Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tanja Mo 🍀❤️🙏

Channel

Tanja Mo 🍀❤️🙏

@tanjaskanal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,821subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001345182928
TypeChannel
Username@tanjaskanal
Created10 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tanjaskanal

Growth

1,8211,8231,8226 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,821–1,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:071,821-1
13 Aug 2026, 13:351,822-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:431,823+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,822no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:531,822first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 1,821 subscribers
Avg views / post
246
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total246
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 08s
Average length
3m 04s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2238.6%
1221.1%
🥰1017.5%
🤣47.02%
👏35.26%
🙏35.26%
🤓23.51%
😁11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC246 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

☺️ Cern war ja schon Thema in einer meiner letzten Sprachmemos. Mir kamen beim Hören dieses Videos paar Ideen, wofür sie den Umbau brauchen könnten: 1. Eine Reise in die Vergangenheit, weil sie wissen, dass die Dinge aus dem Ruder gelaufen sind und sie etwas ändern müssen, was sie versäumt haben. 🎲 2. Sie suchen einen Weg, die Erde zu verlassen. (Wurden sie verlassen? Wollen sie zurück). 🛸 3. Sie brauchen Verstär

👍4

13 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC449 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Wie sch😍n ist das❣️ Ich dachte erst, ich würde einen alten Kaugummiautomaten entdecken und war schon ganz nostalgisch... Und dann diese schöne Idee mit dem 🐝🐝🐝 -futterautomaten. 😍 💛 Hoffentlich wird er bald wieder genutzt. 🌼🐝 🌸🐝 🌼🐝 Und bis dahin: denkt daran, dass unsere Kleinsten viele leckere Blüten benötigen, Wildkräuter und zumindest in dieser heißen Zeit eine gefüllte Wasserstelle (ich habe dazu ei

🥰72

12 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC383 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🗿 "Steine als Tore zu anderen Bewusstseinsformen." ☺️ Johannes von Buttlar, nach heutigem Wikipedia-Eintrag ein esoterischer Betrüger (meine polemische Kurzfassung, entschuldige bitte), bekam damals sehr viel Raum vom Norddeutschen Rundfunk. 😉 Wieso wohl? 😎 🎬 Ein sehr magisches Video über Flüsternde Steine, Steinkreise, Kristalle, Pyramiden, Außerirdische, Leylinien, Geomantie, Schamanen, Portale. 💫 🧲 Zu der magn

👍3👏1

12 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC296 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Könnten wir ewig leben? 0:00 Verlust von Lebensenergien 1:29 Aktiviere Deine Schutzkugel! 2:01 Ist ewiges Leben möglich? 2:16 Die Virenfrage 🤪 3:08 Was uns krank macht... 3:38 Lichtenergie 3:51 Andere Wesen, andere Wünsche... 💫 Können wir einen dauerhaften wirksamen Schutz visualieren? Und im Nachtrag: Wenn wir das könnten, würden es dann wirklich wollen? 😇 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ Danke für ein 👍 oder ein Teilen

3👍3

6 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC412 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💫 Vom Höhlengleichnis bis zur Matrix, von Idealismus bis Materialismus. ~ ❌ Bis auf einen kleinen 'Fehler': Es wird NICHT unentschieden ausgehen. 😉 1. Es ist kein Fehler, sondern garantiert Absicht ( halt ÖR). 😈 2. Nach Paretoprinzip mussten irgendwo die 20% 'Abweichung' sein. 📊 3. Der Materialismus ist den Idealismus untergeordnet. Der hat nämlich mehr Ebenen und Verknüpfungen... 💫 => Wir gestalten unsere Welt

2

6 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC295 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Platons Höhlengleichnis ++++++++++++++++++++++ ⛓ In einer Höhle sind Menschen an Ketten gefesselt. Sie können nur eines sehen: die Felswand vor sich. Nicht sich selbst oder die anderen Menschen. 🔥 Hinter ihnen flackert ein Feuer. Die Schatten, die das Feuer auf die Felswand projiziert, halten sie für die Wirklichkeit. 🌞 Ein Mensch kann sich befreien. Er verlässt die Höhle. Sieht zum ersten Mal die Sonne, muss s

3👍2🙏1

6 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC283 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Neujahrs-Orakel 🎉 Durchbruch 🚀 + Veränderung 🦋 + Klarheit 💡 = Wohlstand 💰 Der liebe B. hatte die obigen Begriffe als Losung beim Neujahrs-Orakel für dieses Jahr und fragte nach meiner Einschätzung dazu. Hier ist das, was mir dazu kam. 📜 1:28 Das Orakel - Zufall oder für uns bestimmt? 🔮 4:03 Alles hat eine Bedeutung 🌟 4:29 Gott oder Intuition 🤔 5:17 Die Begriffe 📝 5:46 Der Durchbruch - Muster verlassen und

🙏2👍1🥰1

6 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC242 viewsread 7 August 2026

☺️ Lieber B., vielen Dank für Deine Frage! Letztendlich hatte sie mich zu dem Gedanken über Jung und das Consciousness Project geführt. Ich war nur unsicher, ob ich Deine Frage richtig verstanden hatte.... Daher erst jetzt:

5 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC269 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Das wird ja ein höllisch gutes Fest... 😈 🌈 Der Tippfehler macht aus der bunten Party eine düstere Veranstaltung." 🧐 Nein, nicht der Tippfehler... 🤐 „Wir kommen alle in die Hölle, aber zum CSD dürfen wir raus.“ 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ 💫 ✨ Danke für ein 👍 oder ein Teilen und Verbreiten: https://t.me/tanjaskanal

🤓1

5 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC289 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

😳 Was verbindet das Kollektive Unbewusste nach Carl Gustav Jung mit dem Global Consciousness Project von der Princeton University⁉️✨ 0:41 Carl Gustav Jung und Sigmund Freud 🧠 1:29 Psychisches Erbe der Menschheit 🌍 2:51 Umstrittene These ⚖️ 3:31 Datenbank - Cloud - Arkasha-Chronik ☁️ 4:17 Archetypen 🎭 4:56 Das Erbe unserer Ahnen 👴👵 6:06 Jungs Ziel 🎯 7:04 Project der Princeton University 🏛️ 8:54 9/11 9:14 Kritik 🗣️ 9:

🥰2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tanjaskanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,242,502 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tanja Mo 🍀❤️🙏” (@tanjaskanal), 1,821 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanjaskanal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.