Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

素材【欧洲男】【@dingzhi926小萌套图】

@taotu9n

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,592subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002645595494
TypeChannel
Username@taotu9n
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/taotu9n

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@taotu9n/222 · this entry3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC@TG_OQ005/12334 Jun 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0013 hours
@taotu9n/223 · this entry3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC@TG_OQ005/12344 Jun 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0013 hours
@taotu9n/224 · this entry3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC@TG_OQ005/12354 Jun 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0013 hours
@taotu9n/225 · this entry3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC@TG_OQ005/12364 Jun 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0013 hours
@taotu9n/227 · this entry3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC@TG_OQ005/12384 Jun 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0013 hours
@taotu9n/228 · this entry3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC@TG_OQ005/12394 Jun 2026, 03:53 UTC1.0013 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@TG_OQ00510 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0013 hoursthis entry (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 May 2026 to 3 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @taotu9n — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,5921,5971,594.57 August 2026 — 1,597 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,591–1,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:071,592-5
7 Aug 2026, 11:011,597no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:501,597first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC13 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚡️⚡️😍😍欢迎加入小丸子工作室😘感谢新老客户的信任 😘小丸子人设套图素材业务如下:😭😜💋😌 😮精品套图【亚洲女】 😮人设套图【亚洲女】 😮精品套图【亚洲男】 😮人设套图【亚洲男】 😮精品套图【欧洲女】 😮人设套图【欧洲女】 😮精品套图【欧洲男】 😮人设套图【欧洲男】 😮精品套图【女私密】 😘小丸子精聊业务全方位掌控:😘❤️😊 😞【美工】证件 P图 😞【绘画】私人定制 😞【会员】官方秒开 😞【代购】全球配送 😞【代洗】人物照片 😞【飞机】业务齐全 😞【免费】美食素材 😞【免费】话术素材 😊客服:@taotul168 小丸子 😊双向客服: @taotul168_bot 支付方式:😊😊⚡️🙂😊😊😊😃☺️😃☺️

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD49 素材简介:#法国 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 素材比较接近真实普通人生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 【图片658张 视频65张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC8 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD50 素材简介:#英国 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 素材比较接近真实普通人生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 【图片1627张 视频449张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC10 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD51 素材简介:#西班牙 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 素材比较接近真实普通人生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 【图片2112张 视频179张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD42 素材简介:#法国 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 高大上生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 宝爸 【图片306张 视频1张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD43 素材简介:#意大利 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 高大上生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 【图片1371张 视频54张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD44 素材简介:#法国 合适45至55岁人设 素材整体表现比较放松 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 素材比较接近真实普通人生活 宝爸 【图片411张 视频33张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD45 素材简介:#意大利 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 高大上生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 【图片377张 视频37张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号ADD46 精品:10U 素材简介:#阿联酋 合适45至55岁人设 成功人士 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 高大上生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 【图片967张 视频174张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD47 素材简介:#法国 合适45至55岁人设 职业: 机长 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 【图片218张 视频13张】 (带IG持续更新)

3 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

编号DD48 素材简介:#英国 合适45至55岁人设 腹肌 健身 欧美型男 素材整体表现比较放松 素材比较接近真实普通人生活 更多的是看起来比较热爱生活 热爱运动 居家 热爱旅行 自拍多 宝爸 【图片898张 视频52张】 (带IG持续更新)

5 May 2026, 17:57 UTC8 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚡️⚡️😍😍欢迎加入小丸子工作室😘感谢新老客户的信任 😘小丸子人设套图素材业务如下:😭😜💋😌 😮精品套图【亚洲女】 😮人设套图【亚洲女】 😮精品套图【亚洲男】 😮人设套图【亚洲男】 😮精品套图【欧洲女】 😮人设套图【欧洲女】 😮精品套图【欧洲男】 😮人设套图【欧洲男】 😮精品套图【女私密】 😘小丸子精聊业务全方位掌控:😘❤️😊 😞【美工】证件 P图 😞【绘画】私人定制 😞【会员】官方秒开 😞【代购】全球配送 😞【代洗】人物照片 😞【飞机】业务齐全 😞【免费】美食素材 😞【免费】话术素材 😊客服:@taotul168 小丸子 😊双向客服: @taotul168_bot 支付方式:😊😊⚡️🙂😊😊😊😃☺️😃☺️

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @taotu9n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 743,970 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“素材【欧洲男】【@dingzhi926小萌套图】” (@taotu9n), 1,592 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taotu9n.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.