Привет!
Я Агриппина - маркетолог Калининградского зоопарка
Это мой блог о работе
Подписывайся, если хочешь узнать в внутрянки работы в зоопарке, как сотрудника, который работает не с дикими животными, а с ещё более опасными - людьми ❤️🩹
Created
12 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 20:31
38
no change
9 Aug 2026, 12:31
38
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
269.6%
avg views ÷ 38 subscribers
Avg views / post
102
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
16 (12 July 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
1,127
Reactions total
75
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
8
Videos
3
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
110 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
46
41.8%
🔥
15
13.6%
😁
11
10.0%
custom 5253848023624066858
6
5.45%
👍
6
5.45%
custom 5296788775936992462
5
4.55%
custom 5256104178534589054
4
3.64%
😭
4
3.64%
custom 5406602551300729154
3
2.73%
💘
3
2.73%
💯
3
2.73%
⚡
2
1.82%
custom 5256223398236791592
1
0.909%
custom 5273991969998117492
1
0.909%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ЛЯГУШАЧЬЕ ПЕДАЛИРОВАНИЕ
Обожаю этих смешнявок. Обезьянья лягушка 🦍
Сегодня хотела бы сказать, что являясь Фиксиком в этой большой системе, очень тяжело всегда быть активным Фиксиком
Я эту неделю снова работаю все выходные, хоть в вск и 4 часа, но все равно же работаю 😐
Хочется поскорей сделать работу с одной стороны, что взять ее домой и делать 💻
Но потом я вспоминаю слова психолога о том, что надо любить себя …
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ну что пришло время подводить итоги Зеленого фестиваля 🦋
😴Задумка моя была хорошая, но не доведена до конца 😴
Я выросла на немецких фломарках🐱, поэтому я так хотела организовать эту активность. Это было интересным в моих планах 💻
😊Но, увы, большинству не зашел такой формат от слова совсем 😢
Приходилось предпринимать много всего, чтобы хотя бы половину продать😪
Выводы были сделаны и на подкоррчку записаны
Будем работа…
Это базовая информация
Но моя активность 🦋
Полосатая барахолка 🙂
У нас стоял вопрос звать людей, которые знают, как это делать но за money, или же как-то иначе😁
Моя еврейская душонка не хотела платить ни рубля денег из казны за то, что я бы могла организовать с помощью моих коллег
И так родилась полосатая барахолка
Все очень просто:
Сотрудники всего зоопарка приносят вещи, которые классные, но им не нужны
…
2️⃣6️⃣ июля в 1️⃣2️⃣ часов приглашаем на главное ЭКО-событие года — Зелёный фестиваль в Калининградском зоопарке!
✔️ В этом году мы посвятили фестиваль осознанному потреблению и вторичному использованию вещей. Посмотрите на картинку: зачастую несортированный и не отправленный в переработку мусор попадает в природу, принося огромный вред всему живому.
26 июля с 12:00 до 16:00 в зоопарке будет работать 1️⃣5️⃣ площад…
Настроение на сегодня примерно такое же 🐱
Наши макаки - это буст хорошего настроения ❤️
Но нельзя улыбаться им, даже если они очень сильно умиляют
Для макак это проявления недружелюбного отношения (оскал) 🦍
Так что не удивляетесь, если они будут прыгать к стеклу и выражать агрессию 🦔
Сегодняшний пост будет посвящен как всегда трудовым будням
🙂
Сегодня у нас был сильный дождь, а зонтики для слабых
Поступило задание 😨 снять завершение пано в бегемотнике
Об этом написал Калининградский зоопарк в своих соцсетях очень подробно
Но я все не об этом! 😎
Я сегодня была в бегемотнике 😁 и смогла его рассмотреть полностью. Насколько все понимают, бегемот в этот момент гулял 🐶
Что я подметила:
1️⃣ брызги по…
Эти проказницы сегодня мешали совещаться
Орали криком
А потом, такие невинные ❤️🩹
🔥5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tarakan_fm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,132,405 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Будни деревенского маркетолога” (@tarakan_fm), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarakan_fm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
