https://youtu.be/uwEjuiyeMwY?si=A8hAvq4Cb6VgVVje
โค3
Signed Tanishq Fx

Channel
@tanishqinternational
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
12,339subscribers
+117 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002537674870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tanishqinternational |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tanishqinternational |
Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:56 | 12,339 | +4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:57 | 12,335 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:27 | 12,332 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:18 | 12,335 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:11 | 12,330 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 12,328 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:59 | 12,329 | +10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 12,319 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 12,322 | +18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 12,304 | +24 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 12,280 | +13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 12,267 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 12,264 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 12,262 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:04 | 12,261 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 12,255 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 12,256 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:26 | 12,258 | +11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 12,247 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 12,246 | first reading |
133 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (15 August 2026 โ 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,054 |
| Reactions total | 231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
1,129 reactions across 108 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 690 | 61.1% | |
| ๐ฅ | 112 | 9.92% | |
| ๐ฟ | 74 | 6.55% | |
| ๐คฃ | 53 | 4.69% | |
| ๐ | 41 | 3.63% | |
| ๐คท | 36 | 3.19% | |
| ๐ญ | 28 | 2.48% | |
| ๐ | 20 | 1.77% | |
| ๐คช | 19 | 1.68% | |
| ๐ | 16 | 1.42% | |
| ๐ | 13 | 1.15% | |
| ๐ | 10 | 0.886% | |
| ๐คฉ | 7 | 0.62% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.354% | |
| ๐ป | 2 | 0.177% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.177% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.177% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 1,129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 4 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://youtu.be/uwEjuiyeMwY?si=A8hAvq4Cb6VgVVje
โค3
Signed Tanishq Fx
Good morning mittro
๐คช1
Signed Gััะบััะฐั ๐
Here's the project file https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L91rYjkeTNZe5QlHwcHHS2vESnAzNjO0/view?usp=drivesdk
Signed ace7fx_.
Omino Diffusion + Ripple Dissolve Transition Software: Nova Editor Goal: 17 Reactions Watermark Also Included
โค13
Signed ace7fx_.
Sticker, posted without a caption
๐2
Signed Trufal AE
WANT THORโก๏ธ PFP RACE ? DROP 20+ REACTS MADE BY @KIRXT_MEHRA SOFTWARE - AMZ PAID ALSO AVAILABLE DM NOW
๐ฅ5๐ฟ1
Signed Gััะบััะฐั ๐
Want This intro At 20 Reactions Made by - @nigaman123 Shared by - @nigaman123
โค1
Signed Trixx
Want this Van pelt Freakky Intro? drop 10 reactions tracked topazed 2x 60 fps
โค13๐ฅ3๐คท1
Signed || Mystic Gokuu ||
DexEdits Intro Remake Software: Nova Editor Target: 15 Reactions ๐๏ธ
โค17
Signed ace7fx_.
Happy birthday son goki๐ก Chal party de
๐ญ5๐คช3
Signed เฆเฆฎเฆชเงเฆฒเฆฟเฆเงเฆธ Kumar
Target completed ๐ป Here's the link ๐๏ธ ๐ " Click me " ๐
โค2
Signed Trufal AE
Happy birthday Goku sir ๐๐ฐ
โค9
Signed KAIROS FX
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @tanishqinternational. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@tanishqinternational edited 1 post after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 4 posts on @tanishqinternational as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
??
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ง๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ต๐พ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐นโ (@tanishqinternational), 12,339 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tanishqinternational.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.