как продавать без кейсов — и не врать25%
  2. Как заработать на фрилансе, жесткая правда50%
  3. Что будет внутри гайда про продажу на 50к+0%
  4. Ответы на вопросы про ваши продажи - вопрос в комменты0%
  5. Отстань и думай сам25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 18 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Иван Царев | Пора дороже” (@targetolog_pro_prodaji), 27 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/targetolog_pro_prodaji.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.