Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tarek Ali · Smart Forex Signals 💹

Channel

Tarek Ali · Smart Forex Signals 💹

@tarekaliforex

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,231subscribers

-660 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001914178518
TypeChannel
Username@tarekaliforex
Description📊 توصيات وتحليلات فوركس احترافية 💡 تداول بذكاء مع خبرة +10 سنوات 🎯 تعليم، دعم مباشر، وصفقات موثوقة ✉️ ابعت كلمة “تداول” وابدا طريقك صح @Tarek_Ali_Trader
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tarekaliforex

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,2319,8919,5617 August 2026 — 9,891 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,891 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,880 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,862 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,829 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,824 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,800 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,788 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,746 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,722 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,700 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,675 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,627 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,607 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,567 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,495 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,444 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,397 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,379 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,363 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,347 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,322 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,305 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,284 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,269 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,259 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,231 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 91 days, net -660. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,132–9,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:199,231-28
3 Nov 2026, 14:599,259-10
31 Oct 2026, 17:159,269-15
28 Oct 2026, 23:519,284-21
26 Oct 2026, 04:109,305-17
23 Oct 2026, 09:169,322-25
20 Oct 2026, 14:389,347-16
17 Oct 2026, 08:369,363-16
14 Oct 2026, 19:069,379-18
11 Oct 2026, 19:399,397-47
5 Oct 2026, 02:419,444-51
26 Sept 2026, 02:219,495-72
17 Sept 2026, 07:389,567-40
13 Sept 2026, 17:209,607-20
9 Sept 2026, 16:419,627-48
4 Sept 2026, 13:229,675-25
1 Sept 2026, 03:569,700-22
29 Aug 2026, 11:339,722-24
26 Aug 2026, 21:099,746-42
23 Aug 2026, 23:399,788first reading

Engagement

195 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.31%
avg views ÷ 9,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 195 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held195 (5 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total6,296
Reactions total518
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,260
Videos
≈110
Links
≈1,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,861 reactions across 195 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤55029.6%
🔥54229.1%
👏19310.4%
❤‍🔥1608.60%
🙏1357.25%
👌1206.45%
🤩1166.23%
😍160.86%
🎉130.699%
🏆60.322%
🥰40.215%
👍20.107%
😘20.107%
🫡20.107%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 195 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,861 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (3.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 01:10 UTC71 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

اصطباحه قوية جدا على الدهب من جروب ال vip🔥💸🤑💪💵

🔥4❤2🤩2

8 Nov 2026, 19:54 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

السبت والحد على جروب ال vip 🔥💸🤑💪 ربح بس ولا صفقه خساره 💰🤷‍♂🎊💸🔥🤑🎉

❤‍🔥4❤2🔥1🤩1

8 Nov 2026, 19:53 UTC85 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🔴 أهم أحداث الأسبوع القادم 🟢 الاثنين 9 نوفمبر 🟢 تصريحات عدد من مسؤولي الفيدرالي. 🔵 الثلاثاء 10 نوفمبر 🔘 مؤشر أسعار المستهلكين CPI. 🔘 التضخم الأساسي Core CPI. 🔘 تصريحات كريستوفر والر، عضو الفيدرالي. أهمية اليوم: بيانات التضخم هي الحدث الأبرز هذا الأسبوع، وقد تؤثر بقوة على توقعات الفائدة وحركة الذهب والدولار. 🟡 الأربعاء 11 نوفمبر 🟡 عطلة يوم المحاربين القدامى في الولايات المتحدة. 🟣 الخميس 12 نوفمبر 🟣 طلبات إعانة …

🔥4🙏2👌1👏1

8 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC78 views9 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🔴 لماذا نفس المنطقة تنجح مرة… وتفشل في المرة التالية؟ شفت منطقة ارتد منها السعر بقوة أكثر من مرة في المرة الأولى دخلت شراء ونجحت. في المرة الثانية رأيت السعر يعود إليها، فقلت: "هنا سيرتد مرة أخرى." لكن هذه المرة… كسرها السعر بسهولة. لماذا؟ لأن قوة المنطقة ليست ثابتة. كلما عاد السعر إلى نفس المنطقة واختبرها، قد يستهلك جزءًا من الأوامر الموجودة فيها. يعني المنطقة التي كانت قوية في الاختبار الأول، ليست بالضرورة بنف…

