5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,491–2,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:17
2,493
-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:46
2,497
-6
8 Aug 2026, 01:56
2,503
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:33
2,504
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:56
2,504
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 2,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
397
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held
20 (3 July 2026 – 18 July 2026)
Views total
1,985
Reactions total
59
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
241 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😍
44
18.3%
🔥
41
17.0%
❤🔥
36
14.9%
💯
26
10.8%
🤝
16
6.64%
😢
13
5.39%
💋
12
4.98%
👍
11
4.56%
👌
10
4.15%
🤔
7
2.90%
😁
6
2.49%
custom 5249484362621141855
4
1.66%
🍓
3
1.24%
🤨
3
1.24%
🥰
3
1.24%
👏
2
0.83%
💔
2
0.83%
custom 5235728802142759605
1
0.415%
🤗
1
0.415%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мамкина вайбкодерка
ууууу берегись народ женский, я сегодня устраивала шабаш установки клода на винду через обход всех блокировок
для вас лично когда-нибудь загружали в тех поддержке приложение в файлообменник? а для меня да. имя Ибрагим вам о чем-нибудь говорит?
ой, даже не вникайте, я просто сделала большой технический шаг САМА и в легких шоках ложусь спать, чтобы утром скорее приступить к работе создания сексуа…
А давайте мы начнем упражняться в реальной жизни и формировать свою новую личность вместе?)
1. Я такой человек (вот ты, кто это читает), который ставит реакции Танисе на посты и кружочки, потому что я хороший благодарный человек, а Таниса сладкая булочка 🤩
Подписаться здесь 👇
Ну ведь так?
Попала в ваш хит-парад мыслей?
Что у вас «слишком» и чего «не хватает»?
Какие мысли доминируют у вас в голове? Какие эмоции?
Скажу за себя: я подхожу к своей жизни сейчас осознанно, насколько удается прокаченной мышце осознанности — это когда ты реально понимаешь что и зачем думаешь, делаешь или чувствуешь.
Но! Я жалуюсь себе на холод ностальгируя по Таиланду…
А в тюрьме сейчас ужин…макароны…
То, что …
Сейчас ощутила по максимуму возвращение на родину.
За одну минуту мне ударил по попе проезжающий курьер Яндекса на мопеде, я сделала 3 шага вперед и изрядно выпивающие мужчины на лавочке кричали мне слова, проявляющие знаки внимания на их языке
Когда я начала записывать кружочек на встречу мне шел мужчина, который сделал адекватный комплимент.
Итог: 3 разных проявления внимания из которых одно приемлемое, одно неп…
Есть у меня тут те, кто отказался от мяса?
Я похоже все(( не могу, не нравится ощущения после мясных яств 🤌🤌
Но! Есть новость очень хорошая — готов тест по ценностям, благодаря которому можно прочитать из какой идентичности ты живешь, действуешь и выбираешь окружение 🥰💃
Отправляю его подругам, тестят )) скоро доберусь до закрытого чата и там разберем его 🌚
❤🔥7👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tanissa_freedom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
в тренде у девочек @females · 577,899 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tanisa ❤️🔥 freedom” (@tanissa_freedom), 2,493 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanissa_freedom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.