Channel name was changed to «糖糖☀️私密圈 外出无押金🌹»

Channel
糖糖☀️私密圈 外出无押金🌹
@tangtangjianzhi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+67 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003566655180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tangtangjianzhi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tangtangjianzhi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 81 | +67 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 16 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 50.9%
- avg views ÷ 81 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.2
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (16 September 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 536 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 46s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
【老师艺名】糖糖 【联系方式】 @tangtangjianzi 【上课地址】全季 【上课价位】1200两次 【验证留名】778 【颜值身材】完美白 【服务内容】课表 【服务态度】非常满意 【优点缺点】很强的教师感,很热情,有点羞涩 【体验细节】很娇小,《本人180身高》表情到位细节完美 让我有一种玩坏的感觉,说话声音真的很好听点一点羞涩,可爱至极,身材完美,白白的,做起来服务很认证,纯纯的蜜桃臀,白白软软的后入真的很让人受不了,第一次很快就缴枪了,第二次体验很美妙,他在上那娇小的身体害羞的表情 完美。兄弟们无脑冲,不要玩坏! 温馨提示:报告仅供参考
🈳闲🉑约
我可以扮演你欢喜的那个,可以给你我最热情的贴贴,🐶🐶🐶
都是风景 幸会💞
这次真的有点痛😞
认识的太简单 暧昧的太简单
别隔着屏幕想我,下次见面,让你近距离好好感受我。🙈🙈🙈
Sticker, posted without a caption
别隔着屏幕想我,下次见面,让你近距离好好感受我。🥰🥰
🉑约 不懂🉑问👫
糖糖☀️私密圈 外出无押金🌹 pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @tangtangjianzhi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“糖糖☀️私密圈 外出无押金🌹” (@tangtangjianzhi), 81 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tangtangjianzhi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.