Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bold private group

Channel

Bold private group

@tapthebold

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

232subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002156829775
TypeChannel
Username@tapthebold
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tapthebold

Growth

2312352337 August 2026 — 235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 234 subscribers16 August 2026 — 231 subscribers24 August 2026 — 232 subscribers2327 August 202624 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 09:13232+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:18231-3
8 Aug 2026, 12:46234-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:02235no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:19235first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 7 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
571.4%
👍114.3%
👎114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Apr 2026, 03:17 UTC≈4,420 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The future is a convenient excuse. People save money, time, their lives. For later. Then later nothing happens. Money isn’t security. It’s a resource that either moves or decays. As long as you save, you’re playing by someone else’s rules. As long as you spend — you live. Bold — for those who don’t leave life for later. @be_BOLD_bot

3

17 Apr 2026, 04:49 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Pablo Escobar was earning so much cash that it became a building material or decaying rat food. A portion of it was lost every year. Not even spent — just turned into nothingness. At one point, he burned around $2 million in cash just to keep his daughter warm. This wasn’t spending. There was no purchase. No exchange. No return. Just money, turning into heat. When you have too much of it, you just burn it. Burn

10 Apr 2026, 02:39 UTC≈2,330 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This isn’t an argument for recklessness. It’s an argument against small thinking. If you can’t imagine how to spend your money, just burn it. Bold is for people who don’t live within their means. @be_BOLD_bot

6 Apr 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Mike Tyson earned hundreds of millions before turning thirty. Bought mansions the size of resorts. Filled garages with Bentleys and Ferraris. Kept pet tigers because a regular pet would’ve been boring. Spent six figures on jewelry like it was grocery shopping. Money is temporary. When you have them, you are a king. When you lose them, you're nothing. Unless you lose them purposefully. Not because you need someth

4 Apr 2026, 02:37 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ironic. The man whose face is on a dollar bill thinks money won't buy you happiness. But you still run after it. Stop. Burn it all. Bold is for those who stopped chasing and started spending. @be_BOLD_bot

26 Mar 2026, 22:30 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Robert Maxwell always lived as if there was no tomorrow: private jets, a 60-meter yacht, reckless corporate takeovers. Spending became a form of life. Some will say that's stupid. We say it's fascinating: to live a life treating money like nothing. Here at Bold, we approve it. @be_BOLD_bot

23 Mar 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,290 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Nicholas Cage made hundreds of millions. Bought several castles, a private island, a dinosaur skull for $276,000. A collection of exotic cars large enough to forget what you own. Did it bring happiness? Not really. When you own so much that you can't keep track of it — you own nothing. You don't need these problems. You need Bold. @be_BOLD_bot

1

13 Mar 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,790 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Take all your money and throw it out of the window. What remains? If the answer makes you uncomfortable, the numbers were doing more work than you were. At Bold, we spend money to show what we're worth.

1👍1

9 Mar 2026, 15:26 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Emperor Nero: a pinnacle of spending He spent tons of gold on meaningless things: feasts, orgies, palaces that served no purpose. But what's left? A reputation of a madman, who burnt Rome to the ground. And all the money in the world didn't help. Money by itself doesn’t create legacy. It only amplifies what’s already there. If there’s no substance, it exposes emptiness. When spending is the only statement, there

7 Mar 2026, 11:42 UTC992 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Nerves, time, energy. Isn't that too high a price to pay? At Bold, we decided to free ourselves from money. Just get rid of it. When will you free yourself?

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @tapthebold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bold private group” (@tapthebold), 232 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tapthebold.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.