Хорошая идея... Возможно будет
❤89custom 519732979306177522417custom 519770584751331171214🔥6🍓1🥱1

Channel
@tangyu_onelovenariki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,812subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002875879567 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tangyu_onelovenariki |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tangyu_onelovenariki |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 1,812 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 1,817 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 1,816 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 1,819 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:07 | 1,824 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 1,827 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 1,832 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 1,836 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 1,849 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 1,855 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 1,865 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 1,864 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,321 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,015 | 43.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 515 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5197705847513311712 | 235 | 10.1% | |
| 🙏 | 127 | 5.47% | |
| custom 5197329793061775224 | 107 | 4.61% | |
| custom 5197446762201115375 | 90 | 3.88% | |
| 🍓 | 59 | 2.54% | |
| 🥰 | 52 | 2.24% | |
| 🥱 | 38 | 1.64% | |
| ⚡ | 24 | 1.03% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 0.948% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 0.732% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 0.689% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.086% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.043% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.043% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tangyu_onelovenariki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хорошая идея... Возможно будет
❤89custom 519732979306177522417custom 519770584751331171214🔥6🍓1🥱1
Почему-то вижу лишь врагов С Нам Гю даже как-то больше 333 вижу, и то потому что Гю немножко крыса и метнулся к нему Но кстати с девчонками Танос хорошо смотрится(конкретно Сэ Ми/Ми На)
custom 519770584751331171247🍓13❤🔥9custom 51973297930617752244
Прикольные шипы 095 с 120, единичка и гг, Сэ Ми и Мин Су, Сэ Ми и Сэ Бёк(девочка из первого сезона, понравились арты с ними) Хоть меня слегка и передёргивает когда Таноса или Нам Гю шипперят с другими, но думаю, что 333 и Гю частично смотрятся неплохо (по крайней мере они взаимодействовали в 3 сезоне и я понимаю чё их шипперят) Вообще не воспринимаю шип Нам Гю с Дэ Хо 😒😒😒 Можете кидать тапками
❤81custom 519744676220111537514❤🔥11🙏3🥱2custom 51977058475133117122🍓1custom 51973297930617752241
Мои бусинки... Хочу когда-нибудь нарисовать команду таноса полным составом...
❤116❤🔥25custom 519744676220111537519custom 51973297930617752248🙏4🥰1🥱1custom 51977058475133117121
Малята, можете поздравить меня: поступила на БЮДЖЕТ Сосать🙌🙌🙌🙌
❤143custom 519732979306177522438🙏29custom 519744676220111537513🥰6❤🔥5🥱2🍓1
Мои хорошие, пока я буду занята другими долгами вы решите что мне доделать из следующего 😂
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤29custom 51973297930617752246custom 51977058475133117126🙏1
Итак, по старинке, если не залетит в реки то тт мразь😾 Изменено: тт мразь:)
❤72🙏17😭11❤🔥3🥱3
File, posted without a caption
🥰24❤9🙏3
Также имба, что играла во время процесса 9 часов
❤56🙏10🥱7😭1custom 51977058475133117121
Изначально хотела сделать покрас как в мульте (т.е. более плоский), но ебучий перфекционизм послал меня нахуй
❤158🍓33⚡24custom 519732979306177522411🙏4custom 51977058475133117124🐳2custom 51974467622011153752
Та хз если честно, мне пока хорошо с хэдами (в целом на них канал и построен)
❤67custom 519770584751331171211🥱7custom 51974467622011153753🔥2custom 51973297930617752241
Та есть немного, и неудивительно Я за всю свою жизнь так много не рисовала одних и тех же персов😮 (надо посчитать сколько уже артов..)
❤🔥54❤11🍓8🥱2custom 51974467622011153752custom 51977058475133117122custom 51973297930617752241
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tangyu_onelovenariki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мои хорошие, пока я буду занята другими долгами вы решите что мне доделать из следующего 😂
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“так и сяк” (@tangyu_onelovenariki), 1,812 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tangyu_onelovenariki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.