Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТАК СЕБЕ ЯРИК

Channel

ТАК СЕБЕ ЯРИК

@taksebeyarik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

57,019subscribers

-295 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600868778
TypeChannel
Username@taksebeyarik
CreatedBetween 1 October 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/taksebeyarik

Growth

57,01957,31457,166.56 August 2026 — 57,314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 57,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 57,267 subscribers9 August 2026 — 57,229 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57,227 subscribers11 August 2026 — 57,190 subscribers12 August 2026 — 57,144 subscribers13 August 2026 — 57,112 subscribers14 August 2026 — 57,073 subscribers16 August 2026 — 57,043 subscribers17 August 2026 — 57,019 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,975–57,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:5557,019-24
16 Aug 2026, 05:1557,043-30
14 Aug 2026, 18:4757,073-39
13 Aug 2026, 09:1457,112-32
12 Aug 2026, 08:1857,144-46
11 Aug 2026, 08:2357,190-37
10 Aug 2026, 05:0057,227-2
9 Aug 2026, 04:1257,229-38
8 Aug 2026, 07:2457,267-39
7 Aug 2026, 06:5257,306-8
6 Aug 2026, 20:1657,314first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 57,019 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,100
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held48 (31 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total723,210
Reactions total53,176
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

53,176 reactions across 48 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
40,43676.0%
❤‍🔥6,49112.2%
🔥1,2702.39%
😢1,1432.15%
🎉9611.81%
🤣8051.51%
🌚3940.741%
😱2560.481%
2380.448%
👍2260.425%
😁2020.38%
🕊1990.374%
🤯1910.359%
🐳940.177%
🦄730.137%
🎄690.13%
😍560.105%
🗿530.1%
🥰160.03%
🤔30.006%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
71
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 48 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @taksebeyarik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈3,140 views788 reactions11 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Скоро конец лета

😢683❤‍🔥6922🕊8🌚6

16 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈5,870 views371 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Стрим: https://www.twitch.tv/taksebeyarik

338❤‍🔥26🎄6🌚1

16 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈6,410 views495 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Кушанья покушаю и буду подрубить, думаю успею к 18:00-18:15 по мск

❤‍🔥39192🕊9🎄2🌚1

16 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈9,330 views2,172 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026

Чё вы там, отдохнули от меня? Думаю сегодня томодочи на часик запустить, надеюсь женюсь на Вите...

1,480🎉652🕊29🌚7🦄4

15 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈9,670 views879 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Такой зачил на два дня, я прям рад, отдохнул и головой и телом, надеюсь получится так в 4ом почаще собираться

745❤‍🔥90🎉37🔥4🦄3

15 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈9,890 views840 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Чё вы там, как молодые?

728🕊53❤‍🔥51😢6🌚2

14 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈12,200 views1,442 reactionsread 17 August 2026

С любимым в двоем телефоном

1,260❤‍🔥121😁54😍4🎄3

14 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈12,400 views1,128 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Никаких фоток не будет, ждите однажды румтур у Эда на канале, а то иж ты хитрые

1,000❤‍🔥84🌚34🔥8🐳2

14 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈12,400 views1,113 reactionsread 17 August 2026

У нас полный зачил, решили ещё 1 денёк отдохнуть у Эда дома, жарим шашлычки, кушаем фруктики, вернусь только завтра 💗

979❤‍🔥88👍33🔥10🕊3

13 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC≈13,800 views1,390 reactions9 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

Это я довольный пляшу

1,180❤‍🔥132😁64🔥8🌚6

13 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈13,400 views1,450 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Чат у меня 2 дня подряд выходные, простите меня грешного, сегодня договорились отдохнуть с Витой, Эдом и Дашей, мы не отмечали др Эда, нашу годовщину, поэтому решили собраться и затусить, буду с братом подушками драться 🤓

1,250❤‍🔥110🌚66🎉22🎄2

12 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈14,700 views1,013 reactions2 Starsread 17 August 2026

Посмотрим во сколько сегодня закончит Эд, если не в 5 утра, то подрублю после него, вечером с Витой договорились посмотреть кино и провести время вместе, так что не теряйте 💗

🔥727234❤‍🔥44🥰5🌚3

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @taksebeyarik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Poll4,390 voters approx.

2 варианта, голосуйте, сегодня за ночь все сделаю

  1. Сервер хардкор, на последней версии, с модом на новые биомы, структуры66%
  2. Сервер ванильный, последняя версия, с модами на новые биомы, структуры53%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 402,997 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТАК СЕБЕ ЯРИК” (@taksebeyarik), 57,019 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taksebeyarik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.