7 measurements spanning 12 days, net -173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,353–8,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 12:12
8,379
-33
16 Aug 2026, 17:57
8,412
-53
13 Aug 2026, 03:54
8,465
-49
10 Aug 2026, 04:48
8,514
-36
7 Aug 2026, 15:31
8,550
-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:32
8,552
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:27
8,552
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,170
Videos
≈159
Links
≈2,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
45
64.3%
❤
23
32.9%
🤓
2
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 24 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New era of X applications has started.
X Age frontier of this era. Frontier of new narrative.
Rules are simple, connect your X, calculate the age of your account, complete tasks, invite friends and earn $XAGE token.
The game has began.
🎁 FREE XAGE TOKENS
Binance founder CZ believes $ASTER will overtake $BNB one day.
Register for AsterDex now 👇
https://www.asterdex.com/en/referral/84e74f
✅ Multi chain 🙏
✅ $ASTER airdrops for early users 🤑
✅ Backed by the LEGEND CZ 💪
Just Use Code 84e74f
🐧 What’s Up With the Penguins? Early Access Just Dropped
👀 Pudgy Penguins team just opened early access signups for their new project — and if you’re fast, you might get some juicy beta perks (and possibly more).
Here’s the alpha:
1️⃣ Join Now
2️⃣ Tap Start
3️⃣ Click Join Early Access
💥 That’s it. 15 seconds of effort — potential future rewards incoming. If you’ve been watching the space, you know they’re cooking…
🚀 GOBNB Is Going To Be A Reward And Networking Based Utility Project Run By A Known Trustworthy Team With Previous Projects Hitting Multimillion MC!
❤️ This Will Be A Reflection Token On BSC With 5/5 Tax And All 100% Rewards Will Be Sent To Holders In Form Of USDT.
GOBNB dApp Is Live And Pre Launch Registrations Has Started 👇🏼
🔥 REGISTER NOW
I’ve started collecting rare NFT planes in PlaneTON!
Discover the rarity and design of your very first plane too by opening the link below.
The race for the rarest planes has begun! 🚀✈
🔥 JOIN TODAY
I'm with ONTON to support Genesis ONIONs NFTs. The biggest 2025 NFT launch on TON is here.
Mint your way to the $ONION airdrop, ONTON’s native token launching soon.
How it works:
VISIT the Minting App
Pay 5 TON to spin
Unwrap Gold, Silver, and Bronze Genesis ONION NFTs
Collect sets of Gold, Silver, and Bronze to boost your airdrop multiplier
All holders of Genesis ONIONs will get an airdrop. Don’t sleep before th…
Fight Me: How to Earn $TON
Fight Me is a next-gen game on Telegram — no tokens, no tap mechanics. Just real fights with real rewards. Here’s how you can earn $TON by playing:
🔹 Leaderboards – Compete in seasonal rankings and earn $TON, Cola, Gems, and Shards.
🔹 Tournaments – Different formats, different entry rules, and big prize pools.
🔹 Marketplace – Buy, sell, and trade fighters like a real Fight Club Manager.
…
REP Ranks Explained
Ranks are given for playing in onchain and social games:
Onchain activity: Trading jettons and NFTs, receiving airdrops, staking, and more.
Social graph: Connect your network to REP and earn REP, simple.
There are 7 ranks based on the percentage of total REP profiles:
👑 - o, top 0.5%, o like 0, like a planet, coin, buble - everything¬hing.
🤙 - yo, top 2%. You’re super cool, but you need to…
Every message, every interaction — you’ve been shaping history in Telegram without knowing it. Now, the time has come to reveal your impact and take on new challenges. Let’s begin.
👀 ENTER TREASURY
Should We Launch A New Token On TON For Everyone Here?
Yes79%
No21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tapswapcombos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should We Launch A New Token On TON For Everyone Here?
Yes79%
No21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 24 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 815,842 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@tapswapcombos named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pawsog_bot named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
@starsfibot named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DAILY COMBO 🔑” (@tapswapcombos), 8,379 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tapswapcombos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.