❤4👌2🙏2👏1

8 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC98 views9 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🔴 متى تكون الصفقة الجيدة… صفقة لا تستحق الدخول؟ قد يكون تحليلك ممتازًا… الاتجاه واضح، المنطقة قوية، ونقطة الدخول منطقية. لكن هناك سؤال أهم: هل العائد المتوقع يستحق المخاطرة؟ تخيل صفقة قد تخسر فيها 100 دولار إذا أخطأت، بينما أقرب هدف منطقي أمامك لا يعطيك إلا 50 أو 60 دولارًا. هنا قد يكون التحليل صحيحًا تمامًا… لكن الصفقة نفسها لا تستحق الدخول. لأنك لا تُقيّم الصفقة فقط على أساس: ❌ "هل السعر يمكن أن يتحرك في الا…

👌4❤2👏2🙏1

7 Nov 2026, 21:59 UTC113 views10 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🔴 متى تحرك وقف الخسارة؟ الصفقة تحركت في صالحك أول فكرة تأتي في بالك: "هحرك وقف الخسارة لنقطة الدخول وأضمن الصفقة." تبدو فكرة ممتازة… لكن ماذا لو عاد السعر لحظيًا بشكل طبيعي، وضرب وقفك، ثم أكمل في الاتجاه الذي كنت تتوقعه؟ هنا لم يكن تحريك الوقف حماية للصفقة بل كان سبب خروجك منها. لذلك لا تحرك وقف الخسارة لمجرد أن الصفقة أصبحت رابحة. ⭐️ اسأل أولًا: ➖ هل السعر تحرك فعلًا بالشكل الذي يؤكد استمرار الفكرة؟ ➖ هل تكو…

🙏5❤2👏2👌1

7 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC122 views11 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

اخر صفقات قفلت دلوقتي حالا على جروب ال vip 🔥💸🤑💪💵مستنى ايه عشان تبدأ معانا وتحقق ارباح بالدولار 💵🤑🤑💸💸

🤩6❤3❤‍🔥2

7 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC129 views11 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

من ارباح التيم الجامد اوى بتعنا الايام اللى فاتت على جروب ال vip 🔥💸🤑💪💵

❤‍🔥6🔥2🤩2❤1

7 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC109 views12 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤7🔥2🤩2😘1

6 Nov 2026, 23:57 UTC112 views11 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

اخر صفقات قفلت دلوقتي على جروب ال vip 💵🤑💪🔥 مستنى ايه عشان تبدأ معانا وتحقق ارباح بالدولار 💵💸🤑🔥

🔥6❤2❤‍🔥2🤩1

6 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC107 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🔴 لماذا كان الكسر صحيحًا… لكن الصفقة فشلت؟ تخيل أن السعر أمام مقاومة قوية، وبعد فترة كسرها وأغلق فوقها. دخلت شراء مباشرة لأنك اعتبرت الكسر تأكيدًا للصعود. لكن السعر رجع أسفل المقاومة وضرب وقف خسارتك. 🔴 هل كان الكسر كاذبًا؟ ليس بالضرورة. أحيانًا يكون الكسر صحيحًا فعلًا، لكن المشكلة أنك دخلت بعد أن أخذ السعر معظم حركته، أو دخلت أمام منطقة قوية يمكن أن توقفه. بمعنى أبسط: الكسر قد يكون صحيحًا… لكن مكان دخولك خاطئ…

🔥6❤3👏2👌1

6 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC109 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🟥 #صدر: 📊 أمريكا - 🇺🇸 ⬅️ مؤشر ميشيغان لثقة المستهلك ▪️ السابق : 48.0 ▪️ التقدير : 48.1 ▫️ الحالي : 51.0 ✅ النتيجة : إيجابي للدولار الأمريكي 💵 .. سلبي للذهب 📊

🙏6👏3❤2👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @tarekaliforex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

تفتكر سعر الدهب هيروح فين بعد قرارات ال nfp النهاردة

  1. صاعد 440065%
  2. هابط 423038%
  3. هيفضل فى حركه عرضية3%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tarek Ali · Smart Option Signals ⚡
@tarekalioptions · 33,386
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Online Society of Nutrition
@OSNgroup · 19,446
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 October 2026
كورساتك بالعربي
@YourcoursesArabic · 25,314
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
Mai khaled trader in Forex
@maikhaledtraderforex · 35,038
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Money Master
@MoneyMaster111 · 28,493
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Mai khaled trader
@maikhaledtrader222 · 48,318
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tarek Ali · Smart Forex Signals 💹” (@tarekaliforex), 9,231 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarekaliforex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.