🤩 🤩щешь канал по учебе, мотивации и с полезными материалами? 🤩 ໒ 🤩꒱ ゚ 🤩 〢 . 🤩 자신을☆
Signed Обноляю список Сорен #.@trueArthuria XDD

Channel
@talktouscf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,447subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002247980540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talktouscf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talktouscf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:40 | 3,447 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 3,439 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 3,435 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 3,434 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,804 |
| Reactions total | 114 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
114 reactions across 23 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 31.6% | |
| 🤡 | 20 | 17.5% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 14.9% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 🤩щешь канал по учебе, мотивации и с полезными материалами? 🤩 ໒ 🤩꒱ ゚ 🤩 〢 . 🤩 자신을☆
Signed Обноляю список Сорен #.@trueArthuria XDD
🔤ечный админ набор 🌟 🪦🤩икчи кф + дефли 🎸🎸🌟 - 💕 так хочу себе много пикч 🤩🤩 🌟- 🤩🤍не так не хватает пикч по утрам🤩🤩🤩 🤗 - 🤩 👁мм... в тик токе сказали что мою мамку завтра сожрут... что в ответ можно кинуть ❓🤩🤩 🤩🤩🔤ы готовы тебе помочь!!! 🌩.🌩.🌩.🌩.🌩.🌩.🌩.🌩 «Пикча» — это жаргонное слово, заимствованное из английского языка (от picture — «картина, изображение»). В молодёжном сленге и интернет‑сообществах оно озн…
Signed Обноляю список Сорен #.@trueArthuria XDD
бляя как же я заебалась от НЕОПРЕДЕЛЁННОСТИ Вот так было хорошо когда-то копать в себя, узнавать что-то новое, читать больше о психиатрии и психологии.. а потом в какой-то момент всё ёбнулось и я нихуя не понимаю че со мной. Вот вообще. Это какое-то подобие алекситимии (а может оно и есть), я теперь не могу ниче нормально описать, начиная от состояния моей души и каких-то глубинных вопросов во время рефлексии, заканч…
😭2❤1
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
я зайбался уже блят, вечно такой прикол типа на какое то время от пары дней до недель ощущение что все плохо, жизнь гавно и мя все ненавидят, срз настока плохо становится что хоть что то делать нехочется, а потом резко в рандом дни мне становится нормально, даже хорошо, думаю "все плохое позади вот я такой крутой и надо тока двигатся вперед я все пабедю)))" и одновременно уже предчувствую что все это ненадолго, я уже…
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
https://t.me/talktouscf/68455 он мне кстате ответил,но седня мы очень мало переписывались так что мне как то грустно что он не может уделить мне..больше времени?изза того что был занят уборкой Я его обожаю блин ⢠🎹「#take 」🍙 𝒯𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧、 凸(Ò﹏Ó) @talktouscfbot🎬
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
Почему так сложно выбрать ресницы... Хочется не просто веники, а больше с уклоном на пучки, но не прям пучки, потому что выглядит так будто лысые глаза и жирные пучки. Я не знаю💀 ⢠🎹「#take 」🍙 𝒯𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧、 凸(Ò﹏Ó) @talktouscfbot🎬
🤝5❤1🤡1🙏1
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
Мне грустно что у большинства людей мозг сам отсеивает лишнее, типа фоновый шум, свет, как одежда касается тела, чужие эмоции. Они этого даже не замечают. У меня это слаьовато и периодами я оочень чувствую все это и иногда это так... Бля. Я слышу всё одновременно, как тикают часы, как кто-то на фоне разговаривает, даже слова разобрать могу, хотя со мной и так разговаривают напрямую прям щас, чувствую как ткань трётс…
🤔1🤝1
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
мама пообещала мне что я поеду с ней в свой родной город и смогу там увидеться со своими ЕДИНСТВЕННЫМИ друзьями, но из-за проблем со здоровьем у бабушки я остаюсь в ебаном Петербурге, и теперь я вообще не знаю когда смогу хоть примерно увидеться с близкими. я никогда не хотела уезжать сюда, да, тут круто, дохуя возможностей, пятое десятое, и наверное то, что я не могу здесь завести друзей уже второй год - сугубо моя …
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
Мне кажется, понятие «селфинсерта» знатно похерили. Потому что теперь таковым называют буквально любого персонажа, в которого автор вложил какую-то часть своей жизни (что, сука, абсолютно нормально, потому что это опыт, о котором человек смело может говорить, потому что пережил его), а если хоть что-то похоже на селф инсерт — значит хуета ебаная и автор самовлюбленное чмо. А если персонаж проблематик, то всё, пизда р…
❤4💘2🙏1
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
Мне так смешно с тех, кто ненавидит ислам и исключает исламофобию из базового дни. Так как по факту христианство делает ровно тоже самое, за что эти челики ненавидят ислам, но к нему у них никогда вопросов нет ⢠🎹「#take 」🍙 𝒯𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧、 凸(Ò﹏Ó) @talktouscfbot🎬
❤2👀2
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
почему всем досталось по две котлеты, а мне одна почему меня мама ненавидит ⢠🎹「#take 」🍙 𝒯𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧、 凸(Ò﹏Ó) @talktouscfbot🎬
💔4❤2👍1
Signed 𝒯𝘢𝘬e𝘴 “𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧„
🍭 💭🌟 🌟 𝙃𝙀𝙇𝙇𝙊 ❗️💭 💭 🔤аришь за 🔤роб и хочешь впитывать в себя больше контента по нему ❓ 🌟 🤩 Тут все необходимое арты,видяшки,эдиты 🤩 🕯 🎀 🖤 𝐶𝑂𝑀𝐸 𝐴𝑁𝐷 𝑆𝐸𝐸 𝑀𝐸 https://t.me/tyytyyuiop 💕 🎀🎀
👎4🤡4😢1
Signed Гайки И Болты [🔩⚙]
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @talktouscf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 130,705 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒯 𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴 𝘤𝘧、「🫂❤️🩹」” (@talktouscf), 3,447 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talktouscf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.