Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tantra Nectar - International

Channel

Tantra Nectar - International

@tantranectar_eng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,736subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431836888
TypeChannel
Username@tantranectar_eng
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tantranectar_eng

Growth

3,7363,7793,757.57 August 2026 — 3,779 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,779 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,778 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,768 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,764 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,757 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,748 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,739 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,736 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,730–3,785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 07:453,736-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:193,739-9
20 Aug 2026, 08:123,748-9
17 Aug 2026, 11:393,757-7
14 Aug 2026, 02:373,764-4
11 Aug 2026, 04:523,768-10
8 Aug 2026, 03:573,778-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:463,779no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:363,779first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.27%
avg views ÷ 3,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
272
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.766%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,172
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 05s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2561.0%
🔥1229.3%
12.44%
👍12.44%
💯12.44%
🙏12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🕉 Do you notice that the new person in your life turns out suspiciously like the last one? A different name, a different face, and a couple of months later the same fights, the same hurts, the same dead end. As if you keep walking in a circle, and only the faces change. The truth is simple: we are slaves to our own unconscious habits. The same script runs on its own, and again we say and do the things we never real

1

6 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC176 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤲 We stay most silent about the most alive thing in us. I mean sexual energy. It is our life force: drive, the wish to want, the taste for life, the very sense of being alive. But we were taught to be ashamed of it and to hide it for so long that one day it goes quiet. And in place of living desire, a dull tension settles in, one that has become almost familiar. Tantric massage works exactly with this. Through gent

5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC240 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤲 A massage people fly to the other side of the world for. It sounds strange. You can learn massage almost anywhere, closer and easier. But people do not travel to India for three weeks for the techniques. They go for what you cannot pass through on the side. For the silence in which you can hear your own body. For the experience of first being touched so gently that what has been building up inside for years begin

21💯1

4 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC274 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

You can text someone brilliantly for weeks, and then meet in person and watch it all fade within ten minutes. In messages it is easy to make an impression. There is time to think, to pick the right words, to show your best side. A real meeting reads something else entirely: how you breathe, how you hold yourself, whether there is that current between you. Attraction does not live in words. It lives in the body, in

1

3 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC311 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🕉 When was the last time you wanted something very badly? Not because you "should". Not because it was "right". But because there was a real, living "I want" inside. Sometimes you notice it in something small. You open the menu at a restaurant and realise that, honestly, you do not really care. A strange thing: we know how to make decisions, how to take responsibility, how to keep our emotions under control. But w

1

1 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC363 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🫶 Do you remember how, as a child, you could want something so much it made you tremble, without any embarrassment? Ice cream, a trip, the morning of your birthday. The wish was in the whole body, you reached for it completely and never wondered whether it was appropriate. And then, between "I want" and us, a lot grew up. "Should I". "Is it reasonable". "What will they think". "Will it even work out". And desire le

31 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC370 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🫶 Say "tantric massage", and everyone hears something different. Some picture care and warmth. Some picture eroticism. Some picture something they would feel awkward saying out loud. And the confusion is not random: three very different intentions live inside one word. The first is the touch of pure love. No goal, no attraction. You can touch a friend, someone close, a family member, simply to pass on warmth. The b

30 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC349 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤲 A good touch begins long before you actually touch another person. It begins with you. Do you notice your own breath, the tension in your body, the wish of your hands to hurry up and "do it right". All of it can be felt in the very quality of the touch: a restless touch feels completely different from a calm one. That is why in tantric massage you first learn not the movements, but yourself. To bring sensitivity

29 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC374 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🧘‍♀️ You can love each other and almost stop wanting each other. The tenderness is there, the care is there, but the spark has gone somewhere, and it is hard to say when. Often three things quietly happen before that. First, you become too predictable to each other. Everything is known in advance: what will be said, how they will look, how the evening will end. And with it, the sense of mystery slips away. Then th

🔥3👍1🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC371 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🕉 What do you do when you want something very badly? Do you go after it, or quietly stop yourself? Most of us were taught only two options. Either chase the desire and get it at any cost, or hold ourselves back, explain why we shouldn't, quietly dim the fire inside until it settles. But there is a third one, which almost no one talks about. Not to fulfil the desire and not to suppress it, but to stay inside that ve

1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC393 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤲 After a good tantric massage, an unexpected thought arises: I want to be able to do that too. At first you simply receive. You are touched with care and attention, and the body lets go of some of its usual tension. A quietness comes, and trust, and the feeling of being fully accepted. And then a quiet wish is born. Not to “become a masseur,” not a profession for income. You want to one day be able to give another

3🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC467 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🕊️ You can be exhausted without doing a thing. What drains you isn't the work. It's having to bend yourself to everyone around you. Smile when you don't feel like it. Agree just to avoid an argument. Bite your tongue so you don't seem odd. Small things, a hundred times a day, barely noticed. And by evening you feel like you've spent it hauling bricks. And here's the frustrating part: the workload has almost nothing

2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tantranectar_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPPCS POLICE CONSTABLE UPSSSC PET
@up_police_constable_upsssc_pet_Q · 44,129
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tantra Nectar - International” (@tantranectar_eng), 3,736 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tantranectar_eng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.