Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حرف زدن برای حرف زدن

Channel

حرف زدن برای حرف زدن

@talesofnewbeginnings

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,156subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168480017
TypeChannel
Username@talesofnewbeginnings
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/talesofnewbeginnings

Growth

1,1541,1581,1567 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,154 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,154 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,156 subscribers7 August 202619 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 12 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,153–1,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 09:251,156-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:431,158+3
10 Aug 2026, 16:021,155+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:461,154no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,154-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:361,155first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.6%
avg views ÷ 1,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
539
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,782
Reactions total299
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14949.8%
3511.7%
😭289.36%
🥰279.03%
🔥268.70%
🕊258.36%
🐳41.34%
🫡31.00%
🌚20.669%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @talesofnewbeginnings. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC239 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یه جلسه داشتم با یکی واسه مشاوره‌ی مهاجرت، بهم گفت من ۳۴ سالمه و فکر میکنم دیر شده. من به خودم ولی همیشه یاد اوری میکنم که: تو چه این کارو بکنی، چه نکنی، ۱۰ سال دیگه، ۱۰ سال از الان سنت بیشتره! آدم یه وقتایی بدون اینکه متوجه باشه، فکر میکنه اگه این کاره رو انجامش نده، توی همون سن میمونه و سنش بیشتر نمیشه :)

👍16🥰3

6 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC309 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

به عینه تجربه ش کردم. هزینه‌ی انتخاب آدم های اشتباه برای راه دادن به زندگیم سنگین بود. اندازه‌ی این حرفا نبودن که به زندگیم لطمه بزنن، منتها به آدم ها بی اعتمادم کردن! وجه مثبتش اما این بود که فهمیدم همه‌ی آدم ها لیاقت شنیدن داستان هام رو ندارن! فهمیدم داستان هام از خیلی از آدم ها بزرگتره، و برای فهمیدنش مجبورن تا اندازه‌ی خودشون تقلیلش بدن :)))

7👍7

6 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC665 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

گفت: که چی؟ گفتم: وقتی سوالت اینه؛ یعنی داری جوری که دوست نداری زندگی میکنی. آدم واسه اتفاقای خوب نمیپرسه که چی! کیفشو میکنه.

👍7🔥1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC357 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بحثم حکم کلی نیست‌. شناخت ظرفیته. ادم معمولا بدون اینکه بفهمن جذب بیرون زدگی کارکتر مبارزه میشه و بدون اینکه بفهمه زخم میخوره و بدون اینکه بفهمه متنفر میشه. اما وقتی هوشیار به اون شخص مبارز نزدیک بشه، مسئولیت نزدیکی به اون فرد رو میپذیره، فاصله رو تنظیم میکنه، و روی مبارز سقوط نمیکنه.

👍5

6 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC360 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ببین من یه چیزی فهمیدم. کسی که در لوای ساختار شکنی زیست میکنه و یه بلندگو گرفته دستش و میگه آهای منو ببینید من دارم ساختار میشکنم، انسان امنی نیست. (این در مورد خودمم صدق میکنه) نه که سیک طرف رو بزنم ها، ولی شاخکام تیز میشه، چون این شکل از بودن نشانگر یک مبارزه ی درونی و روانی مداومه. این ادم در یک جنگ نامرئی ذهنیه که ممکنه گاهی تو رو هم به عنوان دشمن فرضی زخمی کنه. انسانی که ساختار نو درست کرده و به ساختار های معم

👍12😭3

5 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC384 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تجربه نشون داده همیشه عاقبت گنده گوزیدن اینه که تهش یواشکی گوله کنی از گوشه بری :))

11👍5🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC408 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

حرف زدن دیگه شبیه قبل نیست :) چنان معناها داره برام تغییر میکنه و نسبتم با زندگی عوض میشه که اسم این کانال هم دیگه عجیب شده‌..!

🕊15👍4🌚1

3 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC558 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

گفت من اگه اینستامو پاک کنم ارتباطم با همین ۴ تا رفیق ایرانم تموم میشه و بعدش دیگه یادشون میره منو...!

😭20🕊2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC558 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بزرگ شدم و هی دارم بزرگ میشم!

🕊8🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC614 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

was die Leute denken, ist scheißegal.

5👍3

1 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC725 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اسباب بازی جدیدم :")))

🔥20🥰11🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @talesofnewbeginnings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حرف زدن برای حرف زدن” (@talesofnewbeginnings), 1,156 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talesofnewbeginnings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